Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Thank you for all your advice have sent the SAR and our solicitor has gone back saying costs associated to DOV are unreasonable and to share the full breakdown. Southern Land Security has appointed Brendan Millward to carry out the DOV . Oppose to the person you mentioned Helen.    We are awaiting the breakdown  Thank you  Sorry Brendan Milward 
    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Student Loans Company and ESA


Lula
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, and Hello to those of you that know me already!

 

My daughter has a loan with SLC and had to drop out of Uni after a year do to Mental Health Issues, that was about 4 years ago, she is still having these issues and has been on ESA for most of this time.

 

Because of this,

I have been dealing with the debts that she built up (due to mental health issues) and

 

I have managed to sort most of them apart from SLC,

 

I have given them proof that she is on ESA but I wont given them her address

as she is a vulnerable person and isn't tough enough to deal with it.

 

She gets about £52 per week to live on,

 

I pay her rent so that I know she will have a roof over her head,

everything else, gas, electricity, food, clothes, travel, she has to pay for.

 

This morning SLC have phoned me to say that it is their Policy that even if you are on benefits,

you have to pay something and he suggested between £10 and £30 pounds per month!

 

I asked him if he could live on that amount of money and he declined to answer,

 

I also told him that if he kept ringing and harrassing me for payment, I wouldnt be amused.

 

I also stated that once she was fit for work and was earning, she would make arrangements to pay.

 

He them told me that they might have to take further action,

I wished him luck taking a vulnerable person to court for a debt that they wouldn't

be able to pay because they are on benefits.

 

I asked him to send me an income and expenditure sheet

but I could do with some advice as I am not sure where to take it from here.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you sure this was the SLC and not a fleecing DCA?

 

SLC should know that no payments are due because she is not earning any wage.

so thus below the threshold

 

somethings not right here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are right, pretty sure it was Drydens Fairfax, going to call SLC and give them a earful, thanks DX X

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoken to them, it WAS the SLC,

 

I re iterated that she has no money,

 

they said that as it was an overpayment they will continue to chase !

 

I am getting sent an income/expenditure form today.!!

 

So cross

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoken to them, it WAS the SLC, I re iterated that she has no money, they said that as it was an overpayment they will continue to chase ! I am getting sent an income/expenditure form today.!! So cross

 

Interesting to note that the email that was sent through with the IE form came from rgo_ collections@slcompany

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

overpayment...

 

that's an oddball one for SLC..

 

you are under NO obligation to fill that form out.

 

pers i'd be sending SLC an SAR

 

something is not right here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly there is an overpayment because she dropped out after a year. If she completed the first year then didn't go back, there will be an overpayment for the period covering the summer holidays.

 

My daughter was in a similar situation in that she dropped out after a year

following which she claimed carer's allowance to look after me.

 

Despite being told she could not claim anything until the 1st September a

s she had received a full loan for the previous academic year,

SLC wanted the money back.

 

Our complaint went right through to whatever the independent tier is called (sorry, it's a few years ago now)

where they confirmed that it was an overpayment

but because of my daughters situation (carer, on benefits) it should have been written off.

 

I'll see if I can find any of the paperwork and expand a bit if you think this might be the cause of the problem.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

September?

 

'an' academic year ends in early july at the very latest???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

During a degree course the 'academic year' runs from September 1st to August 31st for SLC, Grant and benefit purposes.

 

I've looked out the paperwork, and my daughter's complaint went to the Independent Assessor.

 

She found that the University had (wrongly) reported that she withdrew from the course on the last teaching day of the year,

whereas in fact she 'withdrew' when she didn't arrive for year 2.

 

As a result, there was no overpayment.

 

Additionally she found that had there been an overpayment SLC should have used their discretion to write it off

because of the circumstances in which she withdrew (she needed to look after her disabled mother)

and that collection activity should have been put on hold whilst there was an ongoing complaint.

 

Outcome

- if the OPs daughter withdrew from the course after the end of the first year, there shouldn't be any overpayment.

 

If before the end of the teaching year, then her circumstances (withdrew due to health issues) should mean they write off any overpayment.

 

Complain to SLC, if you exhaust their complaints procedure, go to the Independent Assessor.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then uni [degree] is diff to say college and say HNC/HND etc

 

as the SLC stuff says [for those] it ends at the end of the teaching year.

 

there you've taught me something RMW!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...