Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Funding concerns are expected to see Saudi Arabia reduce its giant building schemes.View the full article
    • Why the former Fujitsu engineer is such a key figure in the Post Office scandal.View the full article
    • next time dont panic and wet yourself and offer payment !! Date of issue – 14 june 2024 date for aos - 2nd july  date to file defence - 16th july      other than the CCA/CRP and if it ever gets that far..a witness statement, you send them NOTHING and dont ever instigate comms with them. esp by email.. i would be sending one final email in reply to theirs above. PLEASE NOTE: email is NOT to be used for any comms with regard to our mutual court claim. else they'll be sending a whole forest of faked agreements/documents to you one minute before a court deadline removing your shace to object/pull them apart as unenforceable etc. dx        
    • The EU and China still disagree about the import taxes, but have agreed to discuss them further.View the full article
    • Unbelievably I can't find it, I will have a really good look for it when I have a bit more time on my day off this week. AS a side note, I emailed them offering a token payment to settle the account and avoid court action, which unsurprisingly they have declined. However their reply states:  A Claim was accepted on 19 June 2024 which means we cannot set up a payment plan just yet. You should have received a claims pack from the Court. We would ask for this to be completed with your offer of repayment and returned to either ourselves or the Court.  You have 21 days for this to be completed and returned in order to avoid a Judgment by Default. This means we would need to receive this by 10 July 2024. I was under the impression it was 19 days from date on the claim form. which was the 14th, which would be 3rd July. Could I use this against them as it seems like they are giving me false information in the hope of getting a judgement by default?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

going Bankrupt - advised to pay-off sygma CCj/charging order


john
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3655 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a credit card from sygma on which I owe £2335.

 

they obtained a ccj on 1 April and interim charging order on 17th May.

 

I am in the process of declaring bankruptcy and have now received a notice of a full charging application to be heard in court on 14th July.

 

I have been receiving financial advice re: bankruptcy, and have been advised to pay this before the bankruptcy.

 

I have the £700 for the bankruptcy.

 

Should I write now and offer £700 and the rest instalments?

 

Also should I ask them to accept my offer in writing and put that when it is paid they will fully remove the charge from the land registry

and clear the debt from my file?

 

Is there anything else I should specify?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you not defend the case?

 

was this sigma or a DCA that got the CCJ/CO?

 

tell us more

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not defend because I had my head in the sand re: mydebts as I did not have any money as I haven't worked for a year. I hadn't evenbeen opening my post, just throwing it into a pile. The property in questionbelongs to my daughter and I was supposed to be guarantor for the mortgage butat the last minute the building society said I would have to go on as a jointmortgagee, and the solicitor would document that I only owned 1% of theequity. When I realised that I needed togo bankrupt my daughter contacted the solicitor, who said they had no record ofthis as they have lost the documents. During this process we both received aletter from the land reg. saying ascent had a charging order and we could agreeor defend it by June 20th. We both wrote to object due to a) my daughter notbeing liable, and b) my bankruptcy which was due to be declared on Monday. Obviously the charging order is my firstworry as it is my daughters property, the debt is very small really.

They (Ascent)obtained a CCJ on 1st April and an Interim Charging Order in the County Courton 17th May.

Land Registry willbe registering this interim order against the property.

The Full Chargingapplication is being heard in the County Court on 14th July.

My advice from accountant was to pay all money saved forbankruptcy to settling the charge, but he has today alerted me to thisarticle:-

http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/charging-orders-and-their-impact-on-creditors-and-debtors/53640.article

which refers to several cases whereby the Full ChargingOrder petition has been DECELINED by the Court because the creditor hasobtained a Bankruptcy Order between the Interim Charging Order and the FullCharging Order Court application. (i.e. if I were to get a Bankruptcy Order BEFORE 14th July then there could bea good chance that the Charging Order will be thrown out by the Court)

I am even more confused than ever, now, as the accountanthas quite rightly stated that he is not a solicitor and it is just advice. My bankruptcy appointment is at 10am mondayand I have only got the fee to my name. So do I pay bankruptcy fee or debtcollector?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was asent legals client the claimant

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok the w/end can be quiet with those that can help

 

I've moved you to the legal forum

 

you should get help here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you go bankrupt, do you want to stay in your home by buying the beneficial interest from the official receiver (OR)? Is that why you have been advised to pay Sigma before bankruptcy.

 

I hope you are aware that preferential treatment of creditors could get you in to trouble with the OR.

 

I think that there may be weighty consequences at stake here. If you haven't already, I would post up on the MSE Bankruptcy And Living With It forum for additional advice. I am not knocking the experts here on CAG, but in this case I would be casting my net as wide as possible. If you do go bankrupt it will be a good forum for general advice and support as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The property is in negative equity so there is no financial benefit from selling it but my daughter would potentially purchase my share. This debt is included with the bankruptcy but I thought the potential charging order would take precedence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are a joint owner on the deeds, therefore only a restriction on the deeds, read up about restriction and charging orders, you may be panicking for nothing? the restriction would be on the deeds until one day property sold then if a decent solicitor knew the rule they would notify the O.C. after payments have been given out ! I am sure others will advise soonest, see what they state???

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...