Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm well impressed with NZ Got a real person in charge, who deals with real world issues in a real world way. Even better than Sturgeon.   Way past time we threw the political elite like Johnson, Farage, Corbyn, Rees-Mogg and Gove out into the street and had them supervised while they swept it and did an actual service to the country.
    • Hello, thank you, I had it marked as due this Friday on the calendar.  My only defence is that I have a really acute kidney infection and infected cellulitis in my leg, last week has just been about survival although I doubt it will matter.  Can I file something late do you know?  Crikey life’s a bit of a bucket of muck at the minute 
    • ROFL Deals with the EU is going to be a prime mover for years to come, whatever could make you think otherwise - it is, soon to be was, was our biggest, most profitable, and soon to be seen as most necessary market for all but the Singapore-on-Thames profiteers.   Thats what you get when you listen to International profiteers lies masquerading as nationalist jingles.
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
    • Just upload one of the identical letters sent, hopefully it’s done it correctly.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2412 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have been made redundant through the process and my job have been given to someone else.

They wanted me to apply for another person job as they were not happy with his performance. The problem was pay which was 20% lower than has I had.

Therefore, I refused to go for that job. As they had given my existing job to another person who is also 15% lower than me.

 

My question is can I take them to tribunal on grounds that I have been made redundant due to lower cost of new employees and they tried to exploit me by asking me to apply for the job which is 20% lower.?

 

Can I also take them on discrimination grounds as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get redundancy pay?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to be clear in this, they asked you to do another job role but that would mean a pay cut, you declined. They then went on to recruit another individual and gave your current job role to him and made you redundant saying there was no other job role for you in the company on the same terms and conditions

 

is that correct

Link to post
Share on other sites
I need to be clear in this, they asked you to do another job role but that would mean a pay cut, you declined. They then went on to recruit another individual and gave your current job role to him and made you redundant saying there was no other job role for you in the company on the same terms and conditions

 

is that correct

 

Basically, my region merged with another region so they gave all my work to another employee who is 15% lower pay. Then they asked me if I want I can apply for another region but pay will be less.

 

They wanted me to go for another region so that they can get rid of the person in that region as he was giving them trouble and at the same time they will cut my pay 20%.

 

They were so sure that I will go for 20% lower paid job that when I declined they were shocked and they made me work till the notice period ended so that if I changed my mind they can place me into the job,, whereas in other redundancies in other departments the paid off notice pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what selection process was used to select people for redundancy?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We were given consultation pack 1st draft and then revised 2nd draft and at risk letters. And after the interviews there was consultation with me as I was the only one in my department who was made redundant. In the consultation they did not offer me any substitute but was told that I wasn't successful at interview and I must sign "Voluntary Redundancy Form" to be eligible for redundancy pay.

 

I didn't sign the paper as I didn't volunteer for redundancy but I was told they only give this form and I wouldn't get any redundancy if I don't sign it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are making you compulsory redundant you should still get money (if you have worked thee long enough), but often the terms are worse.

 

I'm struggling to see that you have a case here, due process seems to have been followed. You may no like it, but that isn't the same as it being unlawful.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

but your job no longer exists?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm the OP seems to be implying- not completely clearly- that his job does still exist but is being carried out by someone else on 15% less pay.

 

I think- what he is thinking of is, the situation where one has an ET case when your job is advertised, after it has been made redundant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many people in your department do the same job as you ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At one place I worked at one of the top managers willingly left, quietly taking a huge redundancy package with him. He was replaced by someone with the same job title and the same duties. Of course there was never going to be a challenge from Mr. Moneybags who had left, but it shows perhaps that an organisation doesn't have to tweak a role too much to successfully claim that it is not the same job at all.

 

They have given you redundancy, and offered you alternative employment as well, which you turned down - I don't think you would be getting much from a Tribunal decision if it did go in your favour.

 

As for discrimination, how so?

 

I think you may just need to put it behind you and move on I'm afraid. Sorry.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes correct, they gave the job to the staff on 15% lower pay.

There are 10 managers doing the same job.

I did not ask for any redundancy and they forced me to accept.

How is that possible that employer can just run the process and give my job to someone else for no reason.

There was no vacant job, they asked me if I want they can put me against another manager and we can compete which I refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wrote "was told that I wasn't successful at interview".

 

Which reads to me like there was a selection process for the jobs - you just weren't successful.

 

So that is not just giving your job away.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, this is what the problem is that they had their mind made up already, otherwise how is that possible that I am doing the job since years and no negative points against me other than I was criticizing their centralization policies.

 

What I am trying to say is my redundancy is not due to I wasn't successful at interview as I had great interview, but more to do with criticizing their policies which has lead the organization to spend more rather than savings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the selection process was conducted by my two senior managers and not even HR person was involved where as with other job interviews in other departments there was HR person involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no obligation to have HR involved.

 

did you appeal at the time?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't appeal as I was told at consultation that there is no job for me and I was given redundancy form to sign within two weeks.

 

In the consultation pack it was written that if anyone made redundant will be offered substitute but I wasn't. What I was told is that if I want I can apply for another person's job and if successful will have to work with 20% lower pay as I explained above. But it wasn't a substitute job offer as they were saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still can't see any grounds whatsoever for a claim. You need to decide if you are going for a lower paid job or leaving. Harsh, but it's the only options I see.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

May be I wasn't clear. How could I go for the lower paid job when the job was not vacant. They were just trying to cover their back and even if the job was there then it was based in Lincoln and I am in London.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, to sum up:

 

  • Your job was 'given' to someone else at a 15% lower rate;
  • You were told to apply for a job that wasn't vacant;
  • But was 145 miles away even so.

Really?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to give us absolutely clear details of how the process was conducted which identified your role as being redundant.

 

 

1. Was a selection process used which scored you and your colleagues?

2. Was your score in this process the lowest?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...