Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard PPI reclaim - help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3580 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have held a barclaycard since I was a student in 1998.

 

In 2006 I was sold a ppi on this card over the phone.

 

At the time I was working full time on a fixed term contract.

 

I had been working at this institution for 1 year.

I was eligible for generous sick pay and redundancy pay.

 

I applied for a sar on this account and received a sheet titled 'advised insurance sales details'.

 

THere follows a series of brief questions and yes or no to indicate my answer.

 

Firstly, it states this was an advised sale.

 

Next come the following:

 

Q: full time.

A: yes

 

Q: if you we're unable to work because you fell I'll or had an accident would your income still allow you o make payments on your barclaycard.

A: yes

 

Q: 27-52 weeks.

A: yes

 

Q: do you have savings or other income you could use to make payments on our card.

A: yes

 

Q: unemployment insurance.

A: no

 

Q: accident insurance.

A: no

 

Q: sickness insurance.

A: no

 

Then it says customer accepts recommendation

- now, based all all this info

- do I have a claim for mis selling.

 

As far I can i can see I think I may but could do with some advice please.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your answers, it would seem already that they have recorded the information erroneously because you weren't exactly in full time employment. You were on a fixed term contract.

It maybe that the information was recorded incorrectly - either by accident or deliberately - or maybe more likely, that their questionnaire wasn't constructed adequately so as to allow this kind of question to be asked or such an answer to be recorded.

 

It seems that you may have a claim for misselling. Also, was this a cold call? Where were you at the time? Were you at work - which wuld have made it difficult for you to have a meaningful considered conversation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long was the actual term of the contract?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your answers, it would seem already that they have recorded the information erroneously because you weren't exactly in full time employment. You were on a fixed term contract.

It maybe that the information was recorded incorrectly - either by accident or deliberately - or maybe more likely, that their questionnaire wasn't constructed adequately so as to allow this kind of question to be asked or such an answer to be recorded.

 

It seems that you may have a claim for misselling. Also, was this a cold call? Where were you at the time? Were you at work - which wuld have made it difficult for you to have a meaningful considered conversation?

 

Many thanks for your reply.

 

Maybe it was a mistake on my part in that they asked if I was full time and

I said yes as I worked full time hours (37hours) and therefore wasn't part time.

 

I definitely wasn't asked about my contract type as I would have answered correctly.

 

It was indeed a cold call.

 

From what I remember it was in the evening and I do remember them being very pushy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long was the actual term of the contract?

 

It ran from April 2005- October 2006 then was renewed in the October for a further 5 years (it was a research contract) but I was employed by a big university

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they recommend insurance just based in the fact I didn't have sickness cover

(that was the only negative answer I gave)

- they didn't ask anything about my employer cover

and seemed to ignore the fact I had other means of financial support

- and does the fact this was clearly an advised sale mean they are at fault

for not having asked the right questions or is that my responsibility?

 

I am just trying to ascertain if I was being really stupid

or I was sold something that was totally wrong for my circumstances

Link to post
Share on other sites

the simple fact you had existing sickness cover etc,

should be enough for a valid reclaim.

 

have a read of this from the FOS website.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOOh credit card

 

OK if it were me i would do the following

 

1) "Sar All Le Thingz" Subject Access Request everythign to do with the Credit Card

2) CCA request

 

Now you have the infomation you need (if you dont already)

 

3) work out PPI and charges resulting from it and submit a PPI complaint

4) Reclaim any credit card charges such as over limit, late payment charges and returned item fees AND either Interest charged on the charges by the CC OR more simpler in my mind, Interest of Restitution

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOOh credit card

 

OK if it were me i would do the following

 

1) "Sar All Le Thingz" Subject Access Request everythign to do with the Credit Card

2) CCA request

 

Now you have the infomation you need (if you dont already)

 

3) work out PPI and charges resulting from it and submit a PPI complaint

4) Reclaim any credit card charges such as over limit, late payment charges and returned item fees AND either Interest charged on the charges by the CC OR more simpler in my mind, Interest of Restitution

 

Thanks everyone! You've all been brilliant. I'm just going to go for it - and list all my reasons and see what happens!! Nothing to loose!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, you are on a winner I think!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would not use the scattergun approach.

 

use the fact you had works cover only

 

then bring in the rest later if needs be

 

use the FOS Questionnaire not the BC one too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would not use the scattergun approach.

 

use the fact you had works cover only

 

then bring in the rest later if needs be

 

use the FOS Questionnaire not the BC one too

 

Okay - shall I just not mention the fixed term contract thing at all? Can you bring In other reasons if the initial one isn't accepted? Is the bc form not the same as the fos one? Good tips! Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this sound weak? I can't answer the questions on what questions i asked and what was told during the sale as i really can't remember:

 

I was sold this policy over the phone by a call centre agent. i remember the agent being very pushy and stongly advised that i should take out this insurance. I decided to take out this insurance because i was advise to do so and trusted that it would be right for me and my circumstances.

 

And why i feel i was mis-sold:

I believe that this policy was mis-sold to me. Having seen the questions asked in a telephone sale transcript i am confused as to why the agent advised i took the policy out . At the time of taking out this policy i was employed by --------- and in the unfortunate situation where i would have been unable to work due to sickness or an accident i would have been covered by a very generous sickness policy of 28 weeks full pay and 24 weeks half pay. I know this was an advised sale as i have a transcript of the sales questions which states it was an advised sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were employed full time with cover provided by the employer, you feel that you were incorrectly advised by the call centre sales person so this is clearly mis selling.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

the full time thing is really starting to confuse me. my employer refers to full time as 37 hours and then you are either on an open ended or fixed term contract. should i mention this too? they asked me during the sale if i was employed full time and i said yes as as far i understood it, i was!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say 37 Hours is full time the contract was extended to 5 years, a lot more job security than many people have so it is correct.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much for your patience with me - i know i am totally clueless!! Shall i only bring up the fixed term contract thing up if needed? i see on the barclaycard form they have fixed term and full time as two separate options!!! on the form for the for it is either employed or temporary? was i temporary?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

 

and watch for probing phonecalls

 

everything in writing

 

put the phonedown!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

 

and watch for probing phonecalls

 

everything in writing

 

put the phonedown!

 

Thought as much. Will they accept the fos questionnaire or will they insist on filling out their own one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the FOS questionnaire, this contains all the information that they require. (if there is a reference on their questionnaire you should copy this across). Also keep a copy so if the case does need to go to FOS you don't have to fill in a second one

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...