Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Experian passed on my details as someone else


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Recently I had a letter from a DCA asking me if I was a person of my name who lived at an address in Rhyl.

 

Apart from the fact I've never been near Rhyl

 

I was concerned that my information as provided by Experian was now linked with this person who shared my name.

 

So I contacted the DCA who assured me that the information was not linked.

 

Which now leads me to the Data Protection Act

where a company is not allowed to pass on an individuals information

unless they are sure that it is that person.

 

I have checked my Experian Equifax & noddle accounts and Rhyll does not shown in any of them,

so how could Experian be sure that the person was me

and be confident about sending a DCA to hassle me about somebody elses debt.

 

I am REALLY unhappy about this,

 

I had to about 5 years ago make myself insolvent because I lost my job,

but have worked my way back and now have a reasonable credit rating

and now have credit cards back again and am managing them perfectly.

 

So to have this random DCA has really had me rattled.

 

What can I do about this, the ICO web site is not really helpful when it comes to complaints.

 

Thanks for reading

 

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

my guess is that the DCA has done a search on your name and has posted a speculative letter to each match .

 

Hi

I have to agree. DCAs have a contract with the CRAs which allow them to search the register.

 

I do believe that DCAs now have the responsibility to ensure that the person they are chasing is the correct person.

 

A long very dry read is here

 

http://fshandbook.info/FS/html/handbook/CONC

 

CONC 7.5 spells it out quite clearly.

 

http://fshandbook.info/FS/html/handbook/CONC/7/5

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox,

 

I am concerned that my details have been used in relation to whatever debt this person has,

the DCA should not be sending letters out to everyone on file that shares my name as clearly shown below.

 

A firm must not pursue an individual whom the firm knows or believes might not be the borrower or hirer under a credit agreement or a consumer hire agreement.

[Note: paragraph 3.5f of DCG].

 

I've just complained to the Financial Ombudsman and also am looking into the Data Protection Commission , my information should NOT be used this way, that is the whole point of the Data Protection Act surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if I've lost the plot

 

but Experian don't send DCA's

and if the address is not showing on any CRA file

 

this has nothing to do with Experian at all?

 

just a std DCA phishing letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could we see the letter please.

There are new CONC rules about this now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, I will scan and post it up later, have to go to work now.

 

dx100uk My wording was probably misleading, I know Experian don't send DCA's but unless they where sure that I was the person in question they should not have handed out my address and the DCA should not have used it without being sure it was me.. Simple date of birth or looking to see if the address is linked to my address list.

 

There is something wrong with how Experian and the DCA have treated this and I don't see why I have to be at the receiving end, they should NOT have contacted me for ANY reason because I am not the person they are looking for

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its called a phishing letter. They se d out a mass mail and hope to get a bite.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its called a phishing letter. They se d out a mass mail and hope to get a bite.

 

Except they are now not allowed to. They have to be sure that the person they are after is correct.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You need to convert your upload to a pdf file Hentooth to enable posters to view it.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys,

 

The letter is a phishing one, I have been trying to take Lowell to task over this,

I complained about their illegal use of my personal information in June and they are "investigating",

but so far even though I have prodded them a few times, I have heard nothing.

 

I contacted the Financial Ombudsman but they can't help because I am not a customer of Lowell so they can't get involved.

 

 

I thought as it's my personal information can the information commissioner help.

.. No it's not a bit of legislation they Police (odd I thought they are there to do just that).

 

 

I tried the FCA whose website the document is on, and they can't help, if fact told me to go to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Can anyone steer me in the right direction please?

 

Incidentally and on the side

 

 

I have 2 DCA's chasing my wife but have got them tied in so many knots,

the absolute panic in the last letter I got from one of them made me laugh out loud.

 

 

I'll post it all in a separate thread when I've done turning the thumbscrews..

 

 

. I may well be able to get a DCA set on them and have a go at a CCJ, then send the Bailiffs.

. I'll give you all a laugh about that later, you'll love it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Illegal use of your info?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

By contacting me without being sure that I AM the person they are after, as per Conc, see above..

 

"A firm must not pursue an individual whom the firm knows

or believes might not be the borrower or hirer under a credit agreement or a consumer hire agreement.

[Note: paragraph 3.5f of DCG]."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...