Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have you received a letter or card asking you to make contact - or that there is a parcel for you?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2790 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have you received any kind of communication asking you to make contact because there is a parcel for you - or for some other unexplained matter?

 

We would like to know about it.

 

Such contacts are illegal under the FCA conc regs - specifically - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?426126-CONC-7.9-Contact-with-customers

 

Here is an example of card left by APS. It breaches FCA regulations in a number of ways.

 

We would be very interested to see other examples of this kind of contact.

Please post up your letters, cards or other examples in this thread

 

Please note that we are talking about debt collection messages here. Not viruses or spam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Morning BF. As you’ll know from another thread, there is some HFO history related to this type of collection tactic.

 

Initially, around 2006, they issued fake delivery cards from an HFO-associated company called First Direct Logistics – see here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?53765-Capquest-First-Direct-Logistics-Concilian-Group/page2

 

The OP has confused the source of the cards, as it’s not Capquest but HFO. A quick Google will find many similar threads.

 

HFO got caught out on this but they didn’t give up. They launched another outfit called Siverpoint – see this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?278901-Silverpoint-delivery-service-card-in-your-door-HFO-Services

 

Naturally, we pretty soon caught them out and encouraged victims to go to the OFT with a complaint.

 

Some of this predates the CPUTR legislation, and the FCA regs, but it shows that it pays to be vigilant – HFO are currently appealing the OFT’s decision to revoke their licences, and evidence of this kind of behaviour played a significant part in the OFT’s decision.

 

Although these cases are historical, they explain clearly the background and why such tactics are unfair, and why such instances MUST be reported to the FCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really... This APS issue still kicking? I noticed it on another thread that I had commented on... I agree that its not right...

I have a question though, what if you were to refuse delivery of such a package if they turned up ^__^

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now there is a direct right of action under the CONC rules.

If you receive misleading or non-specific communications from companies which are trying to trick you into making contact, they are committing a breach of the FCA conc regs.

 

For example, IND use APS and you have seen their card.

IND claim on their website - http://www.ind.co.uk/ that part of their values is

 

 

Fairness

 

IND is a fair and responsible debt collector

providing absolute clarity to individual debtors

at each stage of its debt collection process.

 

 

 

It's strange because from what I have been reading, this doesn't seem to be quite correct.

 

They also claim to satisfy

all regulatory standards.

 

 

 

Surely, the use of this form of contact by IND's agent APS breaches these regulatory standards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that we should do whatever we can now to highlight companies which use misleading tactics and which breach the FCA regulations.

 

It should be entirely possible to bring a small claim against any company which does so, for a modest amount - say, £50 in order to obtain a judgment which can then be passed to the FCA as the basis of a complaint.

 

This would be much more effective than reporting it to the FCA or to CAB for some quiet soft-touch word-in-your-ear regulation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why. It works for me and I can see that many other people have visited it

Link to post
Share on other sites

The printed x's in the option boxes is a dead give away, is the courier really carrying around a printer with him.

  • Haha 1

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The printed x's in the option boxes is a dead give away, is the courier really carrying around a printer with him.

 

What a brilliant point. I hadn't clocked that one at all.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The printed x's in the option boxes is a dead give away, is the courier really carrying around a printer with him.

 

They'll probably claim that they carry copies of all possible pre-printed variations!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would need six sets of cards. I don't think that anyone would believe it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would need six sets of cards. I don't think that anyone would believe it.

 

No, they would need eight:

 

No one was at home/letter

No one was at home/letter/signature required

No one was at home/parcel

No one was at home/parcel/signature required

No access to building/letter

No access to building/letter/signature required

No access to building/parcel

No access to building/parcel/signature required

 

I'll get me coat....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - I get the point but as far as I can see, on the number of tickbox combinations, there are 6 combinations. I think that the bottom three are simple alternatives -

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they would need eight:

 

No one was at home/letter

No one was at home/letter/signature required

No one was at home/parcel

No one was at home/parcel/signature required

No access to building/letter

No access to building/letter/signature required

No access to building/parcel

No access to building/parcel/signature required

 

I'll get me coat....

 

One less than that, unless it was an oversized letter that didn't require a signature that wouldn't fit through the letter box when no-one was at home ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like there are lies, damned lies - and APS calling cards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yesterday I received a letter with a card in it. It read

This is only for carefully selected individuals...

 

 

web site is personal-invitation it is a co dot uk

 

 

Please visit as soon as you can

You must not miss this opportunity

It went straight in the bin, but I fished it out in case this is of interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, the site would not let me put the web address as on the card, so I spelt it out.

Also I don't know why it put the chain and underlined interest. It looks like a link, but was not something I intended

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that it came form a debt collector?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult to tell. I normally bin anything anonymous.

It's only the fact that the CAG email came out today asking about it and that it was still relatively accessible.

No way am I going to go to the site to check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really... This APS issue still kicking? I noticed it on another thread that I had commented on... I agree that its not right...

I have a question though, what if you were to refuse delivery of such a package if they turned up ^__^

 

 

i think the clue is that the postman brings it posted as a letter. not a guy in a van

:???: what me. never heard of you never had a debt with you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any kind of communication asking you to make contact because there is a parcel for you - or for some other unexplained matter?

 

We would like to know about it.

 

Such contacts are illegal under the FCA conc regs - specifically - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?426126-CONC-7.9-Contact-with-customers

 

Here is an example of card left by APS. It breaches FCA regulations in a number of ways.

attachment.php?attachmentid=51517&d=1402468536

[ATTACH=CONFIG]51517[/ATTACH]

 

We would be very interested to see other examples of this kind of contact.

Please post up your letters, cards or other examples in this thread

 

 

Who's to say it was a spam email or debt collection letter i received?

You ask for copies of requests of parcel collections you receive - I dont know if its debt collection or spam email!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This happened to me recently at work. I owed some money on an old Capital One account and it had been moved to debt company called Frederick LTD. They some how got my work telephone - I work as a civil servant and I am not allowed personal calls at work as I work in a customer focused area - they left a message for me stating that a 'parcel was waiting to picked up - from Fed X ' when i contacted them it was an obvious [problem] and it was the debt company. I have also received a letter / card at the home the same day when I returned later that day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...