Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • p'haps not the best thing to do just use the N244.and the ex160 let them sort it out don't complicate things..   don't worry about the bailiffs there isn't really anything they can do there is no right of forced entry upon consumer debt CCJ enforcement.    
    • again you appear not to be understanding things.....   a default does not go statute barred - as carefully explained in post 4....once it reaches its 6th birthday it along with the associated account will be removed from your file. that happening has no effect on the debt itself. it does not mean it is no owed.    your debt is NOT statute barred it has a CCJ . should the claimant fail to enforce the CCJ by it's 6th birthday, when, as with a default, it falls off your credit file, then they would need to return to court to do so. and again that happening has no effect upon the debt itself.   they both operate under the same ICO rule, quoted as in post 4..   All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years  has passed from date of default, whether paid off, paying now or not.  . This is so that someone who continues paying something  - even after 6 years from default  - should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default  and ends up with a clean file after 6 years. 
    • Pleased to say that the default has gone from my credit report due to being SB. My Experian credit score is now 978 out of 999 and excellent. Experian doesn’t show my 2 x CCJ’s. Equifax’s shows just 1.    my question is this.... clearly the debt is still owed for the SB debt, the CCJ is still live until June next year.   Can I make an offer of 10% to settle the debt now that it’s SB? If so is there a letter template that I can send to them to make such an offer?   thanks in advance 
    • Your position is not untenable in any way. You have already mitigated partially any impending disaster by opening another non Paypal linked bank account so they cannot arbitrarily seize what they want.   First thing to remember you are in control here. Whatever you offer to pay them must be something you can reasonably afford even if its only a pound a week and you must pay it to Paypal. If like me they freeze your account then there is no way you can reasonably pay them. They are not going to give you another account to pay it into.   The reason I got into difficulties with them was because I had recurring large payments being made to a supplier of mine which continued after I was rushed into hospital for series of emergency operations. When I came out of hospital Paypal had simply frozen the account which I discovered when I tried to pay money into it to alleviate the huge deficit that had accrued. So I paid nothing of what I owed. I received about 4 or 5 threatening missives which I ignored as well as any phone calls. I tried for several months to make payments into the account and in the end I gave up. Despite all the threats nothing actually happened.   If you read all the answers to your posting as well as all the other Paypal posts I doubt you will find any evidence of Paypal doing very much to enforce outstanding balances and funnily enough they do not make it easy for those that wish to repay them as I discovered.   So stop getting yourself into a flap over something that is very unlikely to be nothing more than a storm in a tea cup.   Make or start you offer to re-pay them at a figure you can easily afford then forget all about them except to make your regular payment if you can still do so.   DO NOT under any circumstances get yourself deeper into debt over this.
    • she certainly hasn't any authority to 'fine' you. what was in the contract regarding vacating the property by when?  
  • Our picks

gavva1

Claiming a pension early, on grounds of ill health

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1986 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I left BT via voluntary redundancy in 2009, & my pension was frozen. I had a few health conditions whilst there. (One pre-existing, one as a result of an accident whilst working) I'm currently in my 30s. TPAS advised I may be able to claim an Ill-Health pension for deferred members, the 1st step was to obtain a copy of the rules from Accenture (HR for BT).

 

Accenture have stated that "there are no written rules, we would arrange for an Occupational Health Service (OHS) Report to be compiled, after a medical assessment." I'm familiar with these assessments, they are HEAVILY biased towards the company, & against the individual. This was my experience, & their general reputation across BT.

 

My GP is fully aware, & supportive, of my various health complaints. But if I attend one of these OHS medicals, with a biased healthcare provider, I feel I'd get the same poor treatment I've seen before. & a report that would dismiss them.

 

If anybody has any experience or advice here, I am currently self-employed, doing a Job I can work around my good & bad days. I need to see if I qualify, based on a fair & impartial assessment, which I wouldn't get from an OHS referral.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You ned to look at a copy of the pension rules. the pension scheme will be managed by a group of trustees. Do you know the name of the scheme you are in? if so then you can probably find the rules online or ask BT or Accenturs again to provide them and if they dont you go to the Pensions Ombudsman and make a complaint that the Company and Accenture will not make them available. This takes time but they will be ordered to get you a copy because the law says they should.

The person you communicated with is either blowing smoke or is a complete tool when they say there are no rules, the Pensions Act determines the basic rules and they join the dots. Write to them again saying your next step is the ombudsman and you will probably get the info you need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gavva.

 

I agree with Ericsbrother, you need the Pension Scheme rules on ill-health retirement. I don't know what's wrong with you, but I think IHR could be fairly rare in your 30s. It could be useful to know whether you can claim IHR if you can't carry out your 'normal occupation' whichever that is, or 'any occupation' if that is the way the scheme rules are worded.

 

All schemes have rules and there may be nothing preventing you approaching the Trustees direct once you have more information.

 

Do you still have a scheme booklet? That could be helpful.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the TPAS website advice on IHR. One of the things it mentions is that your illness or disablility needs to be permanent.

 

It's just possible that your section of the BT scheme has other rules, but until you get a copy you won't know.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules will say that it's at the discretion of the trustees based upon satisfactory medical evidence. If the trustees decide that they require an OHS report then that is what you will have to do. There is no legal right to an ill health ER pension, but it is a benefit that can be provided under the rules. The rules however will not stipulate the process but will be 'high level' so to speak. The rules aren't online but you can request them and they will certainly be provided without question.

 

Before you go to the ombudsman you will have to have completed the process, been rejected (why do you think you will be its not even a company decision?) and then go through the schemes complaints procedure.

 

This is factual information by the way not an opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The permanent thing depends on the rules from scheme to scheme. They often say something like unable to carry on the occupation you were in or were trained to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies everyone, much appreciated input - ericsbrother - I would go with 'the person I spoke to being a tool' (BT were looking for a company to make a worse job of HR than they already did, & found it in Accenture, woeful) The scheme is run by "BT Pension Scheme, BTPS". However Accenture are the "point-of-contact". Hb, thx for your help on this one also - that's 2 shandies I owe you! :) I've been through the paperwork I have, but nothing is mentioned with regards to Ill-Health retirement. I found this:

 

http://www.btpensions.net/149/section-c-member-booklet

 

Page 15 covers Ill-Health retirement, One of my conditions is Life Long Asthma (since age 5) which is regarded as moderate/severe & permanent, & classed as a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act. The other issue is a lower back musculo-skeletal problem, involving disc damage & muscular / sacral facet problems. (L5S1). I am in possession of a Medico-Legal report, related to a claim against BT following an accident in 2007, where the Lead Spinal Surgeon states " at this time, the injuries sustained & the associated low-back problems may be regarded as permanent . "

 

ocelot, I feel that I have a fair & reasonable case to put to them, & that I'm not trying it on here. However, the OHS are known for being heavily biased - this is my concern regarding the outcome of their specific medical. I'll have a dig around for the contact details for the BTPS directly, & try & remove Accenture from the process, if possible. Thx again to all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I think what you need is the specific scheme's definition of 'ill-health'. As has already been said, ill-health can be as serious as terminal illness progressing down to serious illnesses.

 

I have limited experience of this, but I think for an employer's scheme it would usually depend on whether you can work rather than what illnesses you have. Also, as you have left, it wouldn't be as generous as it would for someone who was still employed.

 

The scheme Trustees don't have to use the same OH provider as the company, although sometimes it happens that way. The whole point of having trustees is that they're independent of the company itself. If you can't get any sense out of Accenture, you may need to approach the trustees. Details of that should be in the pension scheme booklet.

 

I hope that makes sense.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OHS are appointed by the Trustee rather than the company. You can't cut out Accenture, they administer the scheme on behalf of the Trustee and the Trustee will simply refer you to them. What is your concern with Accenture? They have no vested interest in whether your claim is successful or not and they are working for the Trustee. I understand that you think they gave you duff information about there being 'no rules' but I think what they meant is that the application process is not set out in the rules which is correct, the rules are just high level. I think you misunderstood what they were saying to you.

 

 

I can assure you that if you go to the Trustee direct they will just pass your query back to Accenture as the Trustee does not administer the Scheme themselves. They are however the decision makers and neither Accenture nor BT will have any influence whatsoever on the outcome. Also as part of the process your GP records will be considered by the OHS.

 

 

Just follow the process as it stands and see how you go. I think you are unduly concerned about the influence of BT here, they don't have one in relation to the pension scheme once you have left and Accenture have no vested interest either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BT offer an excellent pension scheme especially before 1984. Things you need to know before making a choice are:

 

Are you married or have dependent children?

 

If you don't you could opt to to a final salary transfer out. In a final salary scheme most of the value is tied up in spouses or dependent benefits. If you are never going to use this it might be worth looking at this option.

 

Depending on how ill you are you may be able to get a better lump sum and impaired life annuity (income). If you are seriously ill (normally with a potential life expectancy of under 12 months) you may be able to claim the full pot as a tax free lump sum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...