Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have one more question. When the default judgement was entered against the defendant and the CCJ was issued I upgraded it to High court enforcement. Now the HCEOs did not seize any vehicle from them as the defendant applied for N244 application in their 2nd visit, the fees have piled up over 1500. They say if the judgement is set aside I will be liable for the fees but as far as I know only have to pay compliance fees of 75 quid if they were unsuccessful. They want to charge 150 quid for a witness statement and details of enforcement stage so far. Do you think I require witness statement yet? Is the bill from them enough to prove that I had indeed sent HCEO to seize their goods?
    • Parcelforce is simply a trading name of the post office. If you hadn't accepted the mediation then you could have had the matter properly tested in court against the retailer – although it is highly likely that the retailer would have put their hands up. They are responsible for the faulty item and for all delivery charges and liabilities related to its return to them and its subsequent safe return to you. Can you please post up the document which says that if you didn't accept mediation it would go against you in court. If you really are worried about the confidentiality of your settlement agreement then please email a copy of it to me at our admin email address.
    • Randle Brooks,He Is well registered loan lender that is permitted to give out Guarantee loan to individuals and Business firm and also to anybody that needs financial help for more contact:Email: randlebrooks2000@gmail.com  WhatsApp Only:  +12676685789
    • Dear BankFodder, thank you.  I have to say that I did also fall into the category of "if we didn't accept mediation it would go against us in court" and to be honest I was happy with what we were awarded despite the fact that at the moment there is a serious doubt as to whether we will actually receive the awarded sum as we are unable to return the faulty item??   Please accept my ignorance but I am confused as to why this is anything to do with the Post Office as the claim is again Parcel Force, based on their T&C's when the contract was taken out with them.   With relation to the settlement agreement it clearly states on there that " the parties will keep the information contained in this agreement confidential and not use it for any other purposes"??   Thank you      
    • I have tidied and formatted the layout ...and a few typos.The content is really your own words and evidence in support of your initial defence and therefore is not nessessary to add any further.   regards   Andy
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
       
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
john

judges requests

Recommended Posts

Received a letter from Cobbetts today asking for me to send notice of discontinuance forms to court as they sent a cheque for full and final settlement on 13th August. Great, but only problem is I haven’t got any letter or cheque.

 

Also according to todays letter they have enclosed a copy of said letter from 13th August, but that isn’t there either!!!

 

Have spoken to them today and they don’t seem too concerned about the missing cheque, and the missing copy of the letter is a clerical error. I broached the subject of the extra interest accrued, and was told to email with the current figure. Have done this today so eagerly await the outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this may come as a little overdue but ... the practice direction to Part 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules says nothing about a request for further information not applying to small claims cases. In fact, if allocation questionnaires have not been filed prior to the request for further information pursuant to CPR Part 18 then the claim is not allocated to any track and both parties are still very much on risk as to costs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest willowb

:eek: this can't be true, wouldn't Cobbetts be milking this fact? as it stands they've never used that argument in any of the letters I've received from them!

 

Wxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I stated to Cobbetts all along that I had no problem providing the information at the courts request, and indeed submitted the info at the judges request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest willowb

Hi John,

But isn't that the whole argument here......'at the Judge's request' ? I too have expressed the same and have provided as much relevant information to them without going into legal depths by answering every question in their request. Although we should be ready for it, I think the Judge would see right through this.......not that it'll ever go before a Judge ;>)

 

Wxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

been in touch with cobbetts today, they said they are going to get a cheque issued for full amount claimed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Following thread


Please Click The Scales if I have been of help to you.

 

 

Kensington Mortgages withdrawn. no costs

NatWest Settled in full

Abbey Court Settled in Full

Capital 1 settled in full

Halifax settled in full :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic was closed on 2019-03-08.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...