Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks

Lewt

Tesco mobile have sold debt to Lowell

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2014 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Their "requirements" concerning confirming your identity are rather onerous. They have to ensure that you are the correct person, but if it's from an address that they recognise, I don't see why they are asking for so much. It looks like a delaying tactic to me. The same with the PO - they could have filled in the payee & crossed it.

 

Write reminding them of their failure to respond to your SAR in the prescribed time allowed - tell them how long they have had - and that you require a response by . If that fails, a LBA telling them that you are taking them to court to force them to respond. They won't like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However, I have cleared out my office in between all this and found the contract, and receipt. It is a receipt for the phone which was a 32GB iPhone back in 2010. Do you think that will cover the receipt side of things?

 

Did you send them a copy of this?

And they still haven't supplied the info??


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guy's,

 

Yeah, I did send them the copy of the receipt. strangely enough today their version of what I asked for came. It was almost entirely incomplete. All it contained was a CS contact sheet record. Nothing else at all. I've sent them this in response.

 

letter before action

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account: *******

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 24.4.14. The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges for the period of the contact. June 2010 – May 2011

2) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to any legal action between you and myself.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

4) I’m aware you have passed my account to at least three debt collection agencies, you have provided no notes of documents of any communication between yourselves and them.

5) you have not provided the original signed, credit agreement.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject access request within 7 days, I shall apply to the county court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours faithfully,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me about it. It's all just been a huge waste of time. It seems they still don't have the credit agreement, which they need to pass on anything to anyone. Hopfully they also need it to have defaulted me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile contracts are service contracts, and as such they do not have to follow the rules of a credit contract of supplying a default notice.

 

 

Your best bet is to try to make an arrangement with Tesco to wipe the default as a gesture of goodwill, as they neglected to send the revised bill after they agreed to lower it to £400.

 

 

I would also argue that it was found unfair not to warn when using data abroad.

 

 

remember the compliment sandwich when trying to get something... don't be all negative, post some good points that they have (you catch more flies with honey over vinegar).

 

 

Keep us posted.


If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I got a letter from Lowell's last week saying that they couldn't provide me with the information i asked for (I didn't ask them for any, just sent a letter telling them it was in dispute) So I ignored. Got another one today wanting to re-start the process of them asking for money.

 

No reply from Tesco.

 

Not sure what to do here ? Getting the default removed is the aim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi All, I got a letter from Lowell's last week saying that they couldn't provide me with the information i asked for (I didn't ask them for any, just sent a letter telling them it was in dispute) So I ignored. Got another one today wanting to re-start the process of them asking for money.

 

No reply from Tesco.

 

Not sure what to do here ? Getting the default removed is the aim.

 

 

As has been stated this is not a credit account and is therefore not regulated as such..

 

 

I would try the advice given by Locutus in post 30#


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As has been stated this is not a credit account and is therefore not regulated as such..

 

 

I would try the advice given by Locutus in post 30#

 

Hi, Thanks for the reply. Do they not need to send me all the information they have then? I'm confused how they can effect my credit rating if they don't have a credit agreement?

 

Sorry for the questions I'm getting confused with it all? I sent them the SAR and they haven't done that? Should I not pursue that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its in the T&C of the mobile contract

 

theres very little yu can do to remove a default 'if'

that was how you operated the account.

i'e you missed something you should have paid.

 

is thee a balance outstanding?

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
its in the T&C of the mobile contract

 

theres very little yu can do to remove a default 'if'

that was how you operated the account.

i'e you missed something you should have paid.

 

is thee a balance outstanding?

 

dx

 

Yeah, there's a £400 balance. Which was the data that I wasn't happy with and never heard anything from them after I complained, to be told they would be contacting me.

 

I'm not sure what the point of sending an SAR was now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd get the data

 

there might be something to use against them.

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I'm trying to do but all they sent was a contact sheet from their customer service. I've written to them pointing out they've not provided me with everything but heard nothing in two weeks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you sent our SAR template

 

they have 40 cal days

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you sent our SAR template

 

they have 40 cal days

 

dx

Thats well passed. Or do they have another 40 days to respond to my reply saying they hadn't sent everything they should have? I only got a contact sheet from customer service nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

right sri misunderstood

 

they don't have an extra 40 days no.

 

they should have sent it all within 40 days

 

or advised it will take longer

 

 

why don't you give the ICO a ring.

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll do thank.

 

Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. is it worth replying to Lowells reminding them that I've not asked them for anything and that it's still in dispute? (it's clear Tesco are communicating with them)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No not really, the less you contact them, the less 'self importance' they bestow on themselves... Deal direct with Tesco.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've finally had a reply from Tesco.

 

I'm fairly sure whoever is dealing with it doesn't really get it.

 

The phone was bought in store not online and the dates they are saying things were totally sold are not correct.

 

When fredericksons first contacted me the account had not been sold they were acting on behalf of.

 

Any thoughts guys?

 

I really appreciate your help.

 

33ux6dv.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah the good old ''It's nothing to do with us any more'' con trick..

 

Unfortunately for Tesco, it still remains their sole responsibility, just because they have 'sold' it to a 3rd party does not relinquish them of the actions and responsibilities of the 3rd party, or of theirs.

 

You need to escalate this further within their complaints procedure,

IMO I would write back to Tesco and inform them that the sale of the account does not relinquish their responsibilities surrounding the account,

and they are wholly responsible for the actions of the 3rd party DCA they sold it too.

 

Highlight the inaccuracies in their letter, and that you are not satisfied with their standard response, therefore, they either investigate this further,

or provide you with a 'deadlock' letter so you are able to escalate this to CISAS and the FCA.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the response. I'm not sure what a dead lock letter is? I'm going to get something together this weekend and post it here before posting if that's ok with you guys?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A deadlock letter is simply a letter from them saying that they believe they are in the right, and if you still disagree then you should escalate it to the ombudsman and they give you the details.

 

Dear Sir/madam,

 

Thank you for your response dated dd/mm/yyyy the contents of which are noted.

 

I remain dissatisfied with your standard response as it fails to address any of my concerns adequately, and incorrectly makes assumptions about the account and how it was opened. Please send me by return of post a deadlock letter so I am able to escalate my complaint further to in order that my complaint be investigated properly and taken seriously.

 

Regards.

 

 

Or similar/edit to suit, you need to let them know that their pathetic response is far from adequate.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Well, I've had the deadlock letter. It's littered with errors, they seem to have included a little more information. Mentioning numbers that I've never owned. Still not information on what the charges are for, in one sentence claiming it was a 24 month in another a 12.

 

It just seems all messy, they're claiming I've had texts and letters, but I haven't and they haven't provided them in the SAR. In fact all they've provided in the SAR is them saying they've done that. Is this right? It's still inconsistent with my credit report which says the debt was defaults in Nov 11 and settled in march of this year, which is when I got a letter from Lowell's telling me they'd bought it. As you can see in this letter they are claiming they've sold it in 2011. There has been at least one other debt collectors that have contacted me, possibly too, but I remember frederickson's being around.

 

What do we think, chaps.?

 

ojm2iv.jpg

2cpcdhs.jpg

2q0pwg9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the last sentence really tell you all you need to know.

 

They have no original agreement, but can show a financial relationship between you and them if they were ever serious about getting the money they claim you owe.

 

Instead, to clear their books, they have sold it for pennies in the pound to a laughable DCA, although they are quite litigious can easily be seen off.

 

If Tesco are outside of the 40 calender day time period in which they have to supply all the info you have requested under the SAR, then you can escalate it to the ICO to investigate.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...