Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bank the cheque.  No doubt it will bounce - but you never know. When it bounces - that is when you are meant to access their website link and enter your personal details - but of course - DON'T.
    • Wayne Ting, chief executive of e-scooter firm Lime, says there's room for improvement. View the full article
    • If you are absolutely certain* that you were parked OK, write a letter of complaint to the Headteacher and copy in the Chair of the school governors.   If you or the car were identifiable in any way from the photo (eg visible registration number, driver's face etc) I would very politely write that you resent the untrue suggestion that you had parked/had stopped/were waiting in a way that contravened any traffic regulations, and that you are sure that the school will understand that you would like an apology and a correction to be printed in the next newsletter.  (You can also clearly state that you were identifiable from the photo because other parents have mentioned it to you).   See if that works.   You don't want to go to court for defamation as you'll need access to about £10k in fees before you get out of bed.  You just want an apology and a correction.  If what you've told us is accurate, I don't see any reasonable school failing to say sorry.     *My wife is a former school governor and my experience listening to her is that very very few parents actually understand the meaning of the no stopping/no waiting signs and road markings outside schools.  Don't complain unless you are sure you weren't stopped where you shouldn't have been.
    • And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)   And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.   (And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).
    • It's up to you if you want to pay £300 you don't owe plus whatever Unicorn Food Tax with no basis in law whatsoever that they will have made up in the Letter Before Claim.   We'd prefer you didn't.   But you have received a LBC so it's make your mind up time.   So please    - post up photos of the signage in the dark that you'll have taken two months ago (post 14)    - post up details of planning permission for their signs you'll have found out after you got onto the council, again two months ago (again post 14)    - also let us know if you agree with Brassnecked's excellent letter or if you'd like to tweak bits depending on what you've found out    - upload the LBC.  Some of them are appallingly drafted and invariably contain Unicorn Food Tax which is all useful extra ammo    - also, where are you living now (post 35) and are you comfortable with legal communications arriving at your parents'?   If you look in our PPC Successes thread at the top of the page, you will see 275 times these cheats have been seen off with their tails between their legs (and all had the same "well known legal companies" (ho! ho!) on hand).  In reality 275 times is a massive underestimate, in all 275 cases there was a "moment of victory" IYSWIM where the PPC were thrashed in court or discontinued a claim or were called off by a supermarket chain, etc., etc.  There will have been at least that number again where they were told to Foxtrot Oscar and then crawled back under their stone.  They are eminently beatable but logically when you're in legal dispute you have to put some graft in to beat the other party.
  • Our picks

can an employee record meetings without consent


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2354 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just as a enquiry can anyone tell me can an employee record meetings between ourselves and him, and pass them on to third parties???

 

 

or indeed communicate meetings over phones.

 

 

either the above without consent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unless they have notified the other party that a recording will be made, that gives the other party the opportunity to withdraw.

 

 

A recording can be made without notice but it must be for own use only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they cant

 

got a manager dismissed for that

 

transpired he had been routinely doing so to all employees he had been issuing discipline too

 

he must have your permission.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly you physically *can* and I suspect your question is "what are the repercussions"?

 

It might be helpful to know why you are asking?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not illegal to record a conversation which you are party to covertly - but it is unlawful to disclose that recording or a transcript to a third party.

 

 

If no one is aware that you are doing it, they cannot complain.

 

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4310

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

reason is we are the employer, we have an employee that is on long term sick, he is not fit for duty this has been confirmed by OC and Doctors. however he has broken English (we have always been able to communicate with him before the sickness and other issues started! - for 6 years) over the past 3 he has claimed he doesn't understand. We ask him in for meetings he sits there in the chair hands crossed smirking at us, not answering any questions. we within days will receive a fully itemised letter on the meeting, he takes no notes at all. There is a friend parked in a car outside every meeting. I have not given consent to be recorded or a transmission of the meeting to happen ;-( we have been told by his union rep - if we terminate his contract he has already planned his tribunal claim ! We have really tried hard but I do not know what more I can do.

Edited by Conniff
Corrected typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hire an impartial translator!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A termination of employment because of capability is a genuine reason for termination. I would do as above, get your meeting either on paper in his language and give that to him and get someone who speaks the language to interpret.

Record the meetings yourself.

 

 

If you fear he is using a transmitter to send the meeting to a friend or relative in a car, hold the meeting in a part of the building where it is unlikely the signal can penetrate if possible.

 

 

It would seem that the employment law has swung a bit too much in favour of an employee. If a tribunal is held, you have to pay win or lose and that seems unfair to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What adjustments have you made for the employee in light of his limited English?

 

It sounds as though you potentially have grounds to dismiss him, so it all rests on the procedure. Did you offer him the right to have a friend present to help translate, for example? That would assist your case greatly, as you will need to demonstrate to a tribunal that he could reasonably understand the disciplinary proceedings and you gave him an adequate and fair opportunity to respond to them.

 

I once saw a case where an employee from Wales who had worked in the UK for a number of years demanded a Welsh translator at his disciplinary hearing because all of a sudden he had started to struggle with English! A ridiculous request, but it certainly strengthened the employers case in allowing it, as it made the employee look rather unreasonable...

 

Anyway - a failure to respond during the hearing could amount to insubordination. Without his answers, you would have to make the decision to dismiss based on medical evidence which says unfit to return. It might be worth holding a final hearing, offering him a friend to translate, and then dismissing him if he won't cooperate. No tribunal will expect you to carry an employee indefinitely, so you need solid evidence that he has been off for a significant period, that medical evidence says he cannot return and that you cannot continue to employ him (with reasons as to why).

 

And make sure every meeting is minuted!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I have been off ill and I am sorry for the delay.

we have stopped allowing a friend in with him, for the reason she does and can not translate she talks for him, and he doesn't know whats being said or written ,

We have arranged and interpretor, it really doesn't worry me if he is recording as we have nothing to hide, its more the moral fact and I would expect to be asked

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...