Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sickness pay removed while off work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'd be grateful for a little advice on the problem I've had at work recently.

 

I injured my wrist in a football match in March, but carried on working for six weeks until the injury got worse and I eventually had to go to a doctor. I was signed off completely for two weeks and given a wrist splint to wear. A few days later I was due to appear in a Cup final for my football team, so I asked the doctor and he said I would be ok to play as long as I wore the splint.

 

My employer has a policy of four weeks full pay when signed off by a doctor - at the employers discretion. I was told by HR I would receive full pay while I was off. I was signed off on the Friday, and played football on the Monday (about 20 mins as a substitute).

 

The following Thursday I received a letter, along with photos from my facebook page and a match report, stating that I would not be paid sick pay as my actions were deemed 'irresponsible and likely to impinge on my return to work'. The letter said they would only pay SSP or suggested I could get my doctor to change the note to light duties and return on full pay performing light duties.

 

I wanted to take the two weeks off as the repetitive nature of my work in a warehouse would cause problems to my wrist, but as they refused sick pay, and I can't afford to live on SSP, I suggested a compromise that I take the two weeks as holiday before returning on light duties, to which they agreed.

 

In the first two days that I was signed off, my manager had viewed my linkedin profile, and I had messages from two friends at work to say they had overheard him discussing my personal circumstances with other members of staff both in the warehouse and office. He had obviously also printed photos from my facebook page and the match report which were posted to me.

 

During the two weeks I was off I saw a consultant at hospital and was diagnosed with a problem with my tendons and am awaiting an MRI scan to assess whether I will need surgery.

 

On my return to work I handed in a sick note from the hospital which put me on light duties for six weeks while we wait for the scan appointment. I have been asked to undertake telephonist duties in the office. The same day my manager viewed my linkedin profile again. (I work as a freelance writer in my spare time, so I assume he was trying to find something incriminating against me). I have been typing one-handed as I can't use my left hand.

 

Neither my manager nor the director who signed off the letter have spoken to me since I returned (four weeks ago), and last week I decided to hand in my notice, as I feel that it will be very difficult to return to work in the warehouse.

 

I don't really know where I stand here. I can understand the company's issue with me playing football, but I did explain in an email exchange that I took my doctors advice, so I don't think my actions were irresponsible.

 

A friend who is in HR (different company) said she thought they should have called me in for a meeting to discuss or held an investigation to establish the facts, rather than just sending me a letter removing my sickness benefit.

 

Just to put this in perspective - a colleague broke his wrist last year and was given a full month's sick pay. He plays lead guitar in a band and freely admitted to 'drinking his way through the pain' to perform at gigs while on sick pay. Our manager also happens to be his brother-in-law and band manager!

 

So I feel it is a little hypocritical to get hung up on me playing 20 minutes of football, although I would accept two wrongs don't make a right.

 

Sorry to ramble on so much, but any thoughts would be appreciated, thanks in advance...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've resigned - I'm not entirely sure what advice you are looking for, as that will bring the matter to an end?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, should have said. I wondered if there is a case for constructive dismissal? My friend is saying that they should have followed the correct HR procedures of holding a meeting etc. I didn't really want to resign, as I may be unable to work for some time after an operation, but the atmosphere at work is hard to deal with. Also the digging by my manager on social media as well as discussing me with other general members of staff feels a little off? Maybe he's done nothing wrong though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You needed to follow your company's grievence procedure. You also need 2 years continueous service to bring a constructive dismissal claim.

 

Sadly this looks like it could of been resolved via the grievance procedure so the tribunal would not look favorably on your case. By failing to follow the procedures the tribunal can cut any award by up to 50% anyway

 

You *might* be able to lodge a comprehensive grievance now and say you felt bullied into resigning but now wish to withdraw your resignation. You would need to get written statements from those who overheard the manager talking about your circumstances publicly. If proven this would be a breach of "mutual trust and confidence" which is an implied term in law for any employment contract. Yes im sure they should of conducted an investigation rather than just cut your sick pay. That to me sounds like a disciplinary action taken without an investigation or disciplinary.

 

I also suggest you turn on your privacy settings so NOONE from work can see your profiles.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing in law says they have to have a meeting. So there's no breach of anything but good practice - which isn't enough for court.

 

I can also kinda see the bosses point - can't work, can play footie? I would be asking questions too. Admittedly he's done it in a right cak-handed way, but no - there's no case here.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I have five and a half years service. I thought about raising a grievance, but it states in the company handbook that an employee *may* be suspended without pay while an investigation into a grievance takes place. I can't really risk being suspended without pay.

 

If it turns out that they didn't follow the correct procedure by undertaking an investigation, do I have any grounds for a claim/complaint?

 

Also, I had a (civil) email exchange with the director where I explained my situation and asked him to change his decision, to which he refused. Would this class as an 'investigatory meeting'?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if your contract / employee handbook says sick pay is discretionary (and the majority do) you're stuffed. They followed your fit note instructions. That's all they have to do. Nothing more.

 

What qualifications does your advising friend have in HR?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspended Without Pay

 

That is also wrong as unpaid suspension is a disciplinary action.

 

I disagree with Emmzzi, if your sick pay is part of your T+Cs then to remove it is again a form of punishment without you having the oppertunity to respond to the investigation.

Employe relations act does force companies to have a Minimum Standard of greivance and Disciplinary procedure that they must abide by (unless it is summary dismissal for serious gross misconduct)

Edited by honeybee13
Link removed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I disagree with Emmzzi, if your sick pay is part of your T+Cs then to remove it is again a form of punishment without you having the oppertunity to respond to the investigation.

Employe relations act does force companies to have a Minimum Standard of greivance and Disciplinary procedure that they must abide by (unless it is summary dismissal for serious gross misconduct)[/url]

 

That's why I asked if it says "discretionary." If it does, no dice.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is discretionary, but I'm not sure that they followed my fit note instructions?

 

For the first two weeks I was signed off 'not fit for work', it has only been thereafter that I have been signed off on 'light duties'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I see what you mean. They used their 'discretion' not to pay me.

 

I suppose it only sticks in the craw a bit because my colleague (less than 3 months service) was given a months sick pay under very similar circumstances, while I have been vilified despite taking the advice of my doctor.

 

I guess that's the nature of work though? It helps to be related to your manager!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still a little confused here. Is removing my sick pay classed as a form of disciplinary action?

 

If so, then surely by ACAS guidelines they should have had an investigation and a meeting?

 

I realise it is discretionary, but having awarded sick pay can they just take it back under 'discretion' or would that class as disciplinary action?

 

I also read somewhere that there are grounds for discrimination if one employee is given a benefit, but another is denied under similar circumstances?

 

Apologies for all the questions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not disciplinary. Did you get SSP instead?

 

Not all discrimination is illegal. Only on race, gender etc grounds.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - I see you were offered SSP and took holiday instead. That's very fair - at my place you can't do that when unwell.

 

Really you have no case. Best to put your energy into join hunting, and next time ask the bosses opinion before, not after, the match.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered that by plastering it all over facebook you were rubbing your company's noses in the dirt and made your position extremely difficult by bringing them (in the eyes of some) into disrepute and it certainly hardens attitudes and stances. If you want a private life keep it private.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really pal. I didn't plaster it all over Facebook...I posted pictures only my freinds could see. I'm not friends with anyone at the company. As I had my doctors approval and my boss already knew I was playing, I don't really think it constitutes bringing the company into disrepute?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...