Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
Hi Stu Thank you so much for coming back to me We've owned the property for nearly 17 years as a leaseholder and TP are the management company and the freeholders are Southern Land Securities. We are in the process of selling our property and the first obstacle encountered was the Freeholder and TP couldn't provide proof of the loft conversion application that it was approved and said it was our responsibility to ensure this despite purchasing the property in situ, I then had to call the Local Authority to get all the relevant paper work to prove permission was sought and application approved. Which solved that matter. 2nd obstacle, the current plan does not demise the roof crawl spaces and the red lines do not go into eaves on the plan, they are saying from their standpoint the deed of variation is required, which they are charging nearly £8000. We don't think its necessary but the buyer is requesting it, despite having the certificate for the loft conversation from Local Authority and Documents from Land Registry to say all is above board and no issues. if we can't provide the Deed of Variation to include the eaves and crawl spaces as this is why its needed we can lose the sale because we can't afford the fee they have quoted which is astronomical My thinking is we have been living in the property without any prior need for the Deed of Variation and using those spaces without any issue its part of the property. My question is, why are TP and Freeholder are saying it is required Hope am making sense, this is my first time going through this. I can upload all the documents requested on Monday. How do you think we should respond and do you think we should requested SAR Also, Southern Land Security brought our property via an auction in 1996 and we moved in 2007 (some background) Thank you so much for your help and look forward to hearing back YasminD -
Your/his assertion is about on a par with the 'cant prove it wasn't' assertions that the pyramids were built by Aliens (let alone Gu'ald) despite pictures/pictograms of labourers building them -
Some credible support other than an opinion please @theedlrouge? Dalgliesh is unquestionably a UKIP fringe loon IMCCO Lets see some quality studies and evidence on pubmed, nature or newscientist - NOT some loon opinion on the dorris and boris show mail Covid origin: Why the Wuhan lab-leak theory is so disputed WWW.BBC.COM The claim Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory dates from early in the pandemic. Here's what we know. Absolutely EVERYTHING I have seen (which is a lot) from credible sources, including some far more credible analyses on whether the virus was mutated in a lab, are quite clear on concluding Covid-19 was a natural mutation Claims of lab creation have ALL been fringe opinion pieces without support or credibility
-
By honeybee13 · Posted
It will be interesting to see how many of his medical colleagues agree. It's also interesting how an oncologist like Prof Dalgleish is commenting on virology and epidemiology. -
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
-
-
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
It always leads to tears!
used car.mp4
-
-
Pizza delivery insurance
BankFodder posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Pizza delivery insurance.mp4
Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
Default Notice Issues Over Six Years Ago and Debts Still Outstanding
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 3533 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London NW11 7PE
Recommended Posts