Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells Not Provided Original Documents, but placed Default on Credit File


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Lowells have been pursuing a debt they have bought.

 

I sent a 'prove it' letter with my pound postal order.

 

After waiting the 12 working days,

i had received nothing other than ' We're still looking, Bear with us' letter.

 

I then sent the failure to respond to my legal request letter and account has entered default.

 

Both templates i copied from here.

 

Since then i have had two 'Still looking' letters, and this week they sent one saying that it has been 8 weeks since they received my 'complaint' ??

but they are still gathering the necessary information.

 

They also include a little booklet from The Financial Ombudsman Service, should i desire to escalate my complaint.

 

My first request was dated 18/2/14 and the default letter dated 6/3/14.

 

Now, on checking my credit file on Noddle, i can see a default from Lowells dated 22/4/14 , some time after my second letter.

 

Can this be correct?.

 

I have also been searching for a template letter to request the removal of the default from my credit file.

 

Incidentally they haven't returned my postal order yet.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to respond to a cca request does not prevent them from marking your file as default, if that is a true reflection of the account. The only sanction for failing to reply is that they cannot obtain a ccj

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default should be dated the same as the original default, so 22/4/14 isn't right.

 

What is the date of the original default? who was the original creditor, the approx amount & the date of last payment. Also what type of account was this for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Looking at the file now it says,

 

Account type... Credit Card ( it doesnt say who with and i only have a bank card for accessing my money)

 

Account number....*************0260 0 (it has that zero spaced from the other numbers)

 

Account Start Date....15/8/2001

 

Opening Balance £2,557

 

Payment Frequency....Monthly ????

 

Date of Default ......2/12/2010

 

Default Balance....£2,557 ( its the same figure as the opening balance)

 

I bank with HSBC and i have for many years,but i dont have credit cards with them or anyone else

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you don't know this debt or the card

 

so you've never paid it?

 

so its statute barred

 

that was the letter you should have sent.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

would it be now too late to send the Statute Barred letter?

 

Am i right in thinking they waited to see the outcome before placing the item on my credit file?

 

which is now showing the dates and amounts?.

 

like my first letter said, i didn't recognize any debt with them.

 

If i had a credit card,

surely the amounts would be different if i had gone into arrears?

 

It looks like a card that hasnt been used since 2001 ???.

 

Where would i go from here?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob the old LLoyds/tsb one or the Cap1 card you have threads about here.

 

scan up the letter please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where has this card from 2001 suddenly come from?

The entry by Lowell is Not a new default or default date just an update from Lowell this was according to you CRA statement defaulted in 2010.

Who was this unused card with please?

 

 

If no payment or unequivocal written acknowledgment has been mad on this account in 6 clear years (5 in Scotland) it is Stat Barred.

 

 

I suggest a letter along the lines of:

 

 

Ms Sara de Tute

Director of Legal & Compliance

The Lowell Group.

 

 

Ref: Use theirs>

 

 

Dear ms. de Tute,

 

 

I refer t recent correspondence from Lowell in regard to an alleged debt arising from a " credit card" please take note I have no knowledge of any such debt and all liability is denied.

 

 

Having reviewed my credit history I have concluded that if any such alleged debit did exist it is now statute barred therefore I will not make any payment now or in the future.

 

 

Lowell will confirm that it has closed the file on this alleged debt within 7 working days.

 

 

( Lowell may claim that the Limitation period starts from the default date but they are wrong the date a payment was due and not made, after which no further payment or written acknowledgment was made.)

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...