Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claiming a pension early, on grounds of ill health


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I left BT via voluntary redundancy in 2009, & my pension was frozen. I had a few health conditions whilst there. (One pre-existing, one as a result of an accident whilst working) I'm currently in my 30s. TPAS advised I may be able to claim an Ill-Health pension for deferred members, the 1st step was to obtain a copy of the rules from Accenture (HR for BT).

 

Accenture have stated that "there are no written rules, we would arrange for an Occupational Health Service (OHS) Report to be compiled, after a medical assessment." I'm familiar with these assessments, they are HEAVILY biased towards the company, & against the individual. This was my experience, & their general reputation across BT.

 

My GP is fully aware, & supportive, of my various health complaints. But if I attend one of these OHS medicals, with a biased healthcare provider, I feel I'd get the same poor treatment I've seen before. & a report that would dismiss them.

 

If anybody has any experience or advice here, I am currently self-employed, doing a Job I can work around my good & bad days. I need to see if I qualify, based on a fair & impartial assessment, which I wouldn't get from an OHS referral.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You ned to look at a copy of the pension rules. the pension scheme will be managed by a group of trustees. Do you know the name of the scheme you are in? if so then you can probably find the rules online or ask BT or Accenturs again to provide them and if they dont you go to the Pensions Ombudsman and make a complaint that the Company and Accenture will not make them available. This takes time but they will be ordered to get you a copy because the law says they should.

The person you communicated with is either blowing smoke or is a complete tool when they say there are no rules, the Pensions Act determines the basic rules and they join the dots. Write to them again saying your next step is the ombudsman and you will probably get the info you need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gavva.

 

I agree with Ericsbrother, you need the Pension Scheme rules on ill-health retirement. I don't know what's wrong with you, but I think IHR could be fairly rare in your 30s. It could be useful to know whether you can claim IHR if you can't carry out your 'normal occupation' whichever that is, or 'any occupation' if that is the way the scheme rules are worded.

 

All schemes have rules and there may be nothing preventing you approaching the Trustees direct once you have more information.

 

Do you still have a scheme booklet? That could be helpful.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the TPAS website advice on IHR. One of the things it mentions is that your illness or disablility needs to be permanent.

 

It's just possible that your section of the BT scheme has other rules, but until you get a copy you won't know.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules will say that it's at the discretion of the trustees based upon satisfactory medical evidence. If the trustees decide that they require an OHS report then that is what you will have to do. There is no legal right to an ill health ER pension, but it is a benefit that can be provided under the rules. The rules however will not stipulate the process but will be 'high level' so to speak. The rules aren't online but you can request them and they will certainly be provided without question.

 

Before you go to the ombudsman you will have to have completed the process, been rejected (why do you think you will be its not even a company decision?) and then go through the schemes complaints procedure.

 

This is factual information by the way not an opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies everyone, much appreciated input - ericsbrother - I would go with 'the person I spoke to being a tool' (BT were looking for a company to make a worse job of HR than they already did, & found it in Accenture, woeful) The scheme is run by "BT Pension Scheme, BTPS". However Accenture are the "point-of-contact". Hb, thx for your help on this one also - that's 2 shandies I owe you! :) I've been through the paperwork I have, but nothing is mentioned with regards to Ill-Health retirement. I found this:

 

http://www.btpensions.net/149/section-c-member-booklet

 

Page 15 covers Ill-Health retirement, One of my conditions is Life Long Asthma (since age 5) which is regarded as moderate/severe & permanent, & classed as a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act. The other issue is a lower back musculo-skeletal problem, involving disc damage & muscular / sacral facet problems. (L5S1). I am in possession of a Medico-Legal report, related to a claim against BT following an accident in 2007, where the Lead Spinal Surgeon states " at this time, the injuries sustained & the associated low-back problems may be regarded as permanent . "

 

ocelot, I feel that I have a fair & reasonable case to put to them, & that I'm not trying it on here. However, the OHS are known for being heavily biased - this is my concern regarding the outcome of their specific medical. I'll have a dig around for the contact details for the BTPS directly, & try & remove Accenture from the process, if possible. Thx again to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I think what you need is the specific scheme's definition of 'ill-health'. As has already been said, ill-health can be as serious as terminal illness progressing down to serious illnesses.

 

I have limited experience of this, but I think for an employer's scheme it would usually depend on whether you can work rather than what illnesses you have. Also, as you have left, it wouldn't be as generous as it would for someone who was still employed.

 

The scheme Trustees don't have to use the same OH provider as the company, although sometimes it happens that way. The whole point of having trustees is that they're independent of the company itself. If you can't get any sense out of Accenture, you may need to approach the trustees. Details of that should be in the pension scheme booklet.

 

I hope that makes sense.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OHS are appointed by the Trustee rather than the company. You can't cut out Accenture, they administer the scheme on behalf of the Trustee and the Trustee will simply refer you to them. What is your concern with Accenture? They have no vested interest in whether your claim is successful or not and they are working for the Trustee. I understand that you think they gave you duff information about there being 'no rules' but I think what they meant is that the application process is not set out in the rules which is correct, the rules are just high level. I think you misunderstood what they were saying to you.

 

 

I can assure you that if you go to the Trustee direct they will just pass your query back to Accenture as the Trustee does not administer the Scheme themselves. They are however the decision makers and neither Accenture nor BT will have any influence whatsoever on the outcome. Also as part of the process your GP records will be considered by the OHS.

 

 

Just follow the process as it stands and see how you go. I think you are unduly concerned about the influence of BT here, they don't have one in relation to the pension scheme once you have left and Accenture have no vested interest either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

BT offer an excellent pension scheme especially before 1984. Things you need to know before making a choice are:

 

Are you married or have dependent children?

 

If you don't you could opt to to a final salary transfer out. In a final salary scheme most of the value is tied up in spouses or dependent benefits. If you are never going to use this it might be worth looking at this option.

 

Depending on how ill you are you may be able to get a better lump sum and impaired life annuity (income). If you are seriously ill (normally with a potential life expectancy of under 12 months) you may be able to claim the full pot as a tax free lump sum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...