Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

9 Year Old Alleged Overpayment of Housing Benefit


PCoombes100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If anyone could help answer my questions I'd be hugely grateful.

 

In August 2005 I quit work to look after my terminally ill stepfather who passed away in January 2006. At the time I was claiming housing benefit in order to pay my rental costs.

 

In 2007, I started to receive letters from the council saying they had overpaid me housing benefit and wanted me to pay the money back. Despite numerous requests (by me) for information as to why they wanted the money back, I received the same fob off that I owed the money.

 

I then started to receive threatening letters and home visits by council bailiffs (I never let them in or discussed the issue), and asked for written proof of why they were visiting, and was constantly referred back to the council, who, as I mentioned above, constantly ignored my requests for information.

 

Now, 9 years after the alleged overpayment, the council have contacted my employer with an attachment of earnings order and threatened them with a £1000 fine for non-compliance. This month, the council have deducted money from my wages, with no explanation as to why I was (supposedly) overpaid 9 years ago, and have also added nearly £400 (£290 court costs and £100 attachment of earnings order).

 

If someone could advise on where I stand from a legal view as the debt is 9 years old, I have never admitted a liability, and their harassment, it would be hugely appreciated so I can put this matter behind me.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the council will not discuss the matter with you, I'd say contact your MP and ask for help. They should not be collecting repayments from you without explaining how the overpayment has arisen and giving you the chance to appeal the decision.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what they do, suddenly decide you have been overpaid with no explanation at all. I got a new housing benefit award on saturday saying they were taking back £23 a week over payment. No explanation of what the over payment is, how long it goes on for. And nothing in the post today explaining it either.

I think they make it up as they go along, which might be why you have never got any explanation!

I am off there at 2.30 to find out what the heck it's about, as nothing has changed for me!...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

**update**. the council legal department have received my complaint and have asked me to provide proof that I was NOT working 9 years ago and that I should still be entitled to the money I received at the time!! This now means time off work and additional costs to yet and retrieve this information from my bank somehow..... thanks for replies so far, I'll keep you posted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

**update**. the council legal department have received my complaint and have asked me to provide proof that I was NOT working 9 years ago and that I should still be entitled to the money I received at the time!! This now means time off work and additional costs to yet and retrieve this information from my bank somehow..... thanks for replies so far, I'll keep you posted!!

 

How do they suggest you prove you weren't working?

 

Surely you can't prove it, but instead swear (on oath? Declaration subject to penalty??) that you weren't working and THEY would have to prove you were working.

 

However, is there some info missing here?.

When (and what) was their last contact before the AofE?

 

Are they (or the court) claiming any documents were sent that you say you didn't receive?

Did you receive notification of the AofE by post (they must have had the correct address??) or noticed it when your pay packet was short??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
How do they suggest you prove you weren't working?

 

Surely you can't prove it, but instead swear (on oath? Declaration subject to penalty??) that you weren't working and THEY would have to prove you were working.

 

However, is there some info missing here?.

When (and what) was their last contact before the AofE?

 

Are they (or the court) claiming any documents were sent that you say you didn't receive?

Did you receive notification of the AofE by post (they must have had the correct address??) or noticed it when your pay packet was short??

 

Hi

 

They sent letters claiming the overpayment, which I responded asking for explanations on many occasions, however I never received one.

 

Then they sent bailiffs, who I contacted and asked them for information, which they were unable to provide.

 

Then they contacted my employer and threatened them with a £1000 fine if they didn't deduct money!!!

 

My bank have verbally stated they won't go back 9 years+ in statements but the council are demanding written proof of this!!

 

Stuck!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted your MP or local councilor? Because this is getting out of hand. If a debt does indeed exist, someone somewhere must have paperwork to show it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They sent letters claiming the overpayment, which I responded asking for explanations on many occasions, however I never received one.

 

Then they sent bailiffs, who I contacted and asked them for information, which they were unable to provide.

 

Then they contacted my employer and threatened them with a £1000 fine if they didn't deduct money!!!

 

My bank have verbally stated they won't go back 9 years+ in statements but the council are demanding written proof of this!!

 

Stuck!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

A SAR to the bank, it must keep data for 6 years after an account is closed so they may have the statements.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Payroll records are only usually retained for 7 years - not sure if this applies to HMRC or not.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Payroll records are only usually retained for 7 years - not sure if this applies to HMRC or not.

I believe the HMRC must have NI records as these are used in pension calculations.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the HMRC must have NI records as these are used in pension calculations.

 

Ah, yes of course. So if HMRC have no record of NI contributions then that would suggest no employment at that time.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, yes of course. So if HMRC have no record of NI contributions then that would suggest no employment at that time.

If you were unemployed your contribution record would show the NI credits made while on benefits.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...