Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • New figures from the Insolvency Service show that early termination rates of IVAs have dropped 11% in the past year, while total IVAs have risen by almost 20,000 in the past two years. View the full article
    • Amigo Loans has posted an £87m loss for the nine months to December 31 2020, a 289% drop on the same period in 2019 View the full article
    • I've had a brief look over the thread and I see that there principle point is that he didn't take out insurance. Your answer to this is very simple – that it is absurd that you are required to pay to protect them against their own negligence or criminality of their employees or the people who are acting for them – in this case, Hermes.Your point here is that any requirement that a customer is required to pay extra to protect against the breach of contract is unfair within the meaning of the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act. Please have a read of the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act. In In particular, after you have read the sections within the act itself, get a schedule two and you will see examples of unfair terms. These are nonexhaustive which means that they are simply examples and lots of others can be added. An important point is that it forms a significant imbalance between your interests and their interests. They are using a standard form contract which is nonnegotiable. There is no competition because all the courier industry are doing this so there is no opportunity for you to go elsewhere and get a different type of deal. You will need to point out to the defendant – through the mediator – that included in the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act is a provision that gives the court the power – in fact a duty – on its own initiative to examine the fairness or otherwise of any term. Point out to the defendant that if they want to go to court then you are happy about it. That you will then raise the question of unfairness to the judge and also you will invite the judge to look at the entirety of the contract and to pronounce on the fairness or otherwise of the contractual terms. Tell the defendant that you expect that the judge will decide unequivocally that a term of the contract which requires the customer to pay extra to protect themselves against the service providers breach of contract is grossly unfair – and in fact it is ridiculous. Basically they are saying "pay us to deliver your goods – and pay us extra if you don't want us to lose them."   Explain to the defendant that you are fully aware that this is a culture within the courier industry which has developed over 30 or 40 years or more but it's not acceptable and that when you get a judgement in your favour which confirms that the term is unfair, (as will surely happen) that you will then make sure that copies of the judgement find their way all over the Internet including social media that is concerned specifically with complaints against the courier industry and then the game will be up for the loss of them. One the mediator to tell the defendant that once you get this judgement, not only will people be claiming for ongoing lost items, but they will also be claiming retrospectively for legitimate claims which have been rejected on the basis of this unfair term. Make it clear to the mediator – that they should tell the defendant that you're not dealing with very much money here – and you are prepared to risk it all in order to go to court and to demonstrate this principle. If the mediator says that you should compromise then you should tell the mediator that if the defendant pays up in full – including costs and interest – that they will then be spared the problem of going to court and getting a judgement against them which will result in the loss of millions of pounds in the future. Tell the mediator that this is the benefit to the defendant and you are not prepared to hand them any further benefit if it means sacrificing a single penny of your claim. Tell the defendant to take it or leave it – you are happy either way.   It is very important that the defendant understands that you don't care either way whether you settle now mediation or goes to court. The defendant as a huge amount to lose if it goes to court. You have very little to lose  
    • Firstly I am disabled and have brain fog so can forget anything.  Today I went online to check when the MOT is due as just had to renew my car insurance and know it comes quickly after that. I was shocked to see my car was flagged as NOT TAXED.  I have had disability tax for years so dont even have to pay. After ringing DVLA I eventually found out papers had been sent to my old house which I left 3 years ago. With the stress of moving etc I never changed the car address but did change the address on my licence as that is correct.   Now I am worried I may have picked up a speeding ticket sometime in the 3 years and also maybe recently on a day trip to London (2 miles too fast coming out a tunnel). The old house is 150 miles away so cant pop in and no idea who lives there now. Thats how I got caught out with tax as they sent the paperwork there to renew. The lady renewed the tax easily on the computer for me which I was so grateful for and backdated it to 1 Feb. Can anyone tell me how I can find out if there are any tickets out there in my name that I know anything about please? I have had a really awful week with so many problems and this is now really making me feel sick so dont want to worry for months to catch up with me.   Thanks  
    • Presumably you have received your own NIP/s172 request after the lease company identified you as the person the car is leased to?   First thing to say is that, regardless of any questions over the date of the first NIP, you must still reply to your own NIP/s172 within the time limit given otherwise you are committing an entirely separate and more serious offence than any speeding infringement.  If you were the driver you should nominate yourself.   You need to be careful arguing that the first NIP was not sent out in time.  Note that it is only the first NIP that is subject to the 14 day limit, and that NIP needs to go to the Registered Keeper.  There is no time limit on subsequent NIPs.   So are you 100% certain that your lease company is the registered keeper and do you know that for a fact?  Please note that the registered keeper of lease vehicles is often not the lease company, but a finance company.   If the police are saying that the first NIP was sent to the RK within the time limit, you can be 99.99999% certain that they will have evidence proving that fact.  Assuming it was sent out first-class, there is a legal presumption that it was delivered two working days after posting, unless the addressee can prove it was never received.  So if the police are saying the first NIP was sent out within 12 days, the RK would have to prove it was never received within 14 days to provide a defence.  As you might imagine, that is very difficult to prove otherwise everybody would claim it.  Unfortunately, "reminder" NIPs are usually not marked as such and may be indistinguishable from the original.   So you need to confirm (preferably by sight of a copy of the actual V5C document as staff of lease companies do not always know) who the Registered Keeper is, and when they recived the first NIP.  If it was received after 14 days can they prove that fact (eg by a date received stamp and an appropriate system for dealing with mail received) and can they prove that they didn't receive an earlier NIP?   Hope that makes sense!  If it doesn't another poster called Man in the Middle will clarify what I 've not explained well or got wrong.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
        • Thanks
      • 33 replies

Co-op Current account/Personal Loan merged upon default.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1850 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ive decided to nip this is the bud before it spirals out of control.

 

Lowells wrote to me...again today (the usual junk).

 

Ive been looking at similar threads but can't find anything.

 

When my account was defaulted back in 2009,

i had a loan with them,

they plonked the personal loan into the current account and piled it all together, totalling around £4300.

 

The account number Lowells have supplied corresponds to my old current account.

 

I'd like to know how exactly it added up to that much.

 

I have read that i can't send a CCA?

 

I sent off for a SAR a about 6 weeks ago,

i received a response about 2 weeks later that they couldn't find anything within 6 years.

 

They needed account numbers, previous addresses and needed me to sign the SAR,

i have done so and returned it to them today recorded delivery.

 

I'd like to get Lowells dealt with before they even pick up momentum.

 

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You can send a CCA to Lowell as there was a Loan involved.

Coop in theory shouldnt have merged the 2 accounts but they have.

 

Raise a complaint with Lowell if you are unhappy as I would imagine they now OWN the debt.

Check your credit file and see what appears on it.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
You can send a CCA to Lowell as there was a Loan involved.

Coop in theory shouldnt have merged the 2 accounts but they have.

 

Raise a complaint with Lowell if you are unhappy as I would imagine they now OWN the debt.

Check your credit file and see what appears on it.

Didn't think of that. It says current account on Noddle.

In theory, if it owes that much on a current account would that be overdrawn?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letters I received (2 of for 2 different debts with them, both identically worded).

 

We want to help you clear your account.

 

We know it can be hard managing your finances and we are willing to be flexible with you. However we do need to hear from you so that we can set up an arrangement and prevent any further action taking place.

 

This debt is not going to go away and ignoring the problem could make things worse for you. We have said in previous we require payment in full or if you cannot shots to pay it off in one go you can pay monthly.

 

Pay from £1 per day.

 

On so on ....

 

Bearing in mind the last 2 identical letters I received were from them 3 months ago saying they were escalating the accounts to their legal department (Hamptons).

 

 

I'm currently defending another account they via Bryan Carter, not sure if they know this? (Claim has been issued and I've refused their consent).

 

I've not bothered to contact any creditors in 3 years or more.

 

Do I issue them with CCA's just to shoot them down at range?

 

I racked up a lot of debt back in 2007 and lost track of anything. I want proof of what is what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point out the merging of the accounts to Ms Sara de Tute Director of legal and compliance at the Lowell Group.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Point out the merging of the accounts to Ms Sara de Tute Director of legal and compliance at the Lowell Group.

I don't have any proof of this. I just vaguely remember this happening I think.

The account numbers are the same as my old current account, I know this because I still have my very first debit card.

 

I did consider sending the "prove it letter".

Wanted to seek advice off you guys before proceeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes send the prove it letter, remember to refer to "the alleged debt" and do not acknowledge any liability, send to Ms de Tute.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes send the prove it letter, remember to refer to "the alleged debt" and do not acknowledge any liability, send to Ms de Tute.

I'll get that typed up later :-)

 

Regarding the other identical letter I received for an old credit card, would that call for a CCA or prove it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know what they are begging for, and it is a CC (pre2007) then you could send them a CCA request, using whatever reference/account number they have quoted.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's much easier to collect against a current account debt than a personal loan, so I suspect that is why they decided to do that. Maybe the personal loan is unenforceable ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The merging of two entirely separate accounts, which fall under totally different parts of the CCA, and will have different T&C's is a definite no non.

The FCA would take a very dim view of this, and if they were ever dumb enough to con a judge into attempting to enforce this, then he wouldn't be too pleased either when it is pointed out to him.

 

I would just be demanding the CCA under whatever ref/account number they have quoted, and see how far they get with that.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The prove it letter went out today altered to suit me. Went 2nd class recorded.

Let's see where it goes.

My second SAR is in progress so I'll see where that ends up.

I'll be requesting the CCA I think once she replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
The prove it letter went out today altered to suit me. Went 2nd class recorded.

Let's see where it goes.

My second SAR is in progress so I'll see where that ends up.

I'll be requesting the CCA I think once she replies.

I think it's got lost?

 

Item ABCD1234 was posted at "your local store" on 15/04/14 and is being progressed through our network for delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it's got lost?

 

Item ABCD1234 was posted at "your local store" on 15/04/14 and is being progressed through our network for delivery.

A thought did you use an address for Lowell with a PO Box number? There is always a problem with RD letters when these are used with Lowell also with 2nd Class RD delivery will be affected by the bank hols.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
A thought did you use an address for Lowell with a PO Box number? There is always a problem with RD letters when these are used with Lowell also with 2nd Class RD delivery will be affected by the bank hols.

 

In my experience, it's a euphemism for, "we think that we have lost it, but it could be that we delivered it, but couldn't be @rsed to get a signature, after all, you're only a customer, in truth we don't know, and don't care"

 

I have a pile of slips here, that have brought the same result

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites
A thought did you use an address for Lowell with a PO Box number? There is always a problem with RD letters when these are used with Lowell also with 2nd Class RD delivery will be affected by the bank hols.

I took the address from this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?400441-Unknown-default-from-Three

 

Address:

 

Private & Confidential

For The Personal Attention of

Ms Sarah de Tute

Director of Legal & Compliance

The Lowell Group

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

Suppose its had 6 working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another possible alternative:

 

What would happen if the loan was paid using the current account, leaving the current account overdrawn and the loan paid?

 

I'm going to give the letter til the end of the week, if no response of signs of delivery i'm just fire off a CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me with a HSBC account.

 

I did a SAR but it wasn't particularly illuminating.

 

I can only assume that they used their right to set off the balance of the loan to the current account (effectively they paid the loan off).

 

I have yet to see case law or a good explanation of why this is a no-no (although I have seen a lot of opinions from some very well experienced and qualified people). I have been trying to find this information in a format that could be used in a defence to a claim.

 

In my case, the sum demanded from the DCA contained the whole of the balance of an account covered by the relevant sections of the CCA , so I requested a copy of the agreement and the notice of assignment so that I could confirm the sum demanded and their legal right to do so. They failed on both counts.

 

I disputed the "account". Unsurprisingly, they have not been able to resolve my dispute.

 

Another possible alternative:

 

What would happen if the loan was paid using the current account, leaving the current account overdrawn and the loan paid?

 

I'm going to give the letter til the end of the week, if no response of signs of delivery i'm just fire off a CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have yet to see case law or a good explanation of why this is a no-no (although I have seen a lot of opinions from some very well experienced and qualified people). I have been trying to find this information in a format that could be used in a defence to a claim.

 

So have I !

 

Pretty much it can be argued that, a Loan has it's own T&C's with it's own interest rate, whereas an Overdraft, will have a completely different set of T&C's and interest rate.

 

So to amalgamate them both together without your knowledge would leave you at a serious disadvantage, and this would be deemed unfair practices using BCOBS, or if a credit card has been lumped in with an overdraft it would be questionable under COBS.

 

Plus it goes without saying that if they have fabricated a new acco8unt number, then any request for the CCA using that Acct number will be impossible to provide, not only that you will be able to show that you a) didn't sign the agreement, b) Knew nothing of it until they merged two separate account and gave it a new Acct number.

 

The reason that there is no case Law regarding this, is simply because they have been caught out prior to issuing legal proceedings and their legal teams have advised that they should indeed separate the accounts and chase individually, this is especially important when they have merged accounts to bring the total balance above £750. (The BR threshold)

 

That's my opinion on it, well how I see it, hopefully I'm not too far from the truth?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the account number in question relates to the old current account.

 

I'm awaiting the second shot at the SAR, and the first response from the SAR is that because so much time had passed, nothing was available.

 

Do i send a repeat "prove it" to Ms De Tute as i don't think the first will arrive, or just send a CCA request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I would wait, let sleeping dogs lie.

 

The longer they take to respond simply shows just how 'urgent' and 'important' these issues really are.

 

Letter tennis is tedious and expensive.

 

As for SAR's 40 Calender days in which to comply, or it gets escalated to the ICO for investigation.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
No I would wait, let sleeping dogs lie.

 

The longer they take to respond simply shows just how 'urgent' and 'important' these issues really are.

 

Letter tennis is tedious and expensive.

 

As for SAR's 40 Calender days in which to comply, or it gets escalated to the ICO for investigation.

*IF* the letter has actually been received. I want at least one letter on their desk.

At least if i send a CCA it has a countdown timer with it?

 

Opinion?

 

SAR #2 has been 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So did get a response from the "prove it letter" today, and i send the CCA letter yesterday :lol:

 

Pretty generic letter, not even from MS De Tute, pffffft.

 

Thank you for taking the time to contact us recently.

 

I confirm that your complaint has now been passed to the customer relations department who will carry out a thorough investigation. We will investigate this as quickly as possible as we can but we may need to contact you for further information or to provide you with an update. (Oh really, you bought the "debt", and you hassle me, and yet you need me to provide you with info. You guys need to get things in order before you start these things)

 

If we can contact you by telephone, we will be able to discuss your concerns directly with you and hopefully agree a resolution with you verbally (yeah and thats as good as the paper its written on). This is the quickest and easiest way for us to resolve this for you.

 

I would like to assure you that the account will be place on hold, and we will stop all collections activity whilst dealing with your complaint.

 

We enclose a copy of our internal complaints procedure for your information. Please take your time to read this, as it explains fully the steps we will follow in responding to your complaint.

 

In the meantime, if you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact my team by calling the free.....yes free! telephone number which brings you directly through to the customer relations department.

 

Questions:

 

Will receiving the CCA letter this week affect this response?

 

And i have another "proof letter" winging its way to just Lowells P.O Box this week, i assume that i'll just get a repeat response of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tim... who is the complaints advisor here who is dealing with it?

Id give them a little chance here, I actually think Lowell's CR is reasonable for what Lowell are.

 

But also i agree that it should be kept in writing :), But like i said they did wonders for me :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...