Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tangliss, if you can't upload the letter, could you tell us what the heading is please? My understanding is it should say 'Letter before claim' or similar. HB
    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halfords, Need an exchange ***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3612 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caggers

 

Heres my problem, I got a bike last weekend from Halfords on the cycle to work scheme,

I got my bike and it seemed fine, but when i rode it only down my road, i niticed the suspension seemed to be alot softer than it was (should).

So my question is, am I entitled to an exchange for another bike?

I have searched forums and I cant seem to find a answer.

Please Help

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive got a bike item which I need to return, and the Halfords Refund Policy seems quite good, http://www.halfords.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CSCategoryDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-1&catalogId=21202&categoryId=292509&topCategoryId=292503

 

It says you must have proof of purchase and original packing.

 

What bike is it ?. Im a keen rider and Halfords are known for selling some bit dodgy cheap bikes, but everyone has to start somewhere.

 

On more expensive bikes, the rear suspsension will be by means of a shock, coil or air, on air one the 'softness' can be adjusted by increasing the air pressure 'psi' but on cheaper and more heavy duty Downhill bikes (like mine), you change the spring depending on the type of riding and your weight, for example 300-250 lbs would suit a light rider and 500-600 lbs would suite someone heavier.

 

If its a cheaper bike (and my apologies if its not), then I think that the shock will be something quite cheap with few/no adjustments and I'd guess that they all would come with a standard spring (prob in the mid range region).

 

If you want a good, perfect fitting bike I suggest you visit a more specialist local bike shop and not Halfords, but alas decent bikes are not cheap, mine was £2000 plus...

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks andydd, you have just shed some light on my situation. I phoned my Halfords store, and the guy I spoke to was a little arrigant to say the least, he pretty much told me, cutting it short that if I was happy with the bike before I left the store and thats that. And that I can bring the bike down later today he will look at it as he said it seems like the suspension needs adjusting.

The thing is the only adjustments he can make on it is something to do with the recoil of it. To be honest all I want is the suspension to he harder. It seems soo much effoert is used when I'm riding.

 

Oh I almost forgot to mention I have a Carerra Crossfire 2

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sash

 

Go armed with some legislation, if he says the following:-

 

'cutting it short that if I was happy with the bike before I left the store and thats that'.

 

Quote SOGA (1979) :-

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/sale-of-goods-act

 

All goods must be:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only problem I for see here is halford just issue the bike. The contract I think is with the cycle to work scheme

So would the op not have to take it up with them ? As it's them that paid for he bike as a loan paid direct from wages

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point 2ltr16valve

 

See how it goes with Halfords, if your still not happy, write to 'Cycle to Work Scheme', quote SOGA.

 

Only problem I for see here is halford just issue the bike. The contract I think is with the cycle to work scheme

So would the op not have to take it up with them ? As it's them that paid for he bike as a loan paid direct from wages

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that SOGA would atually have effect here,

 

It appears to me that the bike is as described, fit for prpose and of satisfactory quality, its just that the buyer believes that the fork is too soft for him. (Unlike more expensive bikes/forks, it prob only comes with a one-size does all fork).

 

Sorry I misread the original post, having looked at the bike, its not the rear suspension, there is none, there is only front fork suspension. With cheap bikes like this, the forks will be pretty basic and there wont be many settings, it appears to be a Suntour NVX fork, it has a rebound setting (not recoil), this doesnt really affect the 'softness' of the fork but it adjusts how fast the fork returns to its original setting.

 

With high-end forks, you normally adjust them the same way as I mentioned above for rear shocks, (i.e with Air or by changing the spring), but i doubt whether the spring can be changed in the Suntour fork.

 

If you really want forks where you can adjust settings to get them just right you will have to fork out (I know !) more momney, this is what I have http://www.tredz.co.uk/.Fox-Racing-Shox-36-Van-180-FIT-RC2-Suspension-Fork-2014_64707.htm

 

Are you sure the fork is too soft ?, I have mine set up pretty soft and go through most of the travel (180mm) when out on a ride (admittedly, often some pretty extreme stuff). The fork may also have a pre-load setting, this squashes the spring down a bit and will make it a bit firmer.

 

So to summarize I believe Halfords are not being too unreasonably here, you did try the bike out first and prob should of spent longer, perhaps ride round the car park before you bought it. Whether they do allow a refund or exchnage depends less on soga and more on their goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so doing research on halfordds policy, my cycle to work scheme policy and sale of goods act, it apears in my favour.

I'm going down there after work today, I will keep you all updated.

I might even upload a video of what happens on the world of you tube

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that SOGA would atually have effect here,

 

It appears to me that the bike is as described, fit for prpose and of satisfactory quality, its just that the buyer believes that the fork is too soft for him. (Unlike more expensive bikes/forks, it prob only comes with a one-size does all fork).

 

Sorry I misread the original post, having looked at the bike, its not the rear suspension, there is none, there is only front fork suspension. With cheap bikes like this, the forks will be pretty basic and there wont be many settings, it appears to be a Suntour NVX fork, it has a rebound setting (not recoil), this doesnt really affect the 'softness' of the fork but it adjusts how fast the fork returns to its original setting.

 

With high-end forks, you normally adjust them the same way as I mentioned above for rear shocks, (i.e with Air or by changing the spring), but i doubt whether the spring can be changed in the Suntour fork.

 

If you really want forks where you can adjust settings to get them just right you will have to fork out (I know !) more momney, this is what I have http://www.tredz.co.uk/.Fox-Racing-Shox-36-Van-180-FIT-RC2-Suspension-Fork-2014_64707.htm

 

Are you sure the fork is too soft ?, I have mine set up pretty soft and go through most of the travel (180mm) when out on a ride (admittedly, often some pretty extreme stuff). The fork may also have a pre-load setting, this squashes the spring down a bit and will make it a bit firmer.

 

So to summarize I believe Halfords are not being too unreasonably here, you did try the bike out first and prob should of spent longer, perhaps ride round the car park before you bought it. Whether they do allow a refund or exchnage depends less on soga and more on their goodwill.

 

Hang on there one minute andydd, read my first post, i said it felt fine in the shop, but when i got it home and rode it down my road the susspension seemed alot softer. therefore a change in the bike without me doing anything wrong, so its faulty. Its not I beleive the forks are too soft for me, they are too soft for me but werent in the shop

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible that the forks have developed a fault but very unlikely, suntour who make them are a decent brand, and those forks are quite simple, they consist of a simple spring, and it's not really possible for it to go softer, as I said before, more high end forks can be adjusted by changing the spring to suit riders weight and riding style. I suspect there is nothing wrong with fork and you are just not used to it. Have a google of fork suspension set up, it's normal for a fork to compress when you sit on the bike a certain amount, it's called sag, mine goes down about a 1/4 and I can push it through all the travel easily.

 

Perhaps take the bike to halfords or another bike shop and see what they think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got an exchange with another but same model of bike and suspension is loads better......One thing I have learned......never go to halfords

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news. They haven't got the best reputation for bikes but to be fair they are ok for spares and other bike parts but it's always best to visit a friendly local bike shop or perhaps someone like chain reaction who even supply return postage stickers for returns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news. They haven't got the best reputation for bikes but to be fair they are ok for spares and other bike parts but it's always best to visit a friendly local bike shop or perhaps someone like chain reaction who even supply return postage stickers for returns.

 

I agree

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...