Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Why is government website carrying fake jobs?


45002
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

So what would happen if people filled in these bogus jobs on their job search sheet.

I would just keep adding them week after week - and what could the DWP do, the so called jobs are on their site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone else has said, this has been going on for years, under various governments. Over 20 years ago I did a temporary job in a Jobcentre (slightly better than being unemployed!), and it went on then, along with employers advertising a job at a salary, then offering it to a candidate for less on a pretext, and even one memorable employer who advertised for secretaries but actually trying to recruit girls for adult entertainment! The last was arrested, but all we could with the others was refuse to accept their vacancies; they then complained to regional management, said they wouldn't do it again - then did.

 

The problem is lack of deterrent and enforcement, not some conspiracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is lack of deterrent and enforcement, not some conspiracy.

 

Correct - nothing is a conspiracy, really. Or, to put it another way, "never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."

 

UJM is awful because, well, some idiot had a big idea and the problem turned out to be harder to solve than anyone actually thought. So now they have to make it compulsory and harass people because, well, the alternative is to admit failure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not the Gov's fault. It's the recruitment agents that post fake jobs to fish for contacts and leads. The labour market is fecked. "Jobs" don't exist anymore.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could start with: If it's an agency ask for the name of the company even if they don't publish it on the site 2) random checks on the company 3) take the agency to court if they are found to advertising fake jobs. But to accomplish this they'd need their own task force.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, but who who would police the task force?.. probably the very same DWP people who are allowing the fake jobs up there in the first place.

 

'The more things change, the more they stay the same'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also no real incentive to clean up bogus job vacancies as it inflates the numbers.

 

Might be a good start to reign in the company Kleeneaze. Ch 4 news found that most of the bogus jobs were advertised by them (or their employees).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid there's no way for the DWP to police this. How on earth would they verify if a vacancy was genuine?

 

To be fair, that's for them to work out, not us. If they're going to use the threat of starvation to force people to use their website, it's incumbent on them to ensure that said site is not a steaming pile of excrement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed a LOT of "work from home" jobs on their when I was looking

ALL of them were the [problem] ads, where you pay for "Information" which you then sell on by posting ads yourself

It's nuts.

Why they allow them is anyone's guess.

I always avoid anything that mentions starting your own "business".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be clear about this - UJM os a steaming pile of turd, it serves NO PURPOSE at all apart from being a spying machinr for JCP, DWP and WP providers. There are no REAL jobs on there all that it offers is zero contract jobs, catalogue distribution, cleaning and workfare activities.

 

From about 2 weeks in to being unemployed I refused to use it and it is not on my JSA agreement to do so, my advisers at JCP were happy with this as I proved I use many other external sources to search for work (albeit I now think a lot of advertised jobs on there are bogus) but at least it seems more real.

 

I am highly educated and have many years of work experience and I refused to use UJM as it provide NO HELP whatsoever to someone looking for positions at the higher end of the market. I even had one adviser tell me it was rubbish and would not benefit me at all.

 

So, to be frank and honest to you all - you won't find real work using UJM, it is a tool devised to keep tabs on you - simple as that.

 

It should be scrapped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UJM makes the WP's agents life easy to apply for fake jobs on behalf of the jobseekers. I've seen it done. My former WP agent told me.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't take them an hour a day to remove and block all the fake ads

Any ad which diverts you to CV submission sites, should raise a red flag, not to mention the "Start you rown business" ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's not hard but it's too simple for those in charge.

The amount of bureaucracy involved in doing anything with Gov't is laughable.

if any council in the UK was a business they'd all go out of business.

Someone somewhere is accountable for the UJM and person is trying to protect their job and your expense.

its pretty obvious the UJM wasn't tested properly but it was signed off as fit for purpose by someone in a govt who's scared of failure and doesn't want to seen as wasting public money.....Well guess what!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Isn't it good to know we're in safe hands?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

https://jobsearch.direct.gov.uk/GetJob.aspx?JobID=8059837

 

Another fake one.

 

They keep allowing a certain company to post jobs who I know is striking off his compNy. I worked for this guy and was lied to and then not paid. I had to take him to court for wages were he continued to lie (badly). He continues to take people on, put them in a job, then doesn't pay up. I was assured by my "advisor", after providing all the proof that he would not be allowed to post adverts. Unsurprisingly he's still posting. I flagged this again through the site and was told "you'll have to speak to your advisor". I replied "I have been signed off for two years. Do not assume I am a claimant.." No reply but he's still posting....absolute joke

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said it before. If a jobseeker is out of pocket or has his or her personal data, security and identity compromised, then they should be apologised to and compensated in full by the DWP ASAP. The DWP should then pursue these conmen through the courts for the monies owed.

 

 

An alternative should ideally be a class action lawsuit against Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey, DWP and JCP. They are the ones making it mandatory for jobseekers to use the unfit for purpose UJM and apply for vacancies hat are highly dubious to say the least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smoeone needs to start collecting evidence then XD

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...