Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG Arrangement to Pay


webinteractions
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am preparing to apply for a mortgage and have checked my credit file using Experian and Equifax. Equifax is showing an 'arrangement to pay' for four consecutive months in Feb 2009 and my account settled in April 2010, yet there is no mention of this in Experian.

 

I would really like to find out more information regarding why they have done this. I don't remember any conversation about putting me on a payment plan/

 

So, how would i go about finding this information out? Also, do i stand a chance of getting this removed?

 

I appreciate any feedback you could give me.

 

thank you/

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar to Canadian square address

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

Would you mind confirming that this is the correct address:

 

Canada Square Operations

PO Box 4903

Worthing

BN99 3AR

 

Also, i don't have any details of this account. If i provide previous addresses, DOB, Name and inform them i had a credit card. Will that be sufficient enough information for them to track down my account? I don't them to send a letter back with some excuse! Using Equifax, i have start date and date satisfied and the last 4 digits of the account number/credit card number not sure which it is.

 

For the £10 i will have to go to the post office so i will use a postal order. Who do i make this payable to? Canada Square Operations?

 

thank you both for your help, i really appreciate it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the mcol should have the claimform should have the card number?

 

if not the cra file will hold the last 4 digits?

 

an sar is on YOU not the card.

 

so if all effect, its needs no number as such.

 

you certainly need to include the address when the card was acquired

and any other details you think fit to ID you.

 

I would also inc a copy of your CTAX bill or some other official doc

to prove you are resident where you are now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

water ok.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Well i am still waiting for the documentation to come through. It's taking an age but in the mean time i have been trying to piece together exactly what happened. This is my theory:

 

Judging from my credit history I went over my credit card limit by £35. They must have rang and suggested they would increase my credit card limit temporarily and asked if i would pay twice my usual monthly payments over the next four months - £25 to £50. This lasted for four months in which it reverted back to normal.

 

Not once did they inform me this would have any adverse effect on my credit and definitely didn't mention an 'arrangement to pay'. I have looked up the arrangement to pay definition on the ICO website. It states:

 

"An ‘arrangement to pay’

 

This involves a temporary, short-term (up to six months) arrangement

where the lender agrees to accept reduced payments. "

 

Now, i didn't ask them to reduce payments and in fact i paid twice as much! I didn't ask them to halt any interest and they came to me to suggest this arrangement and did not inform of any adverse implications it would have on my credit report. Anyone have any idea whether my complaint could be upheld and the Arrangement to Pay removed from my file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Did you press the point that you were paying double not less each month?

SAR time scale is 40 calendar days from the date received by the creditor.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have replied today saying i needed to sign it, 90% sure i did but sent it off again today. Does the 40 day count start again? They state in their letter "Please resend your request with your signature to enable us to release your documents." I hope that means they are sat waiting to be sent out..

 

I haven't sent my complaint yet. I wanted to get opinions from you fine people first and see if anyone else has any other points to raise or suggestions. When i do write my complaint I think my letter will raise several points, these are as follows:

 

1) Arrangement to Pay markers on my account on this particular occasion is unjustified and unfair. Perhaps 1 month late payment marker would have been more appropriate?

2) I was not made aware the implications on my credit report of agreeing to their suggested plan.

3) As you mentioned, paying double the amount and not less which is not in accordance to the definitions set by the ICO. (I have bank statements to prove i paid double during the 4 months of the AP Markers). I will send these off with my complaint.

4) Still paying interest on the credit card payments.

 

I have spent hours on forums trying to find someone with a case like mine to no avail. I have found many who were on DMPs, or asked them to reduce the payments or asked to halt interest and/or paying token payments of a £1 a month etc etc. But nothing like this! What do you reckon my chances are?

Edited by webinteractions
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi No the 40 days runs from the day they received the original SAR.

It is not often we see cases where a person can agree to pay more to resolve a problem as you can probably guess.

 

 

I think recording this as an AP is manifestly unfair.

 

 

A formal complaint to the Data Controller of the creditor is often very effective in such matters. I would think the AP markers were decided by their software with no human intervention e.g. anything agreed that is different from that contractually required must have a label.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 days starts from when they get a compliant sar request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello ClareAllan.

 

I've had a look at your thread and cannot believe how similar our situations are! I sent my SAR around the February 13th along with gas bill to prove who i am but i must have forgotten to sign the letter as they came back mid March asking for the request again with a signature, so don't forget to sign! I am still waiting for the documentation, think its around 45 days now since the original request so i am getting slightly impatient. I will give it till April 14th before sending a letter reminding them of the 40 calendar days to reply.

 

I have subscribed to your thread and I will definitely keep you informed of my progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no reason for not signing a SAR, would you like your data to be available to any person who might have even minimal details of one of your accounts?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh good! I'm so pleased we've made contact. I will also be sure to keep you posted. Like you, I definitely was not informed of any effect on my credit rating, nor that this was an arrangement to pay. They did not freeze the interest and I kept up at least the minimum payments (whether I paid more I'm not sure - I'll have to check that out). As you say, this does not fit the ICO definition as to what constitutes an Arrangement to Pay and therefore surely having it marked as such on your credit history is misinformation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all,

its been around 60 days since they received my original SAR (unsigned)

 

and a little over 20 days since i sent the original request but with my signature.

 

I am also counting weekends as i am sure i read that they count?

 

Am i being impatient or is it time to send them a letter reminding them

 

they have not complied within the 40 day ruling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 40 cal days runs from when they receive a compliant SAR.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...