Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lancaster Insurance want a fee to cancel after selling


Blondmusic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is on behalf of a friend of mine.

 

He owned a Classic Morris car which he insured with Lancaster Insurance at the price of £68 for a full years cover which he paid in full. Now he has sold the car and is getting something more modern. Lancaster Insurance told him that if he takes a new policy for his new car then they would waive the £50 cancellation fee but if he takes cover elsewhere they want £50.

 

He was hoping just to transfer the policy over to another car but Lancaster Insurance quoted him almost £500 but he managed to get a much cheaper quote, almost half price, elsewhere on comparison sites.

 

Now I feel a cancellation fee of £50 is excessive given the price of the policy for a year at £68. They even refuse to refund him for the 4 months which was left to run stating that once the policy has run for 8 months they don't refund anything. They even told him that if he had not sold the car and let the policy run he would only be able to transfer the NCD to another classic car.

 

Can anyone help with this?

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there's very much he can do about it then. I'm afraid contractual cancellation and admin fees are normal in insurance these days, and with such a low premium, they might argue that admin fees are justified by the extra work incurred.

 

Insurance fees unfortunately haven't yet come under the kind of scrutiny that bank charges did, and I'm not aware of any legal grounds for arguing that the fee is unreasonable. In any case, they'd probably argue that classic car insurance is a specialist product anyway, by way of justification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there's very much he can do about it then. I'm afraid contractual cancellation and admin fees are normal in insurance these days, and with such a low premium, they might argue that admin fees are justified by the extra work incurred.

 

Insurance fees unfortunately haven't yet come under the kind of scrutiny that bank charges did, and I'm not aware of any legal grounds for arguing that the fee is unreasonable. In any case, they'd probably argue that classic car insurance is a specialist product anyway, by way of justification.

 

The smart move here is to register a written complaint stating that the £50 is excessive given the annual premium of £68 and therefore it is the intention to elevate the complaint to the FOS. Ask for Lancaster to provide their final response that they insist on the £50 cancellation fee and are happy for the complaint to be passed to the FOS.

 

Then see how Lancaster respond. I think the FOS may not see the £50 cancellation fee as excessive, as it relates to the admin costs incurred by Lancaster and is not related to the policy premium. However, Lancaster may decide that they cannot be bothered in dealing with such a complaint, even if it is without merit and will therefore write off the cancellation charge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell them that you have no insurable interest, the policy is no longer valid as you are unable to make a claim. How can they charge you for something you can never claim from?

 

If that fails then as Unclebulgaria67 said, go down the FoS route.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudiceicon. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional.

All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here,my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

" No one can make you feel inferior without your consent " - Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell them that you have no insurable interest, the policy is no longer valid as you are unable to make a claim. How can they charge you for something you can never claim from?

 

If that fails then as Unclebulgaria67 said, go down the FoS route.

 

They bought a 12 month policy, under which it states that if you cancel mid term a £50 cancellation admin fee will be charged. Also under the terms of the policy, there will be a condition to inform the Insurers of any significant changes e.g selling the vehicle.

 

People have to be very careful not advising their Insurers when they sell a vehicle. There have been cases where the new owner has not taken out any insurance and under the Road Traffic Act (RTA) there has been a claim by a third party against the only existing insurance for the vehicle. Apparently under the RTA, if there is any insurance in existance, the Insurers have to pick up the risk, rather than the MIB getting involved. The Insurers then come after their policyholder for them breaching the terms of the contract, by not informing them that the vehicle had been sold. There was a case in the last year or so, when Insurers took their policyholder to court for £30k. I don't know what the outcome was, as that has not been reported. It may still be ongoing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They bought a 12 month policy, under which it states that if you cancel mid term a £50 cancellation admin fee will be charged. Also under the terms of the policy, there will be a condition to inform the Insurers of any significant changes e.g selling the vehicle.

 

People have to be very careful not advising their Insurers when they sell a vehicle. There have been cases where the new owner has not taken out any insurance and under the Road Traffic Act (RTA) there has been a claim by a third party against the only existing insurance for the vehicle. Apparently under the RTA, if there is any insurance in existance, the Insurers have to pick up the risk, rather than the MIB getting involved. The Insurers then come after their policyholder for them breaching the terms of the contract, by not informing them that the vehicle had been sold. There was a case in the last year or so, when Insurers took their policyholder to court for £30k. I don't know what the outcome was, as that has not been reported. It may still be ongoing.

 

Indeed there was a case last year that received media attention, a motorcyclist did not cancel his insurance when e cancelled as he wanted to avoid the fee, the new owner had an accident and had not insured the bike. The sellers Insurers had to pay out and they then started to pursue him for upwards of £30k.

 

The Insurers were duty bound by the RTA due to there being a current Certificate, they then recover their outlay from their (ex) client under the clause virtually all Insurers include on motor policies which in effect states "We will seek to recover any monies we are duty bound to pay due to statute that we would otherwise not have had to pay.

 

It's relatively rare but does happen, I've seen it with my own clients a few times

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...