Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A South Korean court sentenced Lee Jae Yong to two and a half years in prison. View the full article
    • To add to the weight of evidence this is fraud, do you have (or can you get) proof of what the cost of the Special Delivery was?. If they paid for the weight of an envelope containing a piece of paper, they won't have paid for the cost of sending a laptop (given it is much heavier) ...... You should also contact ActionFraud.
    • @dx100uk, I'm afraid you've got this wrong. My fear of compromising my defence wasn't with regards my response to DCB Legal's initial letter per se. It was more in reference to any subsequent advice posted on this thread by other forum members and I was only being wary due to the numerous instances when some have cautioned about parking companies and their legal reps trawling these pages to stay a step ahead.   As I did also state however, I'm happy to provide full details of that initial reply to DCB Legal and have therefore reproduced it below. Thanks.    
    • China's economy grew at 2.3% for the year, making it the only major economy to see growth last year. View the full article
    • more: extend the contract line by....   contract exists between the claimant and the landowner which assigns the claimant the right to enter contracts with the public and make claims in their own name. I put the claimant to strict proof that such a contract exists.   1st few lines like this:   1.I am the defendant in this matter.   Any documentary evidence relied upon by me in this, my statement will be referred to and produced as exhibits RSS1, exhibit RSS2 and so on, and are labelled and attached accordingly.   All exhibits are listed below List of Exhibits    2. In this Witness statement, the facts and matters stated are true and within my own knowledge, unless indicated otherwise.   3. I am the registered of the vehicle, xxxxxx   4. I am not liable to the claimant for the sum claimed, or any amount at all.   just sign and date at the end no statement of truth is needed sorry.   dx        
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Workman never supplied carpets after deposit paid for carpets


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2426 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A flooring contractor undertook some work fitting a wooden floor for us, and agreed to supply carpets. We paid in full for the floor which he fitted as agreed. And a deposit for the carpets of a thousand pounds. To cut a really long story short he never supplied any carpets and the floor lasted a month before buckling and peeling away. As a result we are taking him to the small claims court to recover the money, but are now concerned that because we are suing the individual rather than the company he owns - he may wriggle out of it. His defence is merely that he never received any money from us or entered into any contract! (Even though we paid to the company account via bank transfer. We are feeling pretty desperate so any help greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Naomi

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will advise as soon as they are available.

I've added a title for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello there,

 

Do you have anything in writing from them at all?

 

We never received a written acknowledgement of the works in terms of a formal contract, but there is plenty of e-mail and text correspondence that refers to the works to be carried out. E-mails discussing dates, e-mails where he requests funds are paid, as well as an e-mail saying that he cannot fit carpets before Christmas because they aren't in stock. We also have a letter he has written when he says that he isn't going to rectify the problem because he doesn't think it's his fault, and declaring that he does intend to return part of our carpet deposit when he sees fit. It's now completely extraordinary that he is saying he never received anything - when we have a bank statement to prove it, but I fear he is so dishonest, that any way of getting out of it he will. Especially if somehow we should have put the name of the company rather than the contractor on the claim. Any thoughts very gratefully appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A person can't be dissolved to avoid any outcome as a company can. Should you win, and it seems as if you have enough evidence, and he refuses to pay, you can get bailiffs involved to visit his home and take possessions or his car.

If the amount owed is £750 or more, you can file to make him bankrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n001a-eng.pdf

 

'but I fear he is so dishonest, that any way of getting out of it he will. Especially if somehow we should have put the name of the company rather than the contractor on the claim. Any thoughts very gratefully appreciated.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you paid the company bank account, that would be a reason for him to say you should have sued the company and not him personally. But it is really up to him to raise it as an issue. If he wanted to use this argument he should have said so in his Defence. If he tries to make this point in court, you can explain your side of the story why you think you contracted with the individual and not with a limited company.

 

Personally I'd let the small claims process continue. Usually you are much better off having a CCJ against an individual rather than against a company.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
As you paid the company bank account, that would be a reason for him to say you should have sued the company and not him personally. But it is really up to him to raise it as an issue. If he wanted to use this argument he should have said so in his Defence. If he tries to make this point in court, you can explain your side of the story why you think you contracted with the individual and not with a limited company.

 

Personally I'd let the small claims process continue. Usually you are much better off having a CCJ against an individual rather than against a company.

 

Thank you very much. We will proceed in that case. I really appreciate your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
As you paid the company bank account, that would be a reason for him to say you should have sued the company and not him personally. But it is really up to him to raise it as an issue. If he wanted to use this argument he should have said so in his Defence. If he tries to make this point in court, you can explain your side of the story why you think you contracted with the individual and not with a limited company.

 

Personally I'd let the small claims process continue. Usually you are much better off having a CCJ against an individual rather than against a company.

 

I think he has raised it by saying he never received any money or entered into a contract. He's saying in effect the contract was with the company, the company received the money. Is there a particulalr reason you are suing him and not the company, e.g. evidence that the contract was with him in his personal capacity?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...