Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Dave, greatly appreciated!   Working on the SAR right now.   I've attached my images in a PDF NCP.pdf 
    • The questionable service from the surgery you mention TJ could do with their methods being passed onto the Care Quality Commission and PALS.    Watching Panorama this week the shared ownership scheme needs a serious review to ensure the system helps people not hinder. There must also be developments in the shared ownership scheme with unsafe cladding compounding the terrible financial situation the developers and landlords have put people in.   From the Grenfell enquiry, to me the cladding was mis sold as being entirely inflammable and wondered if the process of fitting the cladding, the council also had the responsibility of conducting their own fire tests. In addition to those thoughts, I'm sure the fire service and resident associations made it clear over time for Grenfell and other developments in the UK buildings did not comply to stringent fire and safety regulations.
    • Good morning.    I would like some advice please.    I recently (19th nov) bought a Samsung Galaxy S20+ from currys. I did open and set up the phone to try it out but 1) wasn’t keen on it and 2) had trouble with the usb connection when trying to connect with my car stereo.   I decided that I would seek to return it, but only on trying to return it came across the stipulation that if data/software has been installed then a refund would not be issued and after calling was told this was due to GDPR. I did point out to them that phone providers will issue full refunds even if the phone has been set-up and also that in order to be able to test the phone it requires setting up and software/data being installed but was told that it’s their policy.   I acknowledge that I may have handled it more than is reasonable in a shop as you wouldn’t be able to install software in a store, however the phone did need to be set up in order to test it, the phone has been returned back to factory settings and didn’t leave a case or the plastic film for the two days I used it for. Therefore I do not believe it was handled more than necessary.   Having looked at the CCR and CRA I called back to state that their store policy is super erred by the previously mentioned regulations and that their policy contradicts the Consumer Regulations Act.   As you cannot properly test the phone without having to install software on it, their policy creates an unfair term which I told the customer service agent over the phone who spoke to her manager and told me to contact their legal department.   I am still within the 14 day notice of return period so wish to try and preferable use this route.   Any advice at all please?
    • Here is all the details (hopefully) in one post.   The Ford Kuga was purchased from Fast Motor Finance LTD Crawley on 8th September 20 Mileage at purchase was 109520 through HP fiancé via Advance Finance Grimsby   The car was covered by a 6 month warranty that includes engine & gearbox but excludes clutches, flywheels or any wear & tear (Taken from the garages website)    Service History:   08-04-2013 Pre-delivery Inspection 26-11-2013 12809 Service (no paperwork just stamped book) 09-07-2014 25963 Service (no paperwork just stamped book) 09-02-2015 36814 Service (first Invoiced service but no paperwork just stamped book). Gearbox service would of probably been done here but can't verify. 16-02-2016 50385 Service  (Full service, paperwork and stamped book) 31-03-2017 64680 Service (Full Service, paperwork & stamped book) 13-02-2018 76988 Service ( Full service with gearbox service, paperwork & book stamp) 29-03-2019 92592 Service (Full service with paperwork & book stamp) 11-02-2020 106322 Service (Basic Service, no paperwork but book stamp)   As there was no paperwork for last service the garage which serviced the car were able to email over that the service was a basic oil & water change and that the gearbox oil and filters was not changed.   At the beginning of November the gearbox started making some noise and was having trouble selecting gear.   The finance company  asked for the car to be taken to a VAT registered garage to find out what the problem was and not to drive it further.   After the garage looked at the car the estimate was for a full service of the gearbox which would be £370 but because it had gone over Ford recommended mileage for the gearbox there would be no guarantee this would clear the problem and that would mean a replacement gearbox would be needed.   Since picking the car up in September the car has driven 1500 miles.   Spoke to the garage as was informed that the car was over 30 days old and there was nothing they could do and the gearbox would not be covered by the warranty as this would be normal wear and tear!   The warranty company said exactly the same and would not entertain us.   After countless calls and emails to Advantage finance a formal complaint was raised and they finally agreed to send one of their mechanics to inspect the car last week 19th November. The mechanics ahs reported back to Advantage that the noise is down to wear and tear and Advantage have closed the complaint and are sending out a deadlock letter that includes a copy of the mechanics report.   Would their mechanic have to be DEKRA registered to complete the report or Advance Finance own mechanic?   This now means that the car cannot be driven is still at the garage and will need a minimum of £370 to make it driveable on a car that has been driven 1500 miles since collection without a guarantee that this will cure the problem.   We are both key workers that need the car to travel to and from work as well as take our son to nursery, and at the moment having to rely of friends and family to help out with lifts.   I have spoken to Ford and they have told me these car need to have the gearbox serviced at around 35k and at a very maximum of 37.5k and have put this on letterheaded paper, I have also emailed a couple of other Ford and independent dealers to get details of this as well.   Would it be worth getting an AA or RAC inspection done to check the gearbox and to see if there is any other problems with the car.   Thanks again to everyone epically dx & Bank fodder who have helped me with advice.   JJ    
    • nothing they can do anyway so..   dx
  • Our picks

Capital One Lowells and debt outstanding dispute


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2246 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

OK guys, here is one that you may wish to give me some advice on.

 

I took out a credit card with Capital One a good few years back not quite sure when as I cannot find any of original paperwork

but I would imagine it would be around 2004 -2005.

 

Unfortunately, I became disabled in 2007 and was unable to work and eventually I defaulted on my card in 2008.

 

I worked out a plan to pay a token amount each month and this was accepted but I was also getting periodic calls

asking for a financial status and asking if I could pay more.

 

I got fed up with the calls and wrote to them stating that all communications must now be in writing

and telephone calls would not be entered into.

 

I was then getting letters asking for a financial statement which I duly completed and gave them.

Then I was getting letters still asking for this despite the fact I had already sent it to them this was happening on a regular basis.

 

They seem to lose things or state they haven’t received it.

I wrote countless letters of complaint about their service but to no avail

 

Finally, I think they were getting fed up with me complaining and I got a letter back in late 2009

stating the debt was now with a DCA (Welcome Solutions).

 

I wrote to Capital One stating that as far as I was concerned I had fulfilled my end of the bargain

and that I would not be dealing with Welcome Solutions and that I would continue to send my monthly payment to Capital One

and they can do with it what they like.

 

At the same time I wrote to Welcome Solutions telling them amongst other things that I had a dispute with Capital One a

nd I would not be dealing with their company.

 

I got a letter back from Welcome Solutions to say they had passed the debt back to Capital One,

I guess they did not want involved.

 

After that Capitol One still kept messing me around with financial statements etc until I was totally hacked off with it all.

 

In February 2010 I sent them a letter together with a cheque for £15.00.

 

In the letter I stated clearly that the £15 pounds was for full and final settlement of the account

and I quoted the account number, I also wrote the same statement across both sides of the cheque.

 

They cashed the cheque and that was the last I heard from them.

 

Over four years later I receive a letter from them last month stating they had sold the debt to none other than Lowells.

 

The next day I receive a letter from them saying how they bought the debt and I am liable for the outstanding balance.

I wrote back to them stating that as a far as I am concerned the debt was cleared back in 2010,

I did not at this point tell them my reasoning behind this.

 

I told them I want nothing to do with them and I won’t be contacting them again and suggested they contact Capital One.

 

I also sent a letter to Capital One stating that I do not owe them anything and it was up to them to dig through their files

to find out why as I was not doing their job for them.

 

I eventually received a letter back from Rachael Cornfield and she said she had found my letter of February 2010

regarding the full and final settlement payment but Capital One do not have to accept the terms within the letter

and she quoted their terms and conditions This is what she wrote –

 

‘Under General section C , it states Any delay in enforcing our rights under this agreement shall not affect our rights.

We may also accept late payments or partial payments, or cheques or money orders marked as payment in full or something similar,

without losing any of our rights under this agreement’

Therefore, as we have not agreed to the terms and conditions of your payment, the remaining debt is still outstanding’

 

As far as I am concerned, by virtue of the fact that they presented the cheque to my bank

and were paid the money they therefore accepted my payment terms.

 

If under their terms and conditions they were not going to accept my payment and the content of the letter

which clearly stated it was for full and final payment then why didn’t they simply return the cheque with a letter to say

that they did not accept this?

 

Capital One have never been in touch regarding this matter until now some 4 years later when

 

I received their communication last month stating they had sold the debt.

 

Any comments suggestion very welcome

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry to say that your action with the £15 isn't a full & final settlement.

 

These things have to be negotiated and agreed between both parties.

 

If it were me I would send Lowell a CCA request.

 

Also SAR to CapitalOne to see if there are penalty charges and/or PPI on the account which you could reclaim.

  • Haha 1

If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you write to them please make sure you do not acknowledge the debt. Cap 1 do seem to struggle to provide compliant s78 documentation.

 

Get that cca request off and let us know what they send.

How much are they claiming ?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites
When you write to them please make sure you do not acknowledge the debt. Cap 1 do seem to struggle to provide compliant s78 documentation.

 

Get that cca request off and let us know what they send.

How much are they claiming ?

 

Hi thank you very much I will get the cca request off asap the alleged debt is £2411

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi thank you very much I will get the cca request off asap the alleged debt is £2411

You need to be very careful with Lowell considering the size of the debt, especially if you are a property owner.

Lowell issue Statutory Demands quite often on sizeable debts.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes Lowell are known for issuing statutory Demands so that is why, IMHO it is important to keep the dialogue open with them. Get the CCA request off, if what they send back is good you may have to set up a repayment plan, if not good or a recon then ask them if they have the original .

 

If you have no assets then they are less likely to take action

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Address All correspondence to Ms Sara de Tute, Director of Legal & Compliance at The Lowell Group.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your support - Just to let you know I am disabled I do not work and I am on disability living allowance. I do not own any property or have any assets whatsoever, my car is a motobility vehicle so that cannot be touched. I think the worst they can do is bankrupt me for the sheer hell of it, but what good that would do beats me. I am 60 years old I wont ever work again and I have no interest in getting loans etc so my credit file being screwed up would have little to no affect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you all for your support - Just to let you know I am disabled I do not work and I am on disability living allowance. I do not own any property or have any assets whatsoever, my car is a motobility vehicle so that cannot be touched. I think the worst they can do is bankrupt me for the sheer hell of it, but what good that would do beats me. I am 60 years old I wont ever work again and I have no interest in getting loans etc so my credit file being screwed up would have little to no affect.

 

 

Hi, BR in your case would be pointless and costly so it is I think very unlikely that any such action will be taken.

 

 

Personally I would inform Ms de Tute Lowells Director of Legal and Compliance

of your circumstances along the lines of:

 

 

Dear Ms de Tute,

 

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

 

I refer to recent correspondence from Lowell reading an alleged debt for £ xxxx. xx allegedly arising from an account with Capital One Bank. I do not acknowledge any such debt.

 

 

For information and the avoidance of misunderstanding please note the following.

I am a 60 year old person disabled and will never return to work.

I do not own any property and have no realisable assets.

My income is from benefits only.

 

I do not have the means to satisfy the alleged debt and this situation will not change.

 

 

I suggest that Lowell takes a "commercial" view on the alleged debt and closes the file as any action Lowell make take will not achieve the result I seeks.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, BR in your case would be pointless and costly so it is I think very unlikely that any such action will be taken.

 

 

Personally I would inform Ms de Tute Lowells Director of Legal and Compliance

of your circumstances along the lines of:

 

 

Dear Ms de Tute,

 

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

 

I refer to recent correspondence from Lowell reading an alleged debt for £ xxxx. xx allegedly arising from an account with Capital One Bank. I do not acknowledge any such debt.

 

 

For information and the avoidance of misunderstanding please note the following.

I am a 60 year old person disabled and will never return to work.

I do not own any property and have no realisable assets.

My income is from benefits only.

 

I do not have the means to satisfy the alleged debt and this situation will not change.

 

 

I suggest that Lowell takes a "commercial" view on the alleged debt and closes the file as any action Lowell make take will not achieve the result I seeks.

 

Thank you for that encouragement I will draft a letter and get it off on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the same with this bunch, Fletch is right, Cap One could not supply even an application form just a set of terms and conditions no name on it or nothing, told them they had not complied they then sold to Lowells who said they are waiting for a CCA from Cap One who are searching there very very deep archives hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Told them best of luck as Cap One had been searching for it for 18 months prior to selling Lowells a lemon. I took mine out about the same time, at some Airport if I remember !!!!!!! The only good thing I can say about Lowells is they have an e-mail address and are happy to correspond that way. A friend of mine at work has had his Cap One written off by Lowells due to No CCA forthcoming, they say it made business sense to close it and that they would not be selling it on either, !!!!!!!!! And it's in writing I was amazed. ( there may be hope )

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites
Had the same with this bunch, Fletch is right, Cap One could not supply even an application form just a set of terms and conditions no name on it or nothing, told them they had not complied they then sold to Lowells who said they are waiting for a CCA from Cap One who are searching there very very deep archives hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Told them best of luck as Cap One had been searching for it for 18 months prior to selling Lowells a lemon. I took mine out about the same time, at some Airport if I remember !!!!!!! The only good thing I can say about Lowells is they have an e-mail address and are happy to correspond that way. A friend of mine at work has had his Cap One written off by Lowells due to No CCA forthcoming, they say it made business sense to close it and that they would not be selling it on either, !!!!!!!!! And it's in writing I was amazed. ( there may be hope )

 

 

Hi Hippy, How's life?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Hi all

 

Out of the blue Cap One cancelled the alleged outstanding debt, no reason given. Thanks for everything guys

 

 

Sounds good Hippy!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
Address All correspondence to Ms Sara de Tute, Director of Legal & Compliance at The Lowell Group.

 

This may help some people - http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/sara-de-tute/18/697/471

 

http://www.bcllegal.com/the-brief/a-day-in-the-life-of/the-brief-a-day-in-the-life-of-sara-de-tute-%E2%80%93-legal-compliance-director-at-lowell-group

 

Or just sort them out for yourselves - https://www.google.com/search?q=sara+de+Tute

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...