Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Plusnet and Moorcroft debt recovery


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am having problems with Plusnet.

 

I left them in the beginning of January 2014 after a few years of trouble free good service.

I only left due to a good deal with another provider.

 

I emailed and rang Plusnet a couple of times around the date I changed over to ensure I had paid all money owed.

I even had emails back confirming this.

 

a short while after I had a letter from a debt recovery firm called moorcroft demanding £347.75.

 

I told the person from Moorcroft the story and that I had proof that I owed no money

and she promised to get back to me after talking to Plusnet.

 

Of course that never happened.

 

I have been in contact with Plusnet and after a 25 minute+ wait I finally got to speak to a nice lady who promised to take care of this.

 

Now I am getting calls at various times of the day and night from Moorcroft

and the money owed has now changed to £16 (don't know why).

 

I can't seem to get any where with this case and

I'm worried that it might affect my credit rating in some way.

 

At one point in one of my first contacts with Plusnet I even paid a small amount of money just to get rid of this case

even though I know I did not owe anything at this point.

 

I might have gone back to Plusnet at some point in the future as I had a really good service while with them

but after this pain I will never use them again and further more will go out of my way to make sure Friends and family will never use them.

 

I find it absolutely mind boggling how a company of this size and fame can not sort out a simple thing

such as a customer leaving and also that I am expected to use my time and money hanging on the phone just to speak to someone,

just to ensure that I am not going to be tainted by a debt recovery firm.

 

Sorry for the rant in this (my first) post but the whole thing leaves me feeling angry and frustrated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well don't ever ring a DCA

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS

 

and have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

get your credit file

 

make SURE its not been thrashed!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to write to them marking it formall complaint

As speaking to them on the phone does not work as they do not care and will be seen as wasting there time they have far better things to do than speak to customers!

If there is just £16 owing pay it to plus net directly

Ignore morecrap

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

In my opinion, within the formal complaint you make to Plusnet, remind them that the DCA are acting on their instruction and as such they are fully responsible for the DCA's actions and the amount of calls from Moorcrap amounts to harassment.

 

Include copies of the emails you have and demand an explanation of how they can say one thing yet do something else.

 

If Moorcroft have not been told to stop calling, you feel a 'gesture of goodwill' is in order for the stress this has caused you.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...