Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Shoesmiths Claimform - old catalogue 'debt'


mitsy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've just received a county court claim form from Shoosmiths LLP claiming on behalf of Cabot Financial for an old Premier Man account from the 17/12/2008 for the sum off £406. I don't have any paper work from the account and got into financial difficulty around that time.

 

Can anyone please shed some light on what is the next step, should I ask for a copy of the agreement etc. It says I have 14 days to reply so any help would be much appreciated.

 

I have made no payments since 2008.

 

Regards Mitsy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have received a claim form. Yes

 

In order for us to help you we require the following information:-

 

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 19th June

 

Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

 

The claimant claims the sum of £321.56 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and Premier man. And assigned to the claimant on 13/01/2012, notice of which has been provided to the defendant.

The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served persuant to the consumer credit act 1974.

The claimant claims the sum of £321.56 and costs.

The claimant has complied, as far as is in the pre-action conduct practise direction.

 

What is the value of the claim? £321.56 court fee £35 solicitors fees £50 totall amount £406.56

 

Has the claimant included section 69 interest (8%)within the total claim or is it shown separate within the Particulars but not added to the debt? No

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? No

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Cabot financial.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Can't remember

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Can't remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments:- financial difficulty.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

What you need to do now. How I proceed, and what forms do I need to send, can I ask for a copy of the agreement.

 

Answer the questions above

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA1974 request to the claimant

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts

 

Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards

 

Request 2 - Current accounts

 

You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself.

Please not that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.

 

If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.

 

If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form

 

If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court.

Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.

Edited by Andyorch
Hi light on PoC
Link to post
Share on other sites

So you need to acknowledge the claim first Misty as above add 19 days to the date on the claim...that is your acknowledgement date but you can do it anytime now once you have registered to use the MCOL service.

 

Then you need to decide if your intended action ...do you wish to defend? If so you need to request the information as outlined above ..CPR 31.14 and CCA (credit consumer agreement) request.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, CPR 31.14 and CCA have been sent off, and I have acknowledged it through MCOL.

What would be the next step, if they ignore the request, can I ask the court to set it aside due to non compliance.

 

I also don't think what they say I owe is incorrect, if I remember correctly, I think the credit limit was for a £100 but don't have anything to back this up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, CPR 31.14 and CCA have been sent off, and I have acknowledged it through MCOL.

What would be the next step, if they ignore the request, can I ask the court to set it aside due to non compliance.No they are not compelled to disclose pre defence...disclosure follows the defence

 

I also don't think what they say I owe is incorrect, if I remember correctly, I think the credit limit was for a £100 but don't have anything to back this up.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if they ignore the CCA and CPR 31.14, and I put in my defence that they have not produced the credit agreement, and they come back and say they cannot provide one, would this be sufficient enough to have it thrown out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant ignore the CCA they can decline the CPR...they will have to disclose irrespective at the relative stage when the court directs...if they fail the court will strike it out.

 

If they cant respond to the CCA then there is little point proceeding...but the court again will deal with that as above at the necessary stage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delaying tactics..there is no legal requirement for a signature.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received this back from the solicitors after I signed and returned my requests.

 

"We acknowledge receipt of your recent letters.

 

As you should be aware S78(1) CCA 1974 states that "the creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debter a copy of the executed agreement..

 

Your request is returned to you because we are not the creditor- we are a firm of Solicitors.

 

In any event, it may be useful to explain that the Credit Agreement was terminated when you failed to comply with the terms of the Default Notice issued. We refer you to the judgment of His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC in the Rankine V American Express Service Europe Limited.

 

In response to your request made pursuant to CPR 31.14 we respectfully point out that the proceedings in this instance were issued via the County Court Bulk Centre, which is a procedure specifically provided for in the CPR. PD 7(1.4)(3A) States that "the requirements in the paragraph 7.3 of the practice direction 16 (statements of case) for documents to be attached to the particulars of contract claims does not apply to claims to be issued by the Centre..."

 

Furthermore, as you should be aware, CPR 31.14(1) States:-

 

"a party may inspect a document mentioned in -

 

(a) a statement of case,

(b) a witness statement,

© a witness summary, or

(d) an affidavit"

 

The documents you requested are not "mentioned" in our particulars of the Claim and therefore CPR 31.14(1) does not apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received this back from the solicitors after I signed and returned my requests.

 

"We acknowledge receipt of your recent letters.

 

As you should be aware S78(1) CCA 1974 states that "the creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debter a copy of the executed agreement..

 

Your request is returned to you because we are not the creditor- we are a firm of Solicitors.Who are acting for the claimant in litigation of this agreement

 

In any event, it may be useful to explain that the Credit Agreement was terminated when you failed to comply with the terms of the Default Notice issued. We refer you to the judgment of His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC in the Rankine V American Express Service Europe Limited.

 

Nonsense and laughable from a supposedly firm of solicitors...the fact its terminated has no effect on a section 77/78/79 request and is applicable until replaced by a judgment (CCJ)

In response to your request made pursuant to CPR 31.14 we respectfully point out that the proceedings in this instance were issued via the County Court Bulk Centre, which is a procedure specifically provided for in the CPR. PD 7(1.4)(3A) States that "the requirements in the paragraph 7.3 of the practice direction 16 (statements of case) for documents to be attached to the particulars of contract claims does not apply to claims to be issued by the Centre..."

 

You never stated that ....you requested disclosure of the documents referred to in their particulars vis a CPR 31.14 not that they were not attached

 

Furthermore, as you should be aware, CPR 31.14(1) States:-

 

"a party may inspect a document mentioned in -

 

(a) a statement of case,

(b) a witness statement,

© a witness summary, or

(d) an affidavit"

 

The documents you requested are not "mentioned" in our particulars of the Claim and therefore CPR 31.14(1) does not apply.

 

What did you request ? Were they referred to in their particulars?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean the CCA and CPR i requested Andy? Think I only have a few more days to state my defence, any idea what I should put in it, template letter etc. I'm a bit clueless when it comes to things like this, with the last dabble with legal letters etc being when everyone was claiming bank chargers back. And I missed the deadline by one day.

 

Thanks for the help Andy much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you request in your CPR 31.14 and what did they refer to in the particulars?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked for the.

 

2: the assignment*

 

3: the default notice*

 

4: the termination notice*

 

5: statement of account*

 

Don't think they referred to anything Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant claims the sum of £321.56 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and Premier man. And assigned to the claimant on 13/01/2012, notice of which has been provided to the defendant.

 

The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974.

 

The claimant claims the sum of £321.56 and costs.

The claimant has complied, as far as is in the pre-action conduct practice direction.

 

Credit agreement

Notice of Assignment

Default Notice

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes....have they returned your CCA fee or kept it?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay send just the CCA request to Cabot ....attach a covering letter stating that you have previously requested this information from Shoos who are representing you Cabot as Claimant in litigation with regards to an ongoing claim number xxxxxxxx and that they are deliberately denying you from seeking this legal request in support of your defence and quoting and relying on Rankine V American Express Service Europe Limited.

 

You must empathise that should this request not be complied with you will bring it to the courts attention at the appropriate point of proceedings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy to try and put things a bit more in to perspective, i have 2 claims against me at roughly the same time. i didn't want to start a new thread so based the 2 claims of this one.

 

Shoesmiths have actually not Acknowledged the CCA or the CPR 31.14. it was the other solicitors Restons who have replied, but i'm just trying to keep things simple.

i have had no response from shoesmiths. MCOL Acknowledged my service on the 30/06/20114. so its now been 15 days since i entered into MCOL, and the CCA and CPR were posted first class recorded on the 02/072014.

 

Should i now enter a defence of non compliance? Im dealing with the other case as you instructed.

 

Do the think it's worthwhile sending this to Restons.

 

Section 77/78 Request

As prescribed under section 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

To **** **** **** ****

 

I write to instruct you Restons Solicitors Who are acting for the claimant in litigation of this agreement to supply me with a copy of the above Regulated Credit Agreement, including any document referred to therein and statement of account under the legislation contained within Section 77 and 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I enclose the statutory fee of £1:00 as required per this request. Failure to comply with this request is a criminal offence under the Consumer Credit Act of 1974. Under 189 of the Consumer Credit Act of 1974 you are obliged to provide these documents whether you are the original creditor or not.

 

If you the Solicitor acting on behalf of the claimant under an agreement fail to comply with this request within 12 days you will be in default and as a consequence not entitled to enforce the agreement and where the default continues for one month you the creditor/Solicitor will commit an offence.

 

Yours faithfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is this thread Shoes or Restons?

 

Dont send the above to whoever...its no longer a criminal offence

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It started out as shoes but a few days later I got one from restons basically for a cat debt both Cabot so just kept it as it is. Shoes have ignored me and it's Restons who declined the CPR and CCA.

 

I already posted the above 77/78 request :(

 

All the dates on this thread are regarding to shoes, I only added the restons bit as they are the ones that actually replied.

 

Is there a templet letter I could add to MCOL regarding the shoes, the court letter was dated the 19th June and I acknowledged it through MCOL on the 30th June, so I think the 33 days are nearly up, and it has now been 14 days since I sent the CCA AND CPR to shoes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is the shoesmith claim then I would advise a new thread for Restons and a time line of what you have done so far together with any responses/court documents etc.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...