Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest (old stat barred LLoyds debt) query


JGJ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I sent Capquest a "Stat Barred Letter" circa Sep 2013 re an alleged old debt from Lloyds. This is definately stat barred by many months.

 

In late oct 2013 they replied firstly with an apology re the delayed response.then up pops, the our investigations have revealed that I made a mystery £1payment into the account some 3 years earlier and therefore the acc. is not Stat Barred.

 

Further they also state that they are not in a position to cease processing my data as they are the legal owners of the acc. The default on the cras file was originally entered by Lloyds and then updated by Capquest upon assignment.They are not in a position to remove the default, as they are obliged to update accurate information to the cras.(There are now 2 references re this alleged debt.)

 

Also they say that the account will remain on hold, as they have requested relevant copies of the statements from Lloyds and that they will be sent to me at the earliest opportunity. They also add that having reviewed the information received from me they believe that they have not made a mistake, as the acc is not stat barred.( Nothing further received since Oct 2014)

 

I sent them a further letter late Oct 2014 confirming the Stat Barred status of the acc and accepting no liability and that no payment will be made now or in the future re this alleged debt.

 

I also restated to them that having checked historical statements I can confirm that no such payment alleged by Capquest was ever personally made nor authorised by me.

 

Nothing further received from them since late Oct 2014.

 

All advice/info will be as usual gratefully received, re my next options / tacticts should be in ridding this pain in the backside, AKA Capquest.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Dear oh dear, cr@pquest attempting to defraud, whatever next!

 

I would simply have replied,

Dear Bill&Ben,

Thank you for your written confirmation that you are attempting to defraud me and are refusing to remove the inaccurate data you are reporting to the credit reference agencies.

I am now seeking legal advice with a view to taking legal action against you, I look forward to my day in court.

 

How long has this left to run on your CRF?

Have you informed the CRA's that they are reporting inaccurate data on your file?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fkofilee,

 

Phantom indeed, I will second guess that it was a well meaning benefactor that paid the enormous sum of £1 into the acc to help us out and maybe not to restart the SB clock ticking again, or am I being cynical??

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

No youre not being cynical

 

They sometimes do this... I would find out how that payment was made... Its important for the SB date.

If i remember rightly; Capquest are notorious for doing this... I remember seeing threads in the past on this.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon JGJ, responding to your PM.

 

 

Going to ask some questions.

 

 

1. What is the default date on the account?

2. What type of account was this?

3. Are we to understand that the Credit file date is wrong (2009) and the date is earlier in fact?

4. The £1 alleged payment: Could this be a CCA request fee?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BRIGADIER2JCS,

Thank you for your swift reply.

 

1) Def date 22 06 09 on CRAs, I have a Default notice in file from 2008.

2) Loan

3) May be a lot earlier,seem to remember lots of jousting with Lloyds sols after the bank charges decision from Supreme court was handed down, our accounts including Loan acc went into overdrive

4) Probably Moorcrap as they were one of the pursuers in the chase 6 all told and all gave up the chase.

5) Capquest appear to be attempting to defraud me, by insinuating the £1 payment was paid into a Loan acc not serviced since 2007.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok: Lets annoy from the top down.

 

 

Fao. Helen Ashton

CEO Capquest Group

Fleet 27

Rye Close

Fleet

Hants.

GU51 2QQ.

 

 

Date:................:

 

 

Ref: Use Theirs:

 

 

Formal Complaint:

Dear Ms. Ashton,

 

 

I refer you to correspondence between my self and Capquest regarding an alleged debt for £xxxx.xx original arising from an account with Lloyds Bank, this matter hasnow become rather protracted I want it dealt with promptly.

 

 

This alleged debt appears on my credit reference files with a default date of 22/06/09 whereas no payment or unequivocal written acknowledgment has been made sincc 2007.

 

 

Capquest has claimed that a payment of £1.00 was made on xx.xx.xxxx but have not provided unequivocal proof of any such payment being made or authorised by myself.

 

 

Give approximate date of this alleged payment I have checked my historical statements and no such payment appears.

 

 

Also I can conclude that the alleged payment is likely to be statutory fee for a request made under sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 (as amended) possible sent to Moorcroft which failed to comply with the lawful request and misappropriated the fee.

 

 

Mystery payments of £1.00 seem to feature in challenges as to the status of debts in regards to them being statute barred.

 

 

Therefore Capquests claim that the alleged debt is not statute barred is totally refuted.

 

 

I formally state that this alleged debt is statute barred and I will not now or in the future make any payment or offer of payment in regard to this matter.

 

 

I would now suggest that Capquest closes its file on this matter and takes commercial view that further pursuit of this statute barred debt will not achieve the result it seeks.

 

 

I refer you to Appendix B of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2006 updated Nov 2012, regarding the pursuit of statute barred debts.

 

 

This is my final response.

 

 

OK JGJ recorded signed for post check delivery.

 

 

 

 

 

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BRIGADIER2JCS,

 

Once again Sir I salute you.

 

Thank you very much for your "BRILLIANT" response to my request.

 

I will keep you informed.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

 

 

Thank you JGJ your thanks are much appreciated.

 

 

Good luck!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

I sent Capquest a "Stat Barred Letter" circa Sep 2013 re an alleged old debt from Lloyds. This is definately stat barred by many months.

 

In late oct 2013 they replied firstly with an apology re the delayed response.then up pops, the our investigations have revealed that I made a mystery £1payment into the account some 3 years earlier and therefore the acc. is not Stat Barred.

 

Further they also state that they are not in a position to cease processing my data as they are the legal owners of the acc. The default on the cras file was originally entered by Lloyds and then updated by Capquest upon assignment.They are not in a position to remove the default, as they are obliged to update accurate information to the cras.(There are now 2 references re this alleged debt.)

 

Also they say that the account will remain on hold, as they have requested relevant copies of the statements from Lloyds and that they will be sent to me at the earliest opportunity. They also add that having reviewed the information received from me they believe that they have not made a mistake, as the acc is not stat barred. ( Nothing further received since Oct 2014)

 

I sent them a further letter late Oct 2014 confirming the Stat Barred status of the acc and accepting no liability and that no payment will be made now or in the future re this alleged debt.

 

I also restated to them that having checked historical statements I can confirm that no such payment alleged by Capquest was ever personally made nor authorised by me.

 

Nothing further received from them since late Oct 2014.

 

All advice/info will be as usual gratefully received, re my next options / tacticts should be in ridding this pain in the backside, AKA Capquest.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

are you sure about those dates I have highlighted.. unless I have slept through most of 2014 or you are lucky enough to have your own tardis.. we havent reached October 2014.. yet !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

citizenB,

 

On the ball as usual, it is obviously a CAG system malfunction,:oops:

 

I think the learned council misheard, did I not say 2013??:oops:

 

Thank you for your input. I will now go and do some meditation.:oops:

 

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

ims21

 

Sent them a formal complaint letter to the CEO by signed for del, which they received the 14th Feb, not a word since. They should respond by back end of April,giving them 56 working days.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Debt Collection forums as requested :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Time scale for reply to Formal Complaint letter to DCA, is it 56 working days or other??

All advice/info will be as usual gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.capquest.co.uk/faqs.html

 

Seems they don't like to give themselves a time frame to respond, I would say 8 weeks maximum, then escalate it further, or simply ignore them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time scale for a formal complaint is 8 weeks, after which time you can escalate your complaint to an Ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Time scale for reply to Formal Complaint letter to DCA, is it 56 working days or other??

All advice/info will be as usual gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

56 calendar days.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your swift input it is gratefully received. Give them few more days then I will escalate . Do not like to be ignored and/ or, give them time to procrastinate at their leisure.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello All,

Still no reply from CEO Capquest and well over the 8weeks 56 days for their reply.

 

Escalation to Ombudsman or County Court, that is the question?

 

Ombudsman service does not appear to have improved.

 

All further advice will be gratefully received as usual.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO I would go through all the motions prior to legal action, at the very least the DJ will be able to see

that you have attempted to use the whole process before taking it down the legal route.

 

At least you will be able to show that these have frustrated the whole complaints process from the very beginning,

it can only go in your favour.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...