Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

partner moving in


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

 

back in march me and my partner broke up. she started a single claim with an income for 2014-2015 is £6000 she was awarded 70wtc and 115ctc. we have 2 children. however i want to move back in, my income is £16000. now if we live together we are entitled to no working tax but 90 ctc. how does this work? as soon as we start the claim will we recieve the 90pw or will it be less because of how much she has already recieved this year? also does anyone know how long we will go without money when we make new claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your partner will need to end her single claim and you both then reclaim as a couple. For the new award to be decided can take from 2 weeks to 12 weeks. The award won't be based on what your partner has already received, but will be based on what you both earned in the last tax year.

  • Haha 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

So on entilted to it says 150 a week entitlement. It shud be at that rate ish and not reduced because shes been iverpaid? Do you know this as a fact. Btw im not being rude its just that my life feels like a mess and we need to get right this. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

A single tax credit claim and a couple tax credit are two separate claims. Overpayments or payments on one cannot effect or be recovered from the other. Your rate of tax credits on the couple claim will be calculated by your and your partner's gross income in the previous tax year (unless your income this tax year are estimated to be significantly less than last tax year, in which case one the claim is processed, you can request it be calculated on this year's estimate).

 

 

I can't speak to the accuracy of the 'entitledto' calculations though.

 

 

ETA: regarding knowing as a fact, I've worked as a benefit adviser for 10 years, plus several years before in the DWP. If you need to be sure about the calculations please take advice in person from a benefit adviser, for instance CAB, welfare rights etc

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

A single tax credit claim and a couple tax credit are two separate claims. Overpayments or payments on one cannot effect or be recovered from the other. Your rate of tax credits on the couple claim will be calculated by your and your partner's gross income in the previous tax year (unless your income this tax year are estimated to be significantly less than last tax year, in which case one the claim is processed, you can request it be calculated on this year's estimate).

 

 

I can't speak to the accuracy of the 'entitledto' calculations though.

 

 

ETA: regarding knowing as a fact, I've worked as a benefit adviser for 10 years, plus several years before in the DWP. If you need to be sure about the calculations please take advice in person from a benefit adviser, for instance CAB, welfare rights etc

 

 

 

So what happens to the money she aleady been paid this year will it or any of it need to be paid back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should it need to be paid back? If it's what she was entitled to for the period she was single, then she hasn't been overpaid for that period. As has already been said, this is a new joint claim going forward so what she's had is irrelevant.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happens to the money she aleady been paid this year will it or any of it need to be paid back?

 

 

Your new couple claim won't start from april 6th 2014, it will start on the day you make the claim, for instance 20th May 2014. Any tax credits your partner has received will apply from April 6th to 19th May, then your couple claim will apply from 20th May onwards. There is no overlapping to the claims.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your new couple claim won't start from april 6th 2014, it will start on the day you make the claim, for instance 20th May 2014. Any tax credits your partner has received will apply from April 6th to 19th May, then your couple claim will apply from 20th May onwards. There is no overlapping to the claims.

 

 

well estellyn thank you very much for miss informing me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well estellyn thank you very much for miss informing me.

 

Would you care to elaborate on that?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The threshold for WTC as a couple is approx £18,000 so if you and your partners combined income is £22,000 then there would be no WTC paid. Please note this threshold may differ depending on working hours/disabilities etc

 

There are entitlement tables here to give an idea of what you could get but if you want a more accurate calculation then ask the tax credit helpline. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/tax-credits-entitlement-tables

 

When you change from a single claim to a joint claim, providing the change is updated within 1 month, the single claim would end and the joint claim would start the following day. Each claim would be calculated using these dates. Depending on when the change is reported there could be an overpayment but not in all cases.

 

There is also info here on repaying overpayments

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/leaflets/cop26.pdf

 

You should note from this that if there is an overpayment in the single claim, this can be recovered from your joint claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting about the change in single claim overpayments being able to taken now from couple claims. But as this wasn't a concern of the OP, not sure what he feels I got wrong. Always keen to be corrected if I do get something wrong.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting about the change in single claim overpayments being able to taken now from couple claims. But as this wasn't a concern of the OP, not sure what he feels I got wrong. Always keen to be corrected if I do get something wrong.

 

I'm sure it was only this year (last year at a push) that it changed. It was a good idea, there was quite a lot of people that wanted it that way rather than making direct payments but weren't allowed to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was only this year (last year at a push) that it changed. It was a good idea, there was quite a lot of people that wanted it that way rather than making direct payments but weren't allowed to.

 

 

Thanks for highlighting it :)

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what I would like to clarify is that in entitled to we are quoted 150 which is about accurate. If we notify the tax credits the day I moved in would these payments be reduced due to the high amount she already has recieved? Or will they work it out proportionately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she had an overpayment, this could be recovered from your new claim. If she doesn't have an overpayment then the payments from the single claim wouldn't affect those in the joint claim.

 

Without knowing the full circs I can't say for definite the £150 is the correct amount. Eg you quoted a household income of £22,000. Is that for this year or last year? If this year, was last years figures any different?

Are there childcare costs?

Anyone disabled?

How many hours do you both work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your partner had forgotten to inform them of a change in circumstances or there was an admin error. If it's down to their error she could challenge having to repay any resulting overpayment.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I thought you said hers was £6000 and yours £16000? So that would be £22,000?

 

As stated already, overpayment would occur if she hadn't updated changes at the time. For example, if you move in and she didn't tell them for a month, any money received from when you move in until she tells them will be an overpayment.

 

Her awards notices would show if she currently has any outstanding overpayments.

 

If she reports the changes on time and has no outstanding overpayments then anything she was already paid wouldn't affect your new claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...