Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

October 2012 we bought a Logik brand LED TV for £199.99

All was fine until

 

 

April2014 when the start up failed.

NORMALLY there's a red light which comes on and you press either the button on the TV

or remote to switch on.

The light goes blue and the TV comes on.

 

Now it just stays red and no start up happens.

 

We went to Currys where we bought it and they said they could send it off to their repair centre

and have it checked but it would cost us £95 which would be refundable if they find a fault.

 

 

They also said if we wanted, we could have it checked by an independent engineer

and get back to them.

 

Now we thought 18 months is NOT an acceptable time for a TV to last

so I emailed their customer services who just said the same.

 

I got some advice from the citizens advice who have a template letter

which refers to the Sale of Goods Act.

 

I sent this to Currys head office (registered post) and

 

 

they have taken two weeks to call us with the same information,

plus claiming they do it everyday and people easily have their £95 back.

Really, EVERYDAY? Is that really a selling point?

 

We have since purchased a Sony TV (went halves on a special offer in Tesco),

so we don't have £95 to spend on a repair.

 

We could get a quote and report from an independent engineer but it's more money,

which we don't have.

 

I still have the Logik TV, well packaged and tucked in a cupboard.

 

What I need to know is, is there any point in getting an independent repair?

 

Has anyone done this themselves and been successful in receiving either a refund

or exchange from Currys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first instance you would need to give them the opportunity to repair the TV, if they can all well and good, if they can't then that would be the time to go down the SOGA route, whilst CAB are good, sometimes they tend to give bad advice.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the item has become faulty after 6mts

 

 

its down to you as the buyer

to get a report down

to fwd to them

and get it repaired/replaced or refunded

 

 

under SOGA as they think fit.

 

 

if they agree either of the above, the cost of the report is refunded by them too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For once it sounds like Currys have actually been owning up to their responsibilities right from the outset. The only real issue was that their own report fee, £95, is a bit excessive given that these are usually £50-60 from an independent engineer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

engage brain >>>>>

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no-one is wrong here

 

you just poss mis read.

 

dx:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
A £200 TV would not be expected to last 6 years surely?

 

I would say that you are correct however, even a £200 TV should last longer than 18 months. For that money I would expect about 3 years before a fault showed up.

 

My suspicion is that some products are designed to fail after a short amount of time or they use products that are far too cheap to be reliable in the long term.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you pay more money doesn't mean it will last longer or that you would get a more favourable judgement.

 

No there isn't but price paid reflects how long it is likely to reasonably last. You wouldn't get a judge rule in your favour in the 6th year if you'd paid £200, but you would if you paid £600+ imho
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...