Jump to content


Varde & old MBNA card Debt - scotland


tigercub
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Think I will concentrate in the most important part first which is sorting out the current court case - Paperwork has been today sent Special Delivery so should get there tomorrow or at the very latest Monday. I will keep everyone posted on the next stage in the saga

 

Thanks again for everyones help - now it's in the hands of the courts................... ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Cheers Capricorn1661

 

MandM thanks for your message the other day tried to reply however your inbox is full: Paperwork all sent Friday so will keep everyone informed of how I get on.....

 

Fingers crossed all the hard work that has gone into this over the last 2 years is going to come to a climax soon ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Capricorn1661

 

MandM thanks for your message the other day tried to reply however your inbox is full: Paperwork all sent Friday so will keep everyone informed of how I get on.....

 

Fingers crossed all the hard work that has gone into this over the last 2 years is going to come to a climax soon ;-)

 

Cleared some space now ooopps. I keep forgetting that bit.

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update for you:

 

Received a letter from HMCS (Her Majesty’s Court Service) on Saturday morning with regards to my defence sent to them last week it reads as follows:

 

I acknowledge receipt of your defence. A copy is being served on the claimant (Or the claimants solicitor) The claimant may contact you direct to attempt to resolve any dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved informally the claimant will inform the court that he wishes to proceed. The court will then inform you of what will happen.

 

Where he wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28 days after receiving a copy of your defence. After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay.

 

So the countdown has begun lets see what happens from here – Fingers crossed people ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in Scotland, does this case have any jurisdiction from the Northampton Court ?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

None what so ever! 1st part of my defence see few posts back:

 

  1. Jurisdiction

Denied that this court has jurisdiction. The defendant resides at ************ * SCOTLAND, This is his principal or main home and the defendant has domiciled here for the purpose of section 41 of the Civil Jurisdiction & Judgments Act 1982 ('the 1982 Act'). The defendant entered into a contractual agreement with the original creditor as a consumer. Paragraph 3(4) to schedule 8 of the 1982 Act provides as follows: "(4) Proceedings may be brought against a consumer by the other party to the contract only in the courts for the place where the consumer is domiciled or any court having jurisdiction under rule 2(i)". Rule 2(i) concerns moveable property which has been arrested and is not applicable. Paragraph 3(6) does not apply. Accordingly, this action is incompetent for want of jurisdiction and should be dismissedlink3.gif with expenses in favour of the defendant. The defendant formally requests that the case be struck out due to lack of jurisdiction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine the case will just get stayed.....

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The phone calls over the last few days have been ramped up by Experto - my belief is that they thought by taking this to court and issuing papers to me that I may pay up however as I have nothing to give or even offer then that option is null and void and there attempt at a final scare tactic has failed miserably with them looking like idiots so we will wait and see what happens over the next few weeks anyway.......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right.... why would they be calling you? Stand your ground.....They just trying to pull a fast one....

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought by someone who knows nothing much at all about procedure in England, is it worth a phone call to see if its possible to have the case declared incompetent - which is a Scottish concept so wrong word - as given the Civil Jurisdiction etc Act the court from which you have been served the papers, lacks jurisdiction ( ie it not only has no right to hear it, but the Act seems to me to make clear that the court is being specifically told that the case has to be heard elsewhere and its not in England). The answer might well be that it has to go through the normal process, but it might be worth asking the question on the off chance. Perhaps a special motion to the court - just to short circuit things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Seriously fed up.....

 

Anybody have any thoughts? - I have been away all week and have not had any word from Experto on the court case so time is ticking for them to do something within there 28 day limit as given by the court.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Seriously fed up.....

 

Anybody have any thoughts? - I have been away all week and have not had any word from Experto on the court case so time is ticking for them to do something within there 28 day limit as given by the court.........

 

 

When is the 28 days up? Sounds like they will let it stay. They tried it on in the vain hope you would get scared and pay the unenforceable debt.

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - I have just come back from a few days working away to find three calls from Experto Credite, no doubt there will be an interesting letter in the post winging it's way to me as we speak........... We will then see what they have to say for themselves..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick - Update - I have heard nothing from either Varde, Experto, MBNA or the Court as yet...................... The 28 days for Varde to take this to court has expired almost a week ago........

 

I will keep you posted if I here anything at all ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have great pleasure in stating that I have today received word back from Court and the correspondence reads as follows:

 

“ I am writing to confirm that the above case was stayed on 7th March 2011. As such no further action can be taken without the claimant making a formal application to lift the stay”

 

Yours Faithfully

Her Majesty’s court service

 

I think we can count this as a SUCCESS ;-) :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...