Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Why is government website carrying fake jobs?


45002
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

So what would happen if people filled in these bogus jobs on their job search sheet.

I would just keep adding them week after week - and what could the DWP do, the so called jobs are on their site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone else has said, this has been going on for years, under various governments. Over 20 years ago I did a temporary job in a Jobcentre (slightly better than being unemployed!), and it went on then, along with employers advertising a job at a salary, then offering it to a candidate for less on a pretext, and even one memorable employer who advertised for secretaries but actually trying to recruit girls for adult entertainment! The last was arrested, but all we could with the others was refuse to accept their vacancies; they then complained to regional management, said they wouldn't do it again - then did.

 

The problem is lack of deterrent and enforcement, not some conspiracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is lack of deterrent and enforcement, not some conspiracy.

 

Correct - nothing is a conspiracy, really. Or, to put it another way, "never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."

 

UJM is awful because, well, some idiot had a big idea and the problem turned out to be harder to solve than anyone actually thought. So now they have to make it compulsory and harass people because, well, the alternative is to admit failure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not the Gov's fault. It's the recruitment agents that post fake jobs to fish for contacts and leads. The labour market is fecked. "Jobs" don't exist anymore.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could start with: If it's an agency ask for the name of the company even if they don't publish it on the site 2) random checks on the company 3) take the agency to court if they are found to advertising fake jobs. But to accomplish this they'd need their own task force.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, but who who would police the task force?.. probably the very same DWP people who are allowing the fake jobs up there in the first place.

 

'The more things change, the more they stay the same'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also no real incentive to clean up bogus job vacancies as it inflates the numbers.

 

Might be a good start to reign in the company Kleeneaze. Ch 4 news found that most of the bogus jobs were advertised by them (or their employees).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid there's no way for the DWP to police this. How on earth would they verify if a vacancy was genuine?

 

To be fair, that's for them to work out, not us. If they're going to use the threat of starvation to force people to use their website, it's incumbent on them to ensure that said site is not a steaming pile of excrement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed a LOT of "work from home" jobs on their when I was looking

ALL of them were the [problem] ads, where you pay for "Information" which you then sell on by posting ads yourself

It's nuts.

Why they allow them is anyone's guess.

I always avoid anything that mentions starting your own "business".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be clear about this - UJM os a steaming pile of turd, it serves NO PURPOSE at all apart from being a spying machinr for JCP, DWP and WP providers. There are no REAL jobs on there all that it offers is zero contract jobs, catalogue distribution, cleaning and workfare activities.

 

From about 2 weeks in to being unemployed I refused to use it and it is not on my JSA agreement to do so, my advisers at JCP were happy with this as I proved I use many other external sources to search for work (albeit I now think a lot of advertised jobs on there are bogus) but at least it seems more real.

 

I am highly educated and have many years of work experience and I refused to use UJM as it provide NO HELP whatsoever to someone looking for positions at the higher end of the market. I even had one adviser tell me it was rubbish and would not benefit me at all.

 

So, to be frank and honest to you all - you won't find real work using UJM, it is a tool devised to keep tabs on you - simple as that.

 

It should be scrapped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UJM makes the WP's agents life easy to apply for fake jobs on behalf of the jobseekers. I've seen it done. My former WP agent told me.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't take them an hour a day to remove and block all the fake ads

Any ad which diverts you to CV submission sites, should raise a red flag, not to mention the "Start you rown business" ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's not hard but it's too simple for those in charge.

The amount of bureaucracy involved in doing anything with Gov't is laughable.

if any council in the UK was a business they'd all go out of business.

Someone somewhere is accountable for the UJM and person is trying to protect their job and your expense.

its pretty obvious the UJM wasn't tested properly but it was signed off as fit for purpose by someone in a govt who's scared of failure and doesn't want to seen as wasting public money.....Well guess what!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Isn't it good to know we're in safe hands?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

https://jobsearch.direct.gov.uk/GetJob.aspx?JobID=8059837

 

Another fake one.

 

They keep allowing a certain company to post jobs who I know is striking off his compNy. I worked for this guy and was lied to and then not paid. I had to take him to court for wages were he continued to lie (badly). He continues to take people on, put them in a job, then doesn't pay up. I was assured by my "advisor", after providing all the proof that he would not be allowed to post adverts. Unsurprisingly he's still posting. I flagged this again through the site and was told "you'll have to speak to your advisor". I replied "I have been signed off for two years. Do not assume I am a claimant.." No reply but he's still posting....absolute joke

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said it before. If a jobseeker is out of pocket or has his or her personal data, security and identity compromised, then they should be apologised to and compensated in full by the DWP ASAP. The DWP should then pursue these conmen through the courts for the monies owed.

 

 

An alternative should ideally be a class action lawsuit against Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey, DWP and JCP. They are the ones making it mandatory for jobseekers to use the unfit for purpose UJM and apply for vacancies hat are highly dubious to say the least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smoeone needs to start collecting evidence then XD

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...