Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

here we go:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks like i got no choice but to pay their £190 fee's cos read on another thread your not allowed to remove the clamp once Levied, just confusing as some say if it wasnt my car so be it if car disappears, then read elsewhere NO dont touch clamp. Im so stressed now

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes that's Rossendale's version of a form 7

 

 

why would you pay the fees

 

 

1) its not your vehicle

2) proof was provided at the time of the levy that the vehicle wasn't yours

3) you are not responsible for the actions of the owner (removing the clamp)

4) the £160 fee charged under other is unlawful the only fee that can be charged the day of the levy is the levy fee and walking possession fee (if the walking possession is signed) if the goods belong to the debtor then the fee is legal in your situation its not

 

 

the £160 fee is probably an attendance to remove fee they used to try and get away with it by calling it an enforcement fee and cant be charged the same day as the levy

http://www.bexley.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=3028&p=0

C For one attendance with a vehicle with a view to the removal of goods (where,

following the levy, goods are not removed):

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :-) Dont want the owner getting into trouble taking clamp off though. Can they track where car is to get them done for it?

 

If they did it would be the bailiff getting sued for Tort unlawful interference with goods as an option. If the clamp is applied unlawfully for a third party debt then the rightful owner can sue for the consequential loss including car hire whilst their car is unlawfully clamped.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tuesday to clamp car

 

I would contend he knows he couldn't seize the car as it is the property of a 3rd party - his story of he can as you were observed in it is pure fantasy. In any case I would also say as he has never been back to check he has abandoned his levy anyway. He may say he totally forgot about the clamp - in which case charge him storage for the clamp.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ploddertom do they have to come back within a certain amount of time 'once clamped' To take the car away or would it be classed now as Abandoned Levy.. To be honest i thought they was just making me sweat to pay the £190 charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ploddertom do they have to come back within a certain amount of time 'once clamped' To take the car away or would it be classed now as Abandoned Levy.. To be honest i thought they was just making me sweat to pay the £190 charges

 

In theory the fact it was clamped is a form of impounding. However he should make regular checks to make sure the goods are in good order, in my view this should at least be every 3-5 days and as it is now 1 week+ then he lost any chance to be able to do anything'

 

I don't doubt that any approach made to Rossendales will result in lots of hot air about why they have done nothing wrong - most of it comes from their new book Bailiffs for Dummies.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks i will just wait till they come to me and act dumb regarding car, then hand them clamp back un damaged ' Taken photo's for proof'. Just dare not have another car on my drive incase they bloody clamp that too for outstanding fee's 'which is ridiculous way to live'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks i will just wait till they come to me and act dumb regarding car, then hand them clamp back un damaged ' Taken photo's for proof'. Just dare not have another car on my drive incase they bloody clamp that too for outstanding fee's 'which is ridiculous way to live'

 

Hand him the clamp, and sing him the bailiff lost clamp lament to a blues riff

 

AHH woke up dis moaning

And I found the car was gone

said AHH woke up dis moaning

And I found the car was gone

Rightful owner took it

the clamp he done left it

On the drive den he's gone

 

No seriously just tell him the owner came took the car, and cut off the clamp, and you were not in at the time so don't know when it went. He might huff and puff but as it isn't your car he would be cutting his own throat if he was daft enough to call the plod.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol :lol:

 

Its funny because Equita posted a Form 7 on the same car

BUT a week earlier than Rossendales for an outstanding bill to another Council,

but i paid that in full too,

 

Equita saying i owe them £62 for their calling out fee's

but i said legally you only allowed to charge me £42.50 for 2 visits but they said no its £62...

 

so both Bailiff companies put Levy on same car

Link to post
Share on other sites

visit fees and levy fees cannot BOTH be charged on the same [one] visit.

it must be one or the other.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

 

no this is with Equita

 

they put a Levy on same car as Rossendales ' week before Rossendales'

 

Rang them up today as id paid my LO off other day along with Rossendales LO,

 

but Equita said fee's are outstanding of £62 for visits but i refused to pay saying it was £42.50 they say its not

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as I know

 

two visits = £42.50 like you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here, perhaps Crapquita have been online and amended the online bailiff Wikifees and invented a Removal of Unlawful Levy Fee of £20

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Equita yesterday to send me a breakdown of the £62 fee,

received it today and

 

it just said Removal Fee of £62.

 

Obviously once they put Levy on car on 3rd they must of done a DVLA check for ownership

and known car wasnt mine

or they'd of Clamped it before Rossendales did on the 11th.

 

So guess i will have to pay the 62

whenever i have it or they gonna hound me

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you do not have to pay it

 

they have no levy on YOUR goods

 

they cant charge an attendance to remove fee if they have removed the levy fee

because they confirmed with the dvla that the car does not belong to you

then the attendance to remove fee should have also been removed from your account

 

you really need to make formal complaint to the ceo of the local authority's concerned (bailiff levying goods that do not belong to the debtor and charging fees

 

Has a bailiff "levied" upon a car that is NOT owned by you ??... LOCAL GOVERNMENT Ombudsmanlink3.gif'S Report !!!!

 

read post 6 of this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?374293-Local-Government-Ombudsman-Report-on-Councils-and-Bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a question 'yes another' :razz: Friend back tomorrow and wants to personally take clamp into Rossendales, can he swear on Oath at local courts or solicitors stating car is his before he goes seen as they wont take documents as proof of ownership?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys just updating regarding this matter.

 

No heard anything from Rossendales since they clamped my friends car until today,

 

was out all day and come back home to a Final Notice of £160 for council tax.

 

but i have a letter of payment from council showing im paid in full,

now this £160 is for the fees they charged me on the day of clamping my friends car ' clamp is still in garage'

 

What do i do,

 

are they going to try seize goods or clamp another car for these fee's?

 

Thought id seen back of these, but its a different Bailiff thats attended today

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...