Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just a quick question (CCJ)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3654 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

Looking at my credit report the other day on Experian,

 

a CCJ appeared on there (never been there before) from 2011,

for a smallish amount of £350,

but it's been registered against at an address I haven't lived at for about 7 years now,

and in a geographical area more than 50 miles away from me

(not that it has any relevance whatsoever!)...

 

I am actually looking to rent a house or a flat, and am wondering if it would show up on an estate agent's credit check,

seeing as the address is from 7 years ago

and won't be part of my application anyway,

and whether I'd end up losing a £250 referencing fee...

 

. What do those experienced people think??

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it would. If you have no knowledge of it, you would need to investigate ans see if you can get it set aside

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've actually just enquired about this with the court now,

 

and it seems that it's a debt I actually paid off in 2012,

so time to get on to the company themselves!

 

Do you think I could get the whole thing removed,

bearing in mind that the summons where clearly sent to an old address

and I knew nothing about it until the last few days.

 

The fact that the debt was paid off in 2012,

without the knowledge that there was even in a ccj in place

might add some weight to this claim.

 

The company are writing to the court to inform them that it was paid off.

 

To make the scenario more interesting,

 

I have a letter, dated after the ccj

threatening court action over the same debt!

Thoughts?

Edited by DeadlyDirk808
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the CCJ was paid a while after the court date,

then it wont be removed but you can get a certificate of satisfaction for it.

 

However, if you had no knowledge of any court action

and paid the DCA

and they didnt tell you,

then you could contest it as they arent allowed to do that.

 

basically you were paying as agreed,

but they still took court action,

on an old address anyway.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes, I paid it in 2012 with no knowledge that I was ever summoned to court, it seems the summons where sent to an old address, and the only time I knew about the ccj was when I checked my credit report earlier. It never appeared on my credit file until recently, and I didn't know what it was for until I spoke to the court today. So to summarise, 1) I never received the summons as they where sent to an old address, therefore had no knowledge of a judgement being made against me, 2) The debt was paid in 2012 (still had no knowledge of the CCJ at this point), 3) Became aware in the last few days of a CCJ against me, made in January 2011 , which with further investigation turns out to be the debt that I had paid off in 2012. I have spoken to the company who are writing to the court to confirm that it has been settled in full.

 

Have I got any hope of having it removed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

While you were paying this DCA, did they know your new address?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they did,

 

they wrote me a letter that at the time looked a standard "we're going to take you to court",

 

the first letter I actually received from them,

 

looking at it today

with the knowledge that they had already done the ccj

it looks like it was to threatening to summon me to court to go over why I hadn't paid the debt.

 

It's quite an ambiguous and cleverly worded letter

as it makes a fleeting mention of the judgement,

but without the knowledge that had already been done

 

it just seemed to be a threat more than anything.

 

Nevertheless, once I'd received this letter and establishing that I had an account with them I promptly paid it off.

 

Hope this makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did that, and they issued on the old address, then they are bang out of order. I'll see if i can get you some help.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw, which DCA was it?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the letter...

 

"NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROCEED WITH ACTION

 

Dear Mr x,

 

Safeloans will make an application on 06/07/2012 to the court for you to attend to be questioned as to your means to the pay the (CCJ) judgement debt.

 

You will be served with a copy of the court order to attend before the court.

 

Non-compliance of this order may result in serious repercussions.

 

Questioning will be by a court officer unless a judge agrees there are no compelling reasons for questioning to take place before a judge.

 

You will be asked to sign a statement of truth and you will be asked to produce all relevant documents

including but not limited to:

pay slips,

bank statements,

building society books,

share certificates,

rent book,

mortgage statement,

hire purchase

and similar agreements,

court orders,

any other outstanding bills,

electricity,

gas,

water

and council tax

bills for the past year.

 

This intended action can be avoided.

We would rather mediate the repayment of this loan with you and 3 repayment options for you to consider."

 

Now,

with what I learnt today,

this letter makes a lot of sense.

 

It's dated the 22/06/2012,

it makes clear reference to a CCJ being obtained,

and encourages mediation rather than court action.

 

Now, imagine you've never had a CCJ before in your life,

never been threatened with one, etc

then this lands first by e-mail,

then a couple of days later by post.

 

Naturally, the debt was paid rather quickly!!

 

The CCJ was done in January 2011,

and was issued at an address I moved out of in 2007,

the address I got the loan at doesn't even seem to come into play at all.

 

I don't want much,

I just want the CCJ stricken from the records!

 

It was quite a relief in the first instance when I discovered I paid it already!

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh so its a PDL. Typical tactics sadly. Which DCA was it that was chasing you?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh. Gotcha.

perhaps have a read of the PDL forums.

 

It seems safeloans like to do this kind of thing a lot.

 

I've asked the site team to see if they can step in and advise if possible,

but they might not get to the thread till tomorrow.

 

In any case, if they can help, theyll advise asap.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help buddy, really appreciate it!

 

I've spent the last year sorting out my finances and settling the few defaults

and outstandings I have had,

 

then this pops up!

 

Really demoralising to say the least!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DD,

 

You need to apply to the court to have the CCJ Set Aside on the grounds that the Claimant used an old address despite knowing your current address.

 

You should do this using Form N244 as soon as possible. A fee will be payable unless you qualify for fee remission.

 

Do you know what court dealt with the claim.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do,

it was Oxford County Court (combined court),

 

I've already spoken with them and safeloans and

 

the young lady at safeloans,

despite the situation was helpful and

 

said she would write to the court to confirm that the debt was satisfied in 2012.

 

The ccj was registered at an old address I moved out of in 2007,

the loan was taken out in 2010 at a different address,

and they finally wrote to me at my current address in summer 2012.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think, as such,

the service to an old address, wil play any part here.

 

the fact that the claimant is writing to the court

will be enough, on its own,

to get the CCJ annulled

and wiped as an 'admin' error.

 

you shouldn't have to pay for anything or fill any forms in.

 

let the claimant do the work/cost for you.

 

poss keep in-touch with the claimant,

findout when the letter was sent.

and then badger the court for confirmation its annulled.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, have you asked for a copy of Safe Loans letter to the court?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DD,

 

I would not rely on the Claimant doing anything here to help you have the CCJ "removed" from the register. If they confirm it was settled in 2012, that is what will be shown on the Register but the CCJ will still show for 6 years from 2011.

 

Getting the CCJ Set Aside will depend on whether you can satisfy the court that :-

 

1. You only just now learned about the CCJ because the PDL used an old address.

 

2. They used this despite having your (then) current address when the Claim was issued.

 

3. You kept the PDL aware of your address at all times.

 

I think you will struggle to get the CCJ Set Aside. You misunderstood the letter in June 2012 for one that just threatened court action, but it does refer to the CCJ and making arrangements to pay it off.

 

On balance, you may decide it is worth the risk of paying for a N244 Set-Aside Application, to try and clear your CRA files for the future.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dirk,

 

Just to add to my last post, Site Team Andyorch has said he also doubts a Set Aside Application can succeed here.

 

You settled the debt after the CCJ was made and, even though you misunderstood at the time, this leaves you with no defence.

 

Best you can do is to ensure the records are updated to show the CCJ is marked as settled in full with the correct date.

 

:sad:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps didn't see the dates

 

silly me

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not just you Dx.

 

I also failed to see some of the crucial info in various posts when I first read the thread. :oops:

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, looking through some of my posts it doesn't actually look clear (the chronology of events), I think your spot on Slick, I will struggle to get anything other than the ccj being marked as satisfied (the wheels are already in motion on this), purely because of that letter that I misunderstood at the time, although my defence at the time was that I was completely oblivious that I'd received a ccj on this matter, and with it being the only ccj I've ever received, I had no idea what the process is/was. The accompanying paperwork, i.e a fact sheet, lists questions on it like "What is a CCJ" and tells you what impact they can have, and that if you pay the ccj within 1 month it'll be removed, etc. This letter was sent in June 2012 whilst the CCJ is dated January 2011. (Debt was cleared in June 2012)

 

So anyway, with that issue to one side as I'm pretty sure it's here to stay on my file until January 2017 as satisfied at least, back to the original question, how badly will this impact when I'm trying to rent a house or a flat, and on my credit reference as a whole? I'm already guessing that High Street Lenders will turn their noses up at me, and with regards to car finance I'm looking at sub-prime lenders with an APR of 49.9%?

 

And, as it's registered against an address I moved out of in April 2007, will it even be seen by some/most lenders?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DD,

 

The reality is that a CCJ will almost certainly show up when a lettings agent does a search. It'll show against your name despite the old address being used. However, that will not necessarily preclude you from being able to rent a property.

 

My advice to you is to always disclose the CCJ and briefly explain that is is settled and was only made because the claimant used an old address.

 

If you are honest about the CCJ, that honesty should count in your favour, as opposed to them finding out about the CCJ through searches which would probably then count against you.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...