Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
By honeybee13 · Posted
Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB -
By anotheruser0000 · Posted
Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office. -
deed? you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court. Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else exact names of orders in message above. The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case. However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out two days ago. This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case. it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. -
By Deathbybanking · Posted
Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023 -
Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement YES ADDISONS DISEASE
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 3702 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
Recommended Posts