Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unenforceable agreements under the Consumer Credit Act


Stub001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Sorry if this has been put in wrongly but I have some on who is very very worried about this agreement and I have looked at it and think its wrong but would like some one to confirm this.

sorry tried to load but could not so here goes and if its not right then soory,

Hire Purchase Agreement cc act 1974.

Details of Hire(?) these are the finance companies

Deatails of the customer These are his but the surname is worngly set out.

Goods:

Amount of credit £6083.00

Duration of agreement 30 (nothing else) 30 what?

Repayment £381.01

APR 47%

one payment of £250.00 payable followed by 29 months at £318.01

Cash price £9000.

IPT Goods £250.00

Vat free goods £33.

Total Cash price (T) £9283.00

Deposit paid £3200.00

Advance £6083.00

Interest (X) £3457.30

Documentation fee (Y) £250.00

Option to purchase fee (Z) £5.00

X+y+z = tOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT © £3712.30

T+C Total amount payable £12995.30

 

Some of the figures do not add up and the company is under a different name.

any help would be very gratefully accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Can a Credit Card Application containing Key Financial Information (interest rates etc, loss and theft of card and genral information about missing payments and default charges be said to be an Consumer Credit Agreement. It also says 'once you have signed this agreement, you will have a short time to cancel it. We will send you the exact details of how and when you can do this.'

There is no credit amount or credit limit. At the end it below my signature it says By signing this you authorise us when considering YOUR APPLICATION to gain additional relevant information, credit references, electoral role etc

My signature is on the application form, and a section where they initial they recieved my proof of ID, not actually signing the agreement.

 

It also has - we will tell you your credit limit when you first revieve your card.

 

My question is can an application for a credit card, be used as a enforcable CCA??

Link to post
Share on other sites

1273

 

Please ask quetsions on one thread only or start your own thread

 

 

An application for can be an enforceable agreement if it has the debtor's signature and the prescribed terms - credit limit, repayment terms and interest rate (for a credit card, anyway)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, i am new to this and i am looking for some advice..i signed an agreement with Abbey when i was 16 and stopped using the account a month after i turned 18. since then it has been 19 months and i opened a letter from abbey who claim i owe them £83.47 in bank charges due to a direct debit failing. it is my understanding that being as i signed when i was under 16 this is not a legal abiding contract so the charges are not enforceable or am i incorrect???? any help will be much appreciated. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Sorry if this has been put in wrongly but I have some on who is very very worried about this agreement and I have looked at it and think its wrong but would like some one to confirm this.

sorry tried to load but could not so here goes and if its not right then soory,

Hire Purchase Agreement cc act 1974.

Details of Hire(?) these are the finance companies

Deatails of the customer These are his but the surname is worngly set out.

Goods:

Amount of credit £6083.00

Duration of agreement 30 (nothing else) 30 what?

Repayment £381.01

APR 47%

one payment of £250.00 payable followed by 29 months at £318.01

Cash price £9000.

IPT Goods £250.00

Vat free goods £33.

Total Cash price (T) £9283.00

Deposit paid £3200.00

Advance £6083.00

Interest (X) £3457.30

Documentation fee (Y) £250.00

Option to purchase fee (Z) £5.00

X+y+z = tOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT © £3712.30

T+C Total amount payable £12995.30

 

Some of the figures do not add up and the company is under a different name.

any help would be very gratefully accepted.

 

Check if they have charged interest on the Documentation Fee and the Option to purchase fee. If they have done so the agreement is unenforceable under Section 9(4) of the Consumer Credit Act which reads, “for the purposes of this act, an item entering into the total charge for credit shall not be treated as credit even though time is allowed for its payment” By adding interest they are treating the fees as credit. Welcome are notorious for ths.

It is also a good idea to check that the interest calculations are correct and are as stated. There is a small amount of leeway allowd but any large differences make the agreement unenforcable as the terms are mis-stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I have a good one and maybe someone can advise ??

I was being contacted by a company called Credit Solutions Ltd on behalf of Barclaycard and on the 25th of June 09 I sent to them the template letter requesting my credit agreement and the £1.00 cheque.

Never received a dicky bird from them regarding my request but then again got a standard letter from them saying something like !! we can make arrangements for you to repay over extended period !! ect but no mention about the agreement.

So on the 15 September 09 I sent the next template letter saying they failed to supply my agreement ect but still no reply at all.

Now today 30th October 09 I got a very snotty letter from a different company called Moorecroft Debt Recovery Ltd on behalf of Barclaycard stating intended litigation before legal proceeding ?? and even states We believe that this letter fulfils this requirement even if is not actually read by you.

So now what do I do ?? do I have to start over again and send another £1.00 to another company asking again for a copy of my agreement ??

Any sugestions welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's are usually only AGENTS acting for the original creditor. Unless there has been an assignment they cannot act on their own behalf,

 

Most of them are pussies, especially moorcroft. i could build a rather nice bonfire with all the various threats of legal action I've had from them :)

 

ignore them and go for the original creditor. or the cycle will continue

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your original s78 request still stands. You need to write to Moorcroft and point out that you made a request to Barclaycard for a copy of the agreement as is your statutory right under the Consumer Credit Act, Barclaycard have failed to respond. While they are in breach of S78 they are not entitled to enforce the debt and passing the debt to a collecting agent and threatening litigation is a very clear breach. You could also point out that should they issue court proceedings you have grounds for defence as Barclaycard are in breach of S78(6) (I think that is the right one PM me and remind me and I will check the CCA on Monday or google it) and S127(3) does not allow the court to make a judgment unless a copy of the credit agreement exists, signed by the debtor and creditor bearing the prescribed terms as laid out in S61.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellsbells

 

in a perfect world you may be right, but this site is littered with people who had "an iron clad case" and lost.

 

the lenders and dca's are a bunch of %&??!! and bend the law to suit themselves, and we have very little recourse.

 

things arent always black and white, a lot depends on what judge you get and his or her predujices

 

a case in point -------> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/191784-shakespeare62-nastybank.html

 

Masamps

 

a simple letter to moorcroft, or any of the other dca's will send them packing, or just ignore them is fine too they usually wont do anything let alone make a personal call. you need to concentrate on the main creditor.

 

Barclaycard are one of the more difficult ones, they prevaricate and send you the bare minimum of information. I am in the middle of a battle with them at the moment, however......that said I have won twice with them PPI and charges on another Credit card....(they must hate me by now)

 

The thing is BC have to send you a copy of the the agreement. what you will get though may not be what you expected. ie not a photocopy of it but a "reconstructed version" or a simple card carrier.

 

while they are in default you may with-hold payments....but they will still report this to the cra's (unlawfully)

 

have a look at ----> why you shouldnt use section 77/78 CCA 1974 if you want the signed agreement - The Consumer Forums

 

but before you do anything make sure you understand what you are doing.

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree that this a lot depends on the judge in many cases, The county courts are bound by High Court decisions and these types of cases are often won on appeal. A bit of homework into relevant case law always helps.

I do this all day every day for a living and a letter to Moorcroft and most DCAs will make them send the debt back to the original creditor and get them off of your back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i was wondering if anyone can answer a question for me....

 

if an agreement does not contain

 

"your rights"

you have the right to cancal this agreement"

 

is it cancelable????

 

Thanks

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/217001-cancellation-rights-plus-discussion.html

 

M1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - this may be a help to some of you - I have been disputing a debt with Littlewoods due the excessive amount of charges they have placed on my account, this has been going on for a couple of years. Got a letter from Lowell Financial as they hve taken over the debt, sent them the letter requesting that they send me a copy of my credit agreement in which they had 12 days to reply as got this response back:

 

We refer to your request for a copy of the original credit agreement for this account.

 

After liaising with Shop Direct in an effort to obtain this document we have been advised that it is no longer available due to the length of time since the account was opened.

 

As this time we have closed your file and will not make any further contact with your concerning payment against this account unless the copy of the agreement is received.

 

By the way the amount of the alleged debt was £2089.33 so keep fighting people it does work at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is good news Persha:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - this may be a help to some of you - I have been disputing a debt with Littlewoods due the excessive amount of charges they have placed on my account, this has been going on for a couple of years. Got a letter from Lowell Financial as they hve taken over the debt, sent them the letter requesting that they send me a copy of my credit agreement in which they had 12 days to reply as got this response back:

 

We refer to your request for a copy of the original credit agreement for this account.

 

After liaising with Shop Direct in an effort to obtain this document we have been advised that it is no longer available due to the length of time since the account was opened.

 

As this time we have closed your file and will not make any further contact with your concerning payment against this account unless the copy of the agreement is received.

 

By the way the amount of the alleged debt was £2089.33 so keep fighting people it does work at times.

 

I had exactly the same reply as above from Lowell Financial however 3 days Later I got a letter for the same debt from a different dca acting on behalf of

Lowell Financial

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you send them the same letter asking for a "true copy" - no company can enforce the debt unless they have a copy of your agreement, so if they new dca are unable to produce it they cannot enforce it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I can't go into the details because it is still on going but I have been informed by a solicitor (who has agreed to take the case on) that the law permits for the repayment of monies paid towards an unenforceable debt.

 

HOWEVER it is difficult and can be a protracted process, the only benefit is that in the current economic climate the last thing banks want is their name in lights regarding taking money that wasn't 'legally' theirs.

 

I am lucky and have found a solicitor that thinks he can win and make a name for himself!!! I will let you all know what happens and will make a donation to the site as it was because of advice from caggers that gave me the confidence to do battle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've requested several companies to supply the agreements under the CCA along with the £1 fee each and have given more time than is necessary for their responses. None have supplied an enforceable agreement therefore I have written to them challenging the lack of agreement or the unenforceable paperwork supplied.

 

I have done all of this by use of template letters from this site.

 

My latest letters refer to their breaches etc. and state that I will be forced to report them to Trading Standards and contact the OFT due to breaches of the OFT Debt Collection Guidance unless they either supply the enforceable agreement or write off the alleged debt.

 

I have either received confirmation that they are unable to enforce the debt or no communication from the others at all.

 

Am I likely to get any of the debts written off or should I go ahead with contacting Trading Standards and the OFT at this point?

 

If all debts are unenforceable but details remain on my credit file for the next 6 years, I have been advised to consider bankruptcy since my poor health has resulted in me being on minimal benefits with no other income, assets or savings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't go into the details because it is still on going but I have been informed by a solicitor (who has agreed to take the case on) that the law permits for the repayment of monies paid towards an unenforceable debt.

 

HOWEVER it is difficult and can be a protracted process, the only benefit is that in the current economic climate the last thing banks want is their name in lights regarding taking money that wasn't 'legally' theirs.

 

I am lucky and have found a solicitor that thinks he can win and make a name for himself!!! I will let you all know what happens and will make a donation to the site as it was because of advice from caggers that gave me the confidence to do battle.

 

HI

 

Be careful here.

 

Just because an agreement is not enforceble under the cca does not mean that the money is not owed, or that the creditor does not have title to the debt.

 

The courts are very clear about this if however you can show that the agreement was incorrectly executed and missled you about the amount of interest or other charges that you incurred you may be able to sue for re-embursement of these.

 

Cheers

peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

can anyone clear this up for me please???

i requested a true copy of credit card agreement on 6th june this year to barclaycard. i as advised that this copy has to be signed and must be an original copy. Barclaycard took over from morgan stanley whom i took the credit card out with originally. Barclaycard sent me a copy of their terms and conditions, no signature on 17th june 2009. At the top of this letter it states ' these are the terms and conditions of an agreement between us (Barclays Bank PLC, Barclaycard Centre, Northampton NN4 7SG) and you, the person who signed the agreement' s

So where's the signed agreement???

 

is this debt enforcable. I sent futher letters stating they have not complied etc and the harrassment letter. Six months later i'm still being pursued for the debt and Calder Financial are now contacting me for the debt.

I actually answered their cal this morning and asked them what info Barclaycard have passed on and they replied saying they had sent me the executed agreement under s 78 of the consumer credit act and that they don't need to send a signed copy as when a consumer takes a credit card out no signature is required???

 

Thanks

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...