Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescott/provident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3616 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello can anyone advise me?

 

In desperation I took out a £300 provident loan a tChristmas,

 

I have been paying it off every week missing just 2 payments when the agent did n't call.

 

I had a marketing call from Provident today saying that as I was such a good payer that they would offer me a £900 loan

- I'm not that silly, I know the scary interest rates,

I told them so and said I would n't rule out a small loan in the future

( I can't get an overdraft so sometimes its a case of having to go to provident).

 

I have just had a rather rude text from my agent saying that I should have approached her for a loan

 

and as I was n't paying what I owe she could n't give one to me anyway(not that I wanted one)

 

I am confused why their office says I have an excellent paying record yet I get this rude text from their agent.

I have told her to suspend collections from my home until I get a print out from head office.

 

Now, I am pay £10.50 per week, I am considering offering them a lower amount per week

( I know the loan would take longer to pay off) and putting the rest into a credit union, should I do this,

will this offer of lower payment appear on my credit file?

 

I don't want to cut my nose to spite my face as I have been grateful for the provident in the past when no one else would help.

I would appreciate your help

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Provident will settle for lower payments, however arrange it through head office and not the agent. The credit union is a great idea if you can put a few quid aside weekly/monthly as it will be possible to avoid high interest loans in future.l

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, will it go on my credit file,.

I am thinking of offering £10 per month to provident and putt the other £30 in credit union and use that at Christmas instaed of high interest provident,

 

Just had a really rude text from the agent.

 

I told her I was n't expecting her to call on tues and had just got back from looking after my mum,

she sent a rude text saying " what do you mean you were n't expecting me!

 

I always call on a Tuesday after a bank holiday then says shes been at the hospital all day

and its been nice knowing you!! and please do contact head office! and and stop wasting my time

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agents are on commission and will scare and threaten you into paying silly numbers. If you get an abusive call, log it and report them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can anyone point me in the right direction?,

 

I had a £400 loan from Provident and was paying it weekly,

 

I was more than half way through the repayments when I fell out with the agent,

because I had queried the amount owing.

 

Long story cut short, I am now being chased by Wescott,

the ring me every day and send text messages,

I have blocked them on my mobile but they keep ringing my house phone.

 

I did try and deal with it in the beginning by contacting provident who just denied that their agents had acted inappropriately.,

I have been overwhelmed with family problems etc.

 

Wescott say I owe £410, this is £10 more than I borrowed in the first place,

although I know with their horrendous interest rates this may be correct?.

 

Where do I start ?

 

not sure what to do first, but its got to the point where I dread people coming round in case they ring,

 

I never answered it, but its still awkward , its an automated thing, says " If you are Mrs *** press 1 etc, I just put the phone down.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this on your credit file?

 

have wetcloths bought the debt or only collecting?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have your provident book?

 

Is this the same loan you took out Xmas 2012 and had the nasty txts from the agent about

 

If i remember correctly you pay something like £3.50 a week for 53 weeks for every £100 borrowed so £400 would be £14 per week but by half way through you should be down to about £371 so not that far out.

 

As Dx says , do Wets own the debt or collecting on behalf, have they sent any written communication?

Do they call you on your landline or mobile?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, letter says we have been instructed by our clients to collect the debt, bit ambiguous , I suppose it could mean either?

 

That means they are collecting on behalf of , however do they refer to their clients as provident or someone else?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so you can check your book to see if the balances match and if not you can challenge what you owe. I would also write to them about the harassment by telephone

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387367-Harassment-by-Telephone-(update-21.04.2014)

 

You can edit this as needed or in the library there are a lot of other letters that can be useful

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you . I have now joined a credit union and would recommend it to anyone, they just take my payment plus an amount for a savings account out every payday, I have had no problems.

Meanwhile, I realise I signed up to a sky high interest rate, I wonder if there is anything that I can do to challenge? also not sure if book is absolutely correct, for example she took it on a couple of occasions ' to bring up to date' then did n't return it for a few weeks, keep saying she had n't taken it, I did get little receipt cards but not sure I have them all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...