Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pharmaceutical companies


moll 61
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have the exteme misfortune to suffer from Cluster Headaches,

 

part of my treatment for this is Sumatriptan injections, these come in 6mg auto inject pens.

 

I am only allowed to use 2 in any 24 hour period.

 

some days I have to ride out 2-3 other headaches at 45 mins each.

 

Having joined support forums etc I have noted that most sufferers split their needles (physically dismantle the auto inject pens)

and manually inject 3 mg as this will abort an attack and will give them 4 injections a day if necassary.

 

I have asked my GP if they come in smaller doses and he states no.

 

In the states, they get vials of Sumatriptan and needles to draw up their own dose.

 

I have emailed the pharmaceutical co that produces the pens and asked why they do not do smaller doses

and the reply was a short one line " we only do the 6mg" no reason as to why etc.

 

surely this must be costing the NHS if I am using twice as much as I need to,

 

and I am suffering twice as much some days as I need to.

(if you are not familiar with CH google most excruciating pain known to science).

 

Should I press this with my MP?

 

or what action could be suggested?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I wrote to the NHS who redirected me to NICE who inturn directed me to MHRA, they have responded and will get back to me within 18 days. I mentioned this to my Doctor and was met with a blank expression, I felt as if I was interfering? I am due to see my Neurologist next month and hope to have some information with me to see if us sufferers can obtain what we need and probably save the NHS a fortune in the process

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to the NHS who redirected me to NICE who inturn directed me to MHRA, they have responded and will get back to me within 18 days. I mentioned this to my Doctor and was met with a blank expression, I felt as if I was interfering? I am due to see my Neurologist next month and hope to have some information with me to see if us sufferers can obtain what we need and probably save the NHS a fortune in the process

 

Would it help if you can "back up" the anecdotal use of lower doses by dismantling kits with some of the clinical research behind this practice (noting that GSK even supplied 3mg kits during their study in Japan).

 

2 links to such (there may be more studies too.....)

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16109122/

 

http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/files2/21105.pdf

 

Sadly, though : it may not save the NHS money.

Just because it has half the dose doesn't mean half the cost as the drug may not be the main expense.

In fact, if it is only produced in small amounts, the lower dose kit might be more expensive!.

However, if you can take 4 doses (treating 4 attacks) instead of 2 doses (treating 2) : it may be a better option for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...