Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On Monday 31/03/14 I went into work like I would do any normal day, I put my stuff away went to clock in an I was called into office, My manager sat me down and said to me

" Abi, You don't seem right for the job (after 4months of being there) I think its best we end it here, You will be paid for the next week, but you don't have to work it, take it off"

 

So that was it, in work for 10am back out and on my way home by 10:25

 

I text my ex manager yesterday to see when I would get a formal letter from the company saying I no longer work for them, when the weeks wage would get paid to me and also for them to sort my commission that I am owed from January. He is yet to reply.

 

The reason I am posting this is because;

A- Are they just allowed to dismiss me like that, no letter, no warning .. just a good bye

B - How do I go about recovering my wage and commission when I do not have it in writing that I have been let go or that they are going to pay me

 

The company I worked for are notorious for not paying people what they are owed, but I refuse to let it go, being unemployed I need the £400 they owe me

so any help would be greatly appreciated

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :) I have sent another text today, still no reply :/

 

I did document everything, my regional manager who was giving me all the problems was dismissed a few weeks ago due to his attitude towards customers and employees

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't text! send letters, keep a copy and proof of postage!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letters end up in the bin or in the "filing" system which is a huge pile on the desk that never gets sorted through, they have letters from the court for payments that have been there for a few weeks and are being dealt with, Unfortunately working for them I have become used to their lack of taking responsibility they would much rather bury their heads in the sand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the letter is not really for your employer, it's for a copy for the court. You are busy building an audit trail for court at the moment.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wrote a post on here a while ago about being dismissed from work

 

**Dismissed on 31/3/14 I was told I needed to work a wee but to take this as a holiday and they would still pay me for it .. which I did as it was my manager who told me. I am yet to receive a letter from the company saying I have no job, I am also waiting for the weeks wage £260 and my commission from January £110**

 

I tried to contact my manager who never responded, so I wrote a letter to the head office making them aware that I still have not received the letter or the money they owe me. This letter was sent recorded and signed for (which was signed for on 14/4/14) They still have not replied.

 

Before I send them my 2nd letter I was wondering if there were anyways I could convince them to pay the owed money without going to court.

Are there any employment laws that say they need to pay this to me ? and send me my letter ??

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, there are laws about employment but you will struggle to enforce them without court by the sounds of it.

 

try moneyclaim online - £25 to lodge a claim from memory, may be wrong - court correspondence may scare them into action

 

have you checked your home insurance for legal cover?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not moneyclaim after just one letter. I know you want what is owed to you, but write again and tell them they have 7 days to make the payments owed or you will take further action. You can head your letter 'Letter Before Action' so they are in no doubt what your intentions are and end your letter that no further correspondence will be entered into.

 

 

If they don't respond to this one, then you can begin court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote a post on here a while ago about being dismissed from work

 

**Dismissed on 31/3/14 I was told I needed to work a wee but to take this as a holiday and they would still pay me for it .. which I did as it was my manager who told me. I am yet to receive a letter from the company saying I have no job, I am also waiting for the weeks wage £260 and my commission from January £110**

 

I tried to contact my manager who never responded, so I wrote a letter to the head office making them aware that I still have not received the letter or the money they owe me. This letter was sent recorded and signed for (which was signed for on 14/4/14) They still have not replied.

 

Before I send them my 2nd letter I was wondering if there were anyways I could convince them to pay the owed money without going to court.

Are there any employment laws that say they need to pay this to me ? and send me my letter ??

 

Thank you

 

Hello AL. I'ver merged the most recent thread that you started which I think is relevant to this employer. It will help guys like Emmzzi to advise you. Please think of the advisers and the advice that you would like to receive when you ask questions on CAG. If you add to an existing thread, it will help them to help you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...