Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard Visa SAR / PPI help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi hope someone can help.

 

I had a CPP for the above in which I have been successful in reclaiming.

 

The only thing is I have today received a statement and Barclaycard have deducted protection amount owed from balance,

Tax amount and also the simple interest amount ?

 

The card was suspended a couple of years ago (due to another barclaycard account that I had problems with)

and I always make the regular minimum monthly payments that are due on this account.

 

I have had no contact from them regarding what they have done

or any further contact from Card Protection Plan Limited.

 

Is this correct what they have done as

 

I thought that any interest less tax should have been returned to me and not applied to the account ?

 

Its not a large amount but its the principle of the matter that concerns me.

 

Apologies if I have posted under wrong section.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you saying CPP have settled your claim?

 

didn't think they were doing anything till atleast august 2014

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you saying CPP have settled your claim?

 

didn't think they were doing anything till atleast august 2014

 

That's what I thought but I have received a statement deducting mentioned amounts ? If that's the case should they have not applied the simple interest amount ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the refund of CPP from CPP goes direct to you.

 

sure this is not Barclays that have refunded you

was the CPP from before 2005

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the refund of CPP from CPP goes direct to you.

 

sure this is not Barclays that have refunded you

was the CPP from before 2005

 

Again thats the mystery no correspondence regarding it just a Barclaycard statement received today showing amounts ? I had previously completed CPP details regarding a Morgan Stanley Credit Card pre 2005 but had not heard anything more since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

were you sent a recent cpp reclaim form under the agreed scheme and filled in and returned it?(all sales/renewals from jan 2005)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes barclaycard have paid you (deducted) on behalf of CPP as per the scheme arrangement. You now need to reclaim all amounts paid prior to jan 2005 with associated interest from barclaycard

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes barclaycard have paid you (deducted) on behalf of CPP as per the scheme arrangement. You now need to reclaim all amounts paid prior to jan 2005 with associated interest from barclaycard

 

OK thanks. Do I just sent Barclaycard a letter to that effect ? Is there a template letter do you know ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the reasons for mis-selling that you put on your reclaim form, and enclose a spreadsheet using the in t rate they charged on your card as per ppi reclaim

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the reasons for mis-selling that you put on your reclaim form, and enclose a spreadsheet using the in t rate they charged on your card as per ppi reclaim

 

Thanks again. Sorry for further questions but how is the interest calculated / applied ? Per year since I've been paying it ?

 

I paid a yearly amount of £20 from 1999 to 2005 when barclays took on account and it was cancelled.

 

Figures on statement are CCP £76.00 CR plus £70.64 CR for Simple interest and £14.13 DR in respect of Tax.

 

APR is 19.16%

Link to post
Share on other sites

the scheme only refunds from jan 2005 so have you paid £76 in premiums from jan 2005, otherwise it doesnt make sense, because at £20 per year you would have paid £120 in premiums pre 2005

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the scheme only refunds from jan 2005 so have you paid £76 in premiums from jan 2005, otherwise it doesnt make sense, because at £20 per year you would have paid £120 in premiums pre 2005

 

Sorry for confusion but that's why I am asking. I will contact Barclaycard for an explanation anyway but the payments were pre 2005 hence mentioned in CPP letter a while back and that Barclaycard would be contacting me.

 

The policy was cancelled by Barclaycard in 2005 when I had difficulties with my other card and account was suspended. I still make minimum payments and it seems that they have applied refund amounts to my balance outstanding.

 

They have applied simple interest to amount but is this correct ? Should the APR also been applied ? Is there a spreadsheet template that I can use that will calculate correct amounts owing ?

 

And finally as the card account is suspended, should the interest amounts less tax be returned by cheque to me and not to account ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have just been advised that Barclaycard are to offset PPI refund amount from my balance on a suspended account.

 

Can someone kindly advise if they should have only applied PPI amount and returned the Simple Interest part to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for confusion but that's why I am asking. I will contact Barclaycard for an explanation anyway but the payments were pre 2005 hence mentioned in CPP letter a while back and that Barclaycard would be contacting me.

 

The policy was cancelled by Barclaycard in 2005 when I had difficulties with my other card and account was suspended. I still make minimum payments and it seems that they have applied refund amounts to my balance outstanding.

 

They have applied simple interest to amount but is this correct ? Should the APR also been applied ? Is there a spreadsheet template that I can use that will calculate correct amounts owing ?

 

And finally as the card account is suspended, should the interest amounts less tax be returned by cheque to me and not to account ?

 

Just to up-date situation, I have today received refund cheque from CPP for post 2005 period.

 

I contacted Barclaycard regarding pre 2005 period, as previously explained regarding additional Credit Card statement received deducting CPP amounts from balance including simple interest.

 

My question again is should the Simple interest amount have been refunded to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes for the si,in addition you should be seeking associated interest at the rate you were charged to be refunded

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes for the si,in addition you should be seeking associated interest at the rate you were charged to be refunded

 

Thanks for the response oldrouge.

 

Sorry for silly question but how do I calculate associated interest amount ? Statement reads as follows :-

 

Cr Simple Int £70.64

Cr Card Protection £76.00

Dr Tax £14.13

Int on cash Balance 2.00% £5.55

Int on standard Balance 1.597% £10.31

 

New Balance £1,004.28

Link to post
Share on other sites

use this spreadsheet FosCISheet v101.xls

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Apologies if I have posted under wrong thread but wanted to advise the following and perhaps someone can enlighten me before I respond to Barclaycard.

 

I was successful in reclaiming CPP (CPI) for the above mentioned

only due to the fact that I noticed a refund on my latest statement

but no explaination from Barclaycard ?

 

I decided to chase and request details and breakdown of refund amount.

 

Today I finally received a letter from Barclaycard apologising for not explaining calculation of refund

and prior letters being sent to me (in which have now been enclosed dated February 2014)

and confirmation that refund has been made.

 

What annoys me is that

they are saying that because I hadn't responded

(but how could I when letters had not been sent, requesting way of refund)

they deducted from account ????

 

Mind you they have given me a goodwill gesture of £50 for the inconvenience

but again they will deduct from my account.

 

Am I still within my rights to request that they return by way of payment to my bank ?

 

Its not a large sum but still around £185 but would rather have the cash than reduction of card balance.

 

Also they have advised that Barclaycard apply 8% simple interest

as it is not a company policy to award compound interest for such complaints.

 

Is this correct does anyone kindly know ?

 

Should I request details where in their policies does it state this ?

 

I'm not looking a gift horse but the difference in refund is in the region of £600

 

I don't really want to go to FOS at moment so any advice would be appreciated before I respond or accept their offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any arrears on the account ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any arrears on the account ?

 

Thanks Citizen - No not on this Morgan Stanley / Barclaycard account but it has been suspended due to another Barclaycard account that I have an Payment Plan arrangement with.

 

And can you confirm if its simple interest and not compound ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...