Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What would you consider 'reasonable'


flooz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm just about to write a letter concerning a bed, but before I do, I am wondering about the 'reasonable' part of the SOGA. As it's down to opinion of what is reasonable, and I may be being unreasonable.

 

So, if you bought an 'expensive' bed, and I mean £1,200, how long would you expect it to last?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Whats the problem with it, is it the mattress your not happy with ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

It probably depends what was being done on it and by how many people and how often and over what period of time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, I would think that too.

 

In fact, my previous bed, which was slightly less in £'s, but taking into consideration time value of money, etc.

probably equates to a similar price, is now 15 years old, and still doesn't have any 'sagging' problems which the 'new' one has.

 

It has been inspected by the company, who have confirmed that the sagging is 'excessive' (after 5 years),

 

and they are offering to replace it, with my covering 5/6th of the original cost, which is 1/6th of the cost for each year of use.

 

While I can half understand what they are saying, personally, I think for a bed of this price/quality, it should last considerably longer than 6 years,

 

AND I would imagine, even with a 1/6th discount, they will still make a profit, for the second time.

 

I would imagine, I could negotiate a discount close to that level with any supplier, not one that has supplied what I consider one of inferior quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps, neither myself or my OH are overweight, and the bed has only had 'normal' use.

 

I think that we are all very relieved to hear it.

 

Your analysis seems very well structured. I suppose that it depends on expert appraisal. The offer of 1/6 is probably based upon their view of the contractual limitation period and I don't think that this is a relevant measure. There might be many items which would be expected to last a great deal less than 6 years.

Have you got their assessment in writing? At least if they agree that there is a problem, that means that you won't have to look for independent evidence. Also as they are prepared to put their hands up to a problem, it suggests that they are a reasonable company and which is concerned about the quality of their product. Kudos to them.

 

I think that the question for you is - what do you want out of it and what are you prepared to do to get it.

What is your formula for a solution and have you put it to them.

 

One thing you could put to them is - if they advertised a bed of this quality and of this price, and claimed for it - This bed will only cost you 1 5/6 of its price every 12 years, would they sell any?

 

If they think that they still would, then they may feel that you have had value for money. If not, then clearly they need to revisit the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder. Apologies, but I'm not with you on this bit.

One thing you could put to them is - if they advertised a bed of this quality and of this price, and claimed for it - This bed will only cost you 1 5/6 of its price every 12 years, would they sell any?

 

If they think that they still would, then they may feel that you have had value for money. If not, then clearly they need to revisit the problem.

 

I accept that I have had 5 years of use of the bed, and as such fully expected to make a contribution to a replacement (although I'm not sure of the SOGA allows for depreciation), but 5/6th indicates they only expect the bed to last 6 years, AND the original price wasn't just for the mattress it was for the whole divan and drawers! A 1/6th discount (approximately 16.6%) could probably be negotiated with any retailer, and still allow them to make a profit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder. Apologies, but I'm not with you on this bit.

 

 

I accept that I have had 5 years of use of the bed, and as such fully expected to make a contribution to a replacement (although I'm not sure of the SOGA allows for depreciation), but 5/6th indicates they only expect the bed to last 6 years, AND the original price wasn't just for the mattress it was for the whole divan and drawers! A 1/6th discount (approximately 16.6%) could probably be negotiated with any retailer, and still allow them to make a profit.

 

Well, you have to look at their offer and calculate the full price of a bed for 10 years. The price you paid plus the price you will have to pay for continuing to have a bed for the next 4 years - which you say is the reasonable expected life of the bed.

Could they sell a bed at that price.

 

Just a quick thought too: I'm having to deal with the manufacturer, as the retailer went out of business. Does this affect any rights under SOGA?

 

Yes, this makes all the difference. The manufacturer owes you no contractual duties. They are a stranger to the contract and I don't even think that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 applies.

If they have offered 1/6 then take it. It is the best you will do unless you can get a better deal from a retailer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I with you now. I think that is a good point, and I shall certainly put something along those lines in my letter.

 

With regards to the SOGA, thank you for clarifying that, I really wasn't sure. So, if a retailer goes out of business, do consumer rights disappear with that?

 

I need to know all the relevant facts and opinions, as that will dictate the 'tone' of my letter back to them. I'm currently taking the 'disappointed' tone, so I shall see if that gets me anywhere. I've had a little mooch round the internet, and reading of various websites that relate to the industry, the general consensus is that a good mattress should last 8-10 years, or more. So given my initial outlay, I don't think I'm being unreasonable in my disappointment. One thing for sure, if I do have to buy a full priced replacement, I shall be getting it from a different manufacturer. :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if the manufacturer is good enough to take an interest this far along and to try and offer a discount, then it shouldn't be overlooked. It isn't worth overlooking the quality of the bed only because you think that the manufacturer should make a better offer.

Other manufacturers would probably offer you nothing at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the quality that I'm disappointed with. When I chose this bed, it was on the basis of it being of very good quality, which I fully expected to pay extra for. The reality is, it hasn't lasted anywhere near as long as other (cheaper) beds I have had in my years. If I had known that it would only last 5 years, I would never have bought it. Their representative has confirmed that it should not be sagging after only 5 years, going into detail of the quality of the individual pocketed springs etc. even saying that they would probably cut it in half once returned to find out what the problem is, so they can ensure it doesn't happen in future products.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...