Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Gross Misconduct ?? Opinions please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

 

To cut a long story short I am being formally investigated by another manager.

The company has a formal procedure in investigations and part of this is checking IT. They will find in the recycle bin pictures depicting the Boss in an uncomplimentary manner....I got rid of them a long time ago as they were innappropriate, but I did not empty the recycle bin!

I never sent them to anyone else or printed them but I'm sure that they will find them.

 

Do you think this would be Gross Misconduct ??

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

define "uncomplimentary" and please advise how you got them in the first place

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hilter and/or gengis khan style, I imagine?

 

Well, if found, I cannot imagine it'll do a lot for your working relationship with the boss, even if it isn't gross misconduct. It's going to make you appear vindictive and immature.. and also not fully occupied at work if you have time to do that.

 

Given that perspective, does it matter that much what any hearing would find?

 

So I think you are crossing your fingers that the IT check is not that precise.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Emmzzi,

 

there's always a lot of spare time in the role I fulfill and the firm are aware of this, half my job is sitting around doing nothing!

 

But Immature and vindictive is well put and about sums it up !

 

I have had a good 20+ years with this firm without any previous disciplinary issues or warnings, all tasks completed to budget and on time and I'd like that to carry on. But I don't think they will miss it so I am scared to death that this would be seen by them as Gross Misconduct. I believe I can only face summary dismissal for Gross Misconduct.

It's a big firm and I think that other than this issue I've not had anything to do with the Boss himself nor am I likely to.

 

 

I also genuinely suffer from acute anxiety and I am just bouncing around everywhere at the mo........

Link to post
Share on other sites

If only my boss could see the things my workers have created about him.... Some of them were pretty hilarious.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno. Im a system Administrator, so even if he tried he would never see them. But he's just like any other main boss. Sits in an office all day or travels from site to site for pointless meetings. So he'd probably never see them unless he paid a fortune for forensic level analysis. But it's doubtful that anything like that would happen unless the workers threw them on the accounting system machines.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Emmzzi,

 

there's always a lot of spare time in the role I fulfill and the firm are aware of this, half my job is sitting around doing nothing!

 

But Immature and vindictive is well put and about sums it up !

 

I have had a good 20+ years with this firm without any previous disciplinary issues or warnings, all tasks completed to budget and on time and I'd like that to carry on. But I don't think they will miss it so I am scared to death that this would be seen by them as Gross Misconduct. I believe I can only face summary dismissal for Gross Misconduct.

It's a big firm and I think that other than this issue I've not had anything to do with the Boss himself nor am I likely to.

 

 

I also genuinely suffer from acute anxiety and I am just bouncing around everywhere at the mo........

 

 

I can't tell you that things you do, don't have consequences.

 

It will rather depend what they are looking for in the search, however.

 

Might get myself to the GPs if you are suffering atm.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think they'd have to be pretty desperate to pin something on you to go back through the entire recycle bin! Let's hope they only go back a few weeks, and that you've learnt that your time/ privacy/life is owned by them whilst on their premises.

 

Fingers crossed for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be a very odd one to try and pin you down with as some evidence of malice and attempt to disseminate it would normally be required to get any further than inappropriate use of company resources. The IT person would have a duty of confidentiality unless he was tasked to trawl though your computer files as part of a disciplinary investigation or other such formal reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To bring any disciplinary for this, they'd have to prove beyond doubt that you did it.

 

You could easily claim it was sent by email and you simply deleted them as soon as you saw them.

 

You could claim that someone else used that PC.

 

I work in the defence sector and even on our network I could plant files on someone else's PC. I could even edit the created and modified date to say it was done on a day that I wasn't even at work. Hell I could change the name of the person that created/edited the file to the MD of the company if I wanted to.

I once changed someone's desktop background to a giant photo of Big Bird and remotely flipped someone's screen upside down.

 

Don't accept anything and let them try to prove beyond doubt that it was you, because i'm telling you they can't. Anything is possible with 95% of commercial IT infrastructures and even the IT dept won't know all the hacks and backdoors in their own systems. That's why big companies pay people like my closest friends to actively hack their networks to help them increase security.

Edited by Strider440
Link to post
Share on other sites

To bring any disciplinary for this, they'd have to prove beyond doubt that you did it.

 

You could easily claim it was sent by email and you simply deleted them as soon as you saw them.

 

You could claim that someone else used that PC.

 

I work in the defence sector and even on our network I could plant files on someone else's PC. I could even edit the created and modified date to say it was done on a day that I wasn't even at work. Hell I could change the name of the person that created/edited the file to the MD of the company if I wanted to.

I once changed someone's desktop background to a giant photo of Big Bird and remotely flipped someone's screen upside down.

 

Don't accept anything and let them try to prove beyond doubt that it was you, because i'm telling you they can't. Anything is possible with 95% of commercial IT infrastructures and even the IT dept won't know all the hacks and backdoors in their own systems. That's why big companies pay people like my closest friends to actively hack their networks to help them increase security.

 

It's very easily proven. Most rooms that have computers in them are covered by CCTV, and then theres also the username that was logged in at the time of creation and deletion.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very easily proven. Most rooms that have computers in them are covered by CCTV, and then theres also the username that was logged in at the time of creation and deletion.

 

Any CCTV won't pick up that level of detail and probably got erased anyway.

Usernames and creation times mean nothing, as I said these can be spoofed VERY easily.

 

The IT dept will undoubtedly consist of graduates, who quite frankly memorised a few text books and don't really know a fat lot about the darkside of IT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cctv is used to see the person at the computer at a specific time. Most companies have software installed to see who is logged on and what programs were accesses.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The IT dept will undoubtedly consist of graduates, who quite frankly memorised a few text books and don't really know a fat lot about the darkside of IT.

 

... ahahahaha!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The IT dept will undoubtedly consist of graduates, who quite frankly memorised a few text books and don't really know a fat lot about the darkside of IT.

 

In most companies, thats spot on :) In the department i run, i never hire anyone unless they can show their aptitude and working knowledge and back it up with experience. Qualifications mean nothing to me if you don't have knowledge of the position in the real world.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to go the honest route on this, might be better, might not.

 

On the initial investigation I was dragged to the Operational Managers office where this appeared out of the blue. He did not offer me the help of a friend or a union rep and I was asked many questions which I answered truthfully. I explained the situation to them and after he discussed this with the other manager present he stated that he accepted what I had said about the situation and I was to see them in the morning. The director then came in and said that he would deal with this in the morning.

In the morning I went to the directors office where he threatened me with suspension with a view to dismissal, totally out of the blue!!

He started the 'investigation' all over again basically asking me the same questions that the OM had asked.

Eventually he said that he was putting it to investigation and that he wanted it 'boxed off' in a fortnight and then informed me 'you'll receive a punishment at the end, you will be punished'.

Now the handbook for managers involved in investigations is that they must be done with impartiality and integrity, I fail to see if it has already been decided prior to any disciplinary hearing that I am guilty and will be punished how this can be the case ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, not the letter of the law, but you've admitted it.

You're surprised he's angry, really?

 

Note, no right to be accompanied at the investigation stage; just the disciplinary.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But that's the point I didn't admit to anything, certainly not what they were saying and at the initial fact finding they accepted my version of events. No hearing as of yet and I'm guilty....you're right, not the letter of the law !!

 

My staff book specifically states that I have the right to be accompanied at all stages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused.

 

You already told us you did it, and you said you answered their questions truthfully - how is that aligned to not admitting anything? I think I've missed something here!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an initial investigation (which is an unrelated matter to the question asked in this thread) where the investigating manager was asked to look at my IT. Because of that I'm presuming they will find the pictures previously mentioned and forming the theme of this thread. I have not admitted anything about these pictures as I have not been asked about them (yet) but I will do so if and when asked.

 

The Director made his punishment statement prior to this initial investigation taking place (prior to anything really) from his 'fact finding' interview with myself. I never admitted anything and never would since the cause of the initial investigation was a mistake which even the Operational manager accepted, but evidently I am still going to be found guilty and punished in any case !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...