Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
    • Still waiting for the terms and conditions in a readable state please. Try reading what you have posted up on a telephone screen if you don't believe me.
    • DCBL are such ignorant idiots. The PCN is non compliant as the land is covered by bye laws so they cannot pursue the keeper. By Law the PCN not being compliant means that only the driver can be pursued.  So what DCBL ae going on about by saying that they can pursue you under PoFA 2012 is utter hogwash.  
    • From the Mail's Jason Groves on Twitter. 'NEW: The cost of the govt’s Rwanda scheme has *doubled* before a single migrant has been sent there. Home Office admits tonight it has handed over another £100m this year, on top of the original £140m cost - with a further £50m to follow next year'
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
      • 2 replies
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening all.

 

This is a rant at those nice people at Brighthouse.

 

My partner and i decided we wanted a new laptop as the one we had was on its last legs.

 

We opted for the samsung 23 inch touchscreen version which is a monitor, keyboard, mouse and remote control.

 

No shops had this in stock so we went for a quality refurbished one which was only available from a store local to Leeds.

 

The lady in the shop said they would deliver it to the store and we could pick it up from there.

 

To speed the story up The pc was picked up from the store yesterday

it was in a brown box secured with tape.

 

So far so good.

 

Got the box home and was really looking forwards to setting up.

 

On opening the box i expected to see the original samsung box in there but nooo.

The monitor was wrapped up in bubble wrap and some styrene blocks holding it in place.

Hmmm not good so i carefully removed the monitor and put this on the side.

 

I went back to the box to get the other essentials out ie the mains, keyboard, mouse remote and instructions But they were not there.

 

All that was in the box was somebody elses returns note for a tv

ripped up

but all there Name full address customer number etc.

It was too late to ring the store.

 

This morning my partner rang up and explained all this got the normal i will ring you back which they did not.

 

Five phonecalls later and it is still not sorted. T

 

hey have to cantact a woman who was not in today (no surprise there)

The store where the pc came from originally does not have the parts they should have sent with it

and the icing on the cake happened earlier when i switched on the monitor to be greeted with a home screen

which had not been reset from the Store and was still asking for Brighthouse password...

 

.. The monitor is going back tomorrow as they have really peed us both off now.

 

Quality refurbished according to them means that the pc would have been reset to factory settings.

 

Have the broken any Laws, rules with regards to another customers personal information being in the box

and by also supplying an item which is clearly not as described.

 

...Many thanks for reading my rant.:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought with your previous issues with BH

 

you would have avoided them at all costs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing been with them for a few years with no problem after their last spat with the other half. They ring up as she is a valued customer offering discounts etc. Due to things going a bit belly up we have had to buy things from them.

Edited by monty76
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing to do with this is take it back and cancel everything

They will be charging you high amounts for a second hand product that when it fails to work they won't do anything about it

 

They are a awful company who like to bully people over the phone or on there own doorstep

 

As you have found out they do not ring you back they do not care

Quit wile you can

  • Confused 1

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk

Yes Look at when the last post post was written. 2010 and no problems since.

 

IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE ABRASIVE DONT BOTHER REPLYING.

 

It seems you are talking down to me so please don't do it.

 

I came on asking for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ann-Marie at BrightHouse

Good Morning Monty76,

 

I am sorry to hear that you are unhappy with your purchase.

 

Can you please send me your details to [email protected] quoting reference F0697141 or give me a call on 0800 526069 and I will be happy to get this resolved for you as quickly as possible.

 

Can you please keep the thread updated with any information you have.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ann-Marie

Web Relations Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...