Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But the booking platform warns it is still too early to predict how many travellers will return in 2021. View the full article
    • I purchased a bathroom tap for £125 from online company, 'QS SUPPLIES', in May 2020. It was duly fitted and all was fine until December 2020 when the top lever came away from the base of the tap rendering it useless. I immediately contacted QS SUPPLIES using their online complaints procedure and submitted a photo, as required. When after a few days I had heard nothing from them I called their CUSTOMER SERVICES team and was told that they were waiting for a response from the manufacturer, a company called 'SANEUX', I pointed out that my contract was not with the manufacturer and that I expected QS SUPPLIES to deal with my complaint. I was then advised to email them again, which I did...twice.... when they finally responded to my second email they asked me to send another photo of the faulty tap. This time, their response was that their,  TECHNICAL TEAM had looked at the photo and decided that the tap, "APPEARED TO BE FORCED", and therefore they would be, "UNABLE TO OFFER A REFUND ON THIS OCCASION".  So after  7 months of use and at a cost of £125, this company, on the strength of one slightly grainy photo have decided I am entitled to nothing. I have applied to be reimbursed by my credit card company under Section 75 but I am still determined to attempt to get QS SUPPLIES to take responsibility and would really appreciate any advice about the best way to go about this.  
    • Good news for me is that the Bounce Back Loan came through so I can pay the full car payment!  Thanks for reply.
    • Welcome. please follow the advice given above as to reading around the various stories and then monitor this thread for a full reply tomorrow  
    • Hi Everyone,  I am the seller in this case and want to thank the buyer for their support.  The bike was delivered to the local Hermes Parcel Shop really well packaged and sealed on the 3rd Feb with a receipt obtained.  Sadly the parcel was emptied on route to the buyer.   I had listed the bike for collection only however the buyer messaged and asked if we could arrange a courier to which I agreed and they organised that.  When the bike went missing I contacted the local police as the Hermes parcel shop said they would not release CCTV to me.  We got all this from the Police.  since then the buyer has tried his very best which I am grateful with Hermes and parcel2go but is struggling.  Any help is appreciated. 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Sneaky charges applied to Santander 123 Bank account

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2560 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have a Santander Bank account 123.


I have no overdraft on this account (they refused me)

but that's ok as its a little account I have and not my main one.


I have text alerts to say my statement is ready

however I went into m account tonight on line (paperless statements)

to find that I had a charge of £45 taken out.


I called them to be told that in Jan 2014 I spent £26 in a shop on my debit card

and that took me £22 over into an unauthorised overdraft.


They took the charge today and this has caused me to go overdrawn again

(I wouldn't have been if they hadn't applied the charge) .


I have picked this up today and will cover the amount overdrawn tomorrow


however I am totally miffed off that a transaction put through by a shop

and authorised by them has cost me £45.


They said its my responsibility to check

however where was my text asking me if I knew the account had gone into unauthorised O D mode.


I am not able to have Good will Gesture as they told me I had one 2th FEb 2 yrs ago


Am I wrong to be miffed at this sneaky charge.

I want to take it further.

I will be closing the account after the next DDs come out end of the month

not that this will impact them but I will feel better


Views please and advice or pointers.


They have logged a complaint but made it clear I will NOT get them back

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not wrong to be miffed but sadly it is in the T&C's.


This happened to me and I complained and complained and went to the Fos who upheld the banks decision,


I asked them to look at it again and they still upheld the banks decision.


They gae me some ballcocks about floor limits and stuff .


Personally i do not believe a word and they will get the money back over my dead body,

even if I have to pay at £1 a month for the rest of my life

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your reply,


They also told me about floor limits and I told them straight I didn't care about floor limits

they have my number as they text me re statements

therefore they have a duty of care to me as my bank.


I thinks what I am annoyed at is the fact they have taken me overdrawn again with their charge

and wouldn't have told me..


They are a pitiful load of crap with robotic agents who are scripted,


I am fuming would like to swear but respect the site too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are moth called Satan for nothing. What you need to watch for is them trying to charge you again. Even if you close your account. It has been known.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The overdraft charges are pre-notified.


It wasn't Santander or the shop that took you into an unarranged overdraft - it was YOUR payment. You took yourself overdrawn.


You also have a duty of care to yourself to manage your own finances adequately. It is your responsibility to check your account and you have so many options to do so: internet banking, ATMs, mobile banking, telephone banking, branches etc.


You can also setup text alerts but you have to proactively so this through internet banking yourself (as not everybody will appreciate them).


The floor limit maybe relevant because it means that your available balances isn't checked before initiating the transaction. This means that the bank can't stop you from going into an unarranged overdraft.


Why not take the time to re-evaluate they way you manage your finances?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...