Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

returning from 8yrs overseas - poss Old CCJ's might give me issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I've been lurking for a while and found loads of useful information about CCJs

but nothing that could answer my particular questions.

 

My situation is that

 

I believe there are several CCJ's issued against me but all must have been more than six years ago

as they do not show up on a search of Trust Online,

so have been removed from the public record (if they exist at all).

 

I left the address where I incurred the debts (several unpaid Credit Cards and a bank overdraft)

eight years ago and actually went abroad, without giving any forwarding addresses to anyone.

 

I have been out of the UK for eight years with no contact whatsoever from any of the companies

or from any court, so I have no idea if these CCJs even exist, but I assume they must, surely.

 

I am aware of the Statue Barred rules and fully understand that any debts

which ARE covered by CCJ will NOT fall under SB.

 

I am just worried that these CCJs could still be enforced in the future

and yet I cannot find any details of them or if they even exist at all.

 

My specific questions are:

 

1) Does anybody have experiences of credit card companies or banks NOT seeking a CCJ for a defaulted debt?

It's worth a shot, I suppose, but highly unlikely.

Maybe as there was no record of me in the UK and thus very little chance of collecting,

they might not even have bothered.

 

2) Is it true that there is no way whatsoever for me to trace these supposed CCJs

without knowing the judgement numbers/dates etc.?

It seems even the courts themselves do not keep a record after six years

and only the original claimant (or the assignee if the debt has been sold) would even know they exist.

 

For obvious reasons I will NOT be contacting the companies concerned.

 

3) What does it take for a 6+ year old CCJ to be "re-activated", if that's the correct term?

 

I have read on here that "unusual" circumstances have to be demonstrated

in another visit to court before a 6 year old CCJ can be actioned.

 

Does this happen often?

Any examples?

Would the fact that I have been totally untraceable in the UK for 8 years

be any sort of mitigation as to why they have not tried to enforce the judgement(s) yet?

 

I think that covers my concerns for now.

 

Let me know if I need to provide any further information and a

 

big THANKS in advance.

Edited by knobbygb
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Knobby and welcome to CAG

 

If the claimant has not " executed the judgment " within 6 years then their judgement becomes statute barred... as the judgment replaced the debt in effect the debt as also become Statute Barred.

 

Section 24 of the Limitations Act 1980....

 

(1) An action shall not be brought upon any judgment after the expiration of six years from the date on which the judgment became enforceable.

 

(2) No arrears of interest in respect of any judgment debt shall be recovered after the expiration of six years from the date on which the interest became due.

 

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the prompt advice Andy.

 

It seems pretty clear cut then,

since it's there in black and white in the Limitations Act.

Yet, despite this, there are many comments on this and other boards

where people claim that judgements have no time limit and can be actioned even after six years

with "a further visit to the court".

Of course, it's difficult to know the accuracy of such claims without details of what this further visit might entail.

 

One of the first things I learned from this site was that what the law says

and what happens in the real world, particularly where county courts are concerned,

can be two very different scenarios,

 

I'd be interested to hear from anybody who actually has concrete experience of actions being attempted under a judgement older than six years.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

even if you had CCJ's there nowt they can do about it

as they were probably issued whilst you can prove you were resident abroad

 

what is your really worry here?

 

if I was abroad and I had CCJ's I wouldn't give a monkies..pers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my worry is that now I am starting again in the UK and once I show up as being here, there will be bailiffs knocking on the door. Personally I am up for the fight, especially after what I have learned here, and I wouldn't care if it just concerned me. But I will be living with my girlfriend and our kids and I don't want to bring down a load of hassle on them and risk their possessions being seized. She is fully aware of the situation and very supportive

but I guess I'm just the kind of person who like to cover all bases and consider everything fully.

 

And, no, I have no way of proving I was ever abroad, or anywhere else for that matter, for the last eight years. I having been living "off-radar" working for cash-in-hand and living with friends and family. There has been absolutely nothing in my name (bank account, rental agreement, vehicle, even a mobile phone) for eight years. In effect I have not existed.

Edited by knobbygb
Link to post
Share on other sites

bailiffs?

 

I very much doubt that.

 

its extremely rare for court baiiffs to go after people with CCJ's

and even rarer for the claimant to get the HCEO's involved as it costs extra

 

and as the CCJ's are prob very old

they'd have to return to court to enforce them. FIRST.

 

have you actually done a trustonline search at your old address to check if any CCJ are there?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri I see you have checked

 

pers I think you are worrying about nothing.

 

and again , bailiffs cannot take anything else bar YOUr belongings

 

but anyway

 

that's an extremely rare. and after 6yrs.

 

forget about them

 

go get on with your new life.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I've done a Trust search and there are no CCJ's listed but, as I say, all my defaults were around eight years ago so the judgements would almost certainly have been removed by now anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I'm not really THAT worried but, as I said, just very thorough. The whole subject is fascinating and this site and its contributors have made me feel much better already.

 

Bailiffs cannot take anything else bar YOUR belongings

 

Well, yes.... but the onus is on YOU to prove that they belong to someone else, NOT on the bailiff to prove they belong to you. Bailiffs would be a stress, but there is no way I would let them in under any circumstances so it is almost a moot argument anyway. Always assuming THEY conform to the rules and guidelines of course.... and I REALLY WOULD trust them to do that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget about them

 

go get on with your life

 

prob been sold on years and years ago

 

there are no examples that I have seen of anyone actually having any issues when returning after 8yrs.

 

IMHO you are worrying about 'nothing'.

 

which even if 'nothing' does turn up

 

its easily dealt with.

you certainly will not and cannot

have hoards of bailiffs breaking your door down as soon as you register on voters.

 

old wives tales.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I'm not really THAT worried but, as I said, just very thorough. The whole subject is fascinating and this site and its contributors have made me feel much better already.

 

 

 

Well, yes.... but the onus is on YOU to prove that they belong to someone else, NOT on the bailiff to prove they belong to you. Bailiffs would be a stress, but there is no way I would let them in under any circumstances so it is almost a moot argument anyway. Always assuming THEY conform to the rules and guidelines of course.... and I REALLY WOULD trust them to do that!

 

no you go do a statutory declaration to the fact

 

anyway this thread is getting WAY too paranoid now.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically the Claimant can apply to court for permission to enforce the judgment and it would be for the court to decide.

 

After so long abroad it's unlikely anything will happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And technically I have yet to see either one claimant try to apply for permission or one ever being allowed:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And technically I have yet to see either one claimant try to apply for permission or one ever being allowed:wink:

 

I personally have done a couple of applications and been successful, the oldest CCJ being 14 years old.

 

The Defendant has been abroad and the Claimant couldn't reasonably have enforced without having to incur huge costs. Some Judges would think it reasonable to wait until the Defendant returns but it really is a lottery.

 

Maybe I just got lucky! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of debt were they in regard to Gany?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...