Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
    • Have to attend the hearing and present evidence of his financial position (income & expenditure) and  statements ,and agree an acceptable payment plan with the judges guidance.  It will be a form of redetermination hearing as already stated.The court will not agree to bailiffs if the financials do not reflect it or assetts are minimal. They just want to determine his true affordable disposable monthly figure....which will not be £10.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can UKCP get bailiffs to Seizing Mobility Car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3658 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can |I get some advice on this subject. I have a mobility car on lease from Ford. I have an outstanding parking fine that I am contesting. Can the bailiffs clamp my car and tow it away?

 

Only if they are extremely greedy and stupid, it is unlawful to seize remove and sell a car subject to a lease, Motability doubly so as there will be a Zero VED Disabled Taxation disc in the windscreen, if the bailiff ignores that and clamps anyway, he is in the carp big time. A Motabilty lease car will NEVER belong to the keeper so any bailiff claim that they can seize sell and pay of the finance are feldercarb.

 

Have you informed the council and bailiffs of the cars status, and could you give us a few more details so more targeted advice can be given? Which bailiffs are these?

 

If they were to take the vehicle as you are not the owner Motability could report it as stolen, as indeed it would have been

 

Remember RULE 1: BAILIFFS LIE Rule 2: Refer to Rule 1

Edited by brassnecked
sting in tail

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I am just covering my back before the poo hits the fan. I parked on UKCP private car park for 5 mins> I did display the badge but still got fined £60, which I have no intention of paying as the ticket cost £1. Its mt fault I know but i,m not getting fleeced by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not an outstanding fine on a private car park. it is a speculative invoice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not an outstanding fine on a private car park. it is a speculative invoice.

Yes indeed no fine no bailiff they need to prove a consequential loss above a mere trifle to ground a claim in the County Court, as this is under the Law of Contract..

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i ask what communication have you recieved so far? Any chance you can give us a bit of detailed history so we know how far along the chain you are and what your next step should be? bailiffs will only ever be used as a last resort, adn thats after you have been through court, lost, refused to pay any judgement. This can take months.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to send bailiffs they would need a CCJ, and if they went to court you could contest it especially if their claim is out of all proportion to the loss. Was there signage placed in a prominent position telling about the charges, and whether disabled persons and blue badge holders had to pay?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i ask why you are talking about bailiffs? Has the PPC suggested the use of them?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the introduction of the Protection of Freedoms Act in relation to private parking tickets it has taken a huge amount of effort by the volunteers from Consumer Action Group, Monkey Saving Expert and Pepipoo to make the public aware that under the new regulations introduced 2 years ago that they must NOT ignore these notices as they are NOT 'speculative invoices' at all.

 

The change in rules was introduced in order to rid the industry from 'cowboy clamper's'. Unfortunately, the Minister pushing these regulations through Parliament was relentless in her objective to introduce 'Keeper Liability'. As predicated, the 'cowboy clamping firms' quickly turned into 'cowboy ticketers' and now...'cowboy litigators'. The number of summonses issued by the likes of Parking Eye, Proserve, runs into thousands. If you have received a ticket from one of these operators which you consider is unfair, then you must ensure that you make use of the free 'appeal' service; PoPLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the introduction of the Protection of Freedoms Act in relation to private parking tickets it has taken a huge amount of effort by the volunteers from Consumer Action Group, Monkey Saving Expert and Pepipoo to make the public aware that under the new regulations introduced 2 years ago that they must NOT ignore these notices as they are NOT 'speculative invoices' at all.

 

 

 

Have we saved many Primates?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we saved many Primates?

 

PPC sends notice to owner who replies in a Clouseu accent over the phone, " I had borrowed the car to a blaind beggaar and his muinkiy, so I don't kneu whether it was the muinkey or the blaind beggare who was brekking the lweuw" And added that as the driver was the beggae who was blind being guided by the monkey, they missed the postage stamp signage.

 

No seriously, these PPCs are now beyond a joke. Nontheless, even with a CCJ the bailiff can't have the Motability car away, neither can a HCEO if the ppc gets a writ of fi-fa by inflating the debt to £600.01

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How were you given the demand? Ticket on windscreen I presume. If so tell us the date of the ticketing and what further correspondence you have received and on what date was that sent/ received. The timings are most important.

How are you contesting it? When did you send appeal to parking co?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

As we have these new laws come in I have a question. What type of debt are these people allowed to force entry? Is it only for criminal fines? Can they force entry for civil matters i.e parking tickets?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. You say rather. Under law CAN they enter a house by force?

 

Not for civil PCN or Council Tax, without permission from the court

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. You say rather. Under law CAN they enter a house by force?

 

Only if authorised by a court. That is for their protection as well as the debtor's. However, the more disingenuous elements within the civil enforcement industry tend to "conveniently" forget this until it backfires in their faces or they land very heavily on their backsides on the pavement outside a debtor's home because the debtor has used lawful force to stop them continuing to break the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...