Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA - At my wits end. HELP!!!!


Fiery_Princess
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon Everyone,

 

Advice needed, or alternatively, a lift to Swansea!!!

 

I'll try to be brief, and to the point.

 

Hubby went for job interview, last Monday morning, as a CE Driver.

Took licence with him to interview,

only to find out, CE entitlement had been removed

 

Phoned Swansea, their reply "As you didn't meet the sight requirements, we revoked your licence"

 

Rewind back to last year,

 

Hubby went for his medical, as required, and the Numpty (as he will now be known! Lol) forgot to take his glasses.

 

DVLA wrote to us and said he had to take another eye test, which he did, and he passed.

Eyesight test was on the 27th, form had to be back ioth them by the 30th.

 

Form was posted on 27th, so would have been back in time,

however DVLA didn't scan it on to their system until the 7th,

hence being outside their deadline.

 

Numpty, however did not pick up on this when his new licence arrived,

he, and I, just assumed as we had sent the new eyetest off in time, everything was ok

 

back to this year,

filled in Form D2,

emailed to DVLA Monday 10th February 2014,

received read receipt at 13.40.

this time, we have proof they have the form!!!

 

Phoned them, to be told it takes 72hrs for forms to be scanned on to their system.

will phone back Thursday.

Phoned Thursday to be told, it sometimes takes longer.

phone back Saturday, to be told "There is currently a back log, we are dealing with emails received on the 8th.

 

we'll wait a couple of days, and phone back then.

Phone back this morning, it's now over a week since form was sent in.

Guess what, they still don't have it.

They're now processing emails from the 13th,

they've gone straight past it,

but they haven't lost it?!

But to send it in again,

 

I mean WTF?

we can email again, even though they lose them,

or we can post them, but know full well that it will get delayed

 

Where is the accountability?

How can they get away with this?

How can they blatantly lose something, and deny they have?

And whilst all this is going on,

we have no money coming into the house.

so we're having a fine old time here

 

Just so, so cross with them! And to make it seem worse,

Numpty's medical is fine, his photocard is fine,

every god damned thing is fine,

apart from 1 box with a cross in it,

and his signature,

and yet they still can't issue a licence!!!!

 

Arrgggghhhh!!! :evil::evil::evil::evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain, to their complaints team.

You could try the Customer Complaint Resolution Team, who have a fax on 0845 850 0095.

(PM me if you need a phone number, I'm not sure if the number I have is for "the team" or "an individual", and so don't want to post it publicly).

 

If you are speaking to their standard "Medical Enquiries" droids, be prepared to be told that:

a) Your previous calls were noted, and the recordings will be checked (I never had any sign mine were ....)

b) your previous complaint was never logged as a complaint, and/or

c) that your subsequent complaint(s) was/were noted as "should have been logged as a complaint", but still hasn't actually been actioned as a complaint, and/or

d) "the complaints team don't speak directly to the public", and/or

e) there is no complaints escalation "beyond a further review by the complaints team, who you can't speak to" (there is: by the DVLA chief exec), and/or

f) there is no external complaints body, and you can't complain to the Minister of State for Transport or your MP (yes, you can, you can complain to your MP, who may pass it on to the Parliamentary / Civil Service Ombudsman)

 

Record your calls, as they may well later accuse you of "being mistaken" if you mention being told any of the above.

 

Keep copies of all documentation you send, for those minor inconveniences of when they say "never received it, start from scratch again".

Send anything Special Delivery (as they have to sign for these individually, as opposed to signing en masse for Recorded Delivery). It costs much more but makes it much harder for them to claim non-receipt.

 

In case you detect a degree of bitterness ..... all of the above happened to me. However, it is fine, as in the end I got a letter saying "I can assure you we are not complacent about the service we provide". The letter was so superficial and glib, not actually adressing any of the itemised issues I'd raised that I gave up (rare for me, but I had to recognise the amount of effort it would take to achieve any more meaningful response), hence my skepticism of the process.

 

Take careful note of their 'service standard times". Be prepared for them to be exceeded, or, if you complain, for them to issue a license on the last possible day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...