Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Littlewoods / Shop Direct PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a Littlewoods catalogue account in which was paid up and closed in June 2009.

 

I sent the normal Credit Agreement request etc with enclosed statutory payment of £1.

 

Today I have received a reply from Shop Direct / Littlewoods with returned cheque and stating as the account is closed, we are not obliged to send you a copy of the executed agreement or confirm if any payment protection details.

 

However they do state that under Data Protection Act 1998, I am entitled to request copies of all personal data etc if I provide a statutory payment of £10.

 

Has anyone experienced the same ? Are they acting lawfully by not addressing my original request ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA request is normally when you are disputing the account with a DCA, asking them to prove that they have any right to be demanding money from you.

 

If you wish to reclaim PPI then you should do a SAR to the OC and they'll then send all the account info they have on file so you can read through and see if PPI even applied.

 

Shop Direct converted some delinquent accounts to loans, where PPI was added. Until you do a SAR you'll not really know, unless you still have the original documents that is.

  • Confused 1

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA request is normally when you are disputing the account with a DCA, asking them to prove that they have any right to be demanding money from you.

 

If you wish to reclaim PPI then you should do a SAR to the OC and they'll then send all the account info they have on file so you can read through and see if PPI even applied.

 

Shop Direct converted some delinquent accounts to loans, where PPI was added. Until you do a SAR you'll not really know, unless you still have the original documents that is.

 

OK many thanks and presume any signed agreements will be supplied with SAR request ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be whatever they have on file. Some of these companies are claiming that they do not hold documents over a certain time limit, so you'll have to pay up front and see what comes back,. If they can't send anything then I'd expect a refund, but they don't have to.

 

More is explained if you click on the highlighted SAR link ;-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be whatever they have on file. Some of these companies are claiming that they do not hold documents over a certain time limit, so you'll have to pay up front and see what comes back,. If they can't send anything then I'd expect a refund, but they don't have to.

 

More is explained if you click on the highlighted SAR link ;-)

 

Yes as I have found out previously with others but didn't get a refund . Oh well in for a penny in for a pound and many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...