Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi slick!    On 22 July they said they would refund me £74.07 Theres no DD in place as my membership was a once off payment in November last year.  Hi Dx,    I paid through PayPal last year as a one off payment. 
    • I'm trying to understand it all but I certainly tend to agree with my colleague @dx100uk that it looks as if you may have been taken for a ride. You found an advertisement for a bag on an online sales site. Instead of going through the established procedure of that site, which presumably allows them to recover a commission from the seller you started dealing directly with the seller who is an unknown person to you and of course that allowed the seller to avoid paying the commission. At whose suggestion was it that you went off-site? You then pay by PayPal but instead of logging it with PayPal as a payment for a purchased item, you tell PayPal that it was actually simply a gift or transaction between friends and family. This also allowed the seller to avoid paying a PayPal fee on the money. At whose suggestion was it that you paid in this way?       I don't say that you definitely have been scammed, but it doesn't look very good. This is how it might have happened: after you agreed to take the transaction off-site, so you lost the protection of the established system – and the seller avoided the commission and also avoided the sales site knowing that they had sold their item, you then agreed to pay the seller some money – but not for a purchase – simply as a gift. This has two consequences. Firstly, the seller avoids a PayPal fee and secondly, because PayPal has been misled as to the purpose of the payment, you lose the protection of PayPal if it turns out that you've been scammed or there is some other problem with the transaction. The seller then apparently sent you the parcel and they sent you pictures of a package with your address on it. Separately they sent you a Hermes tracking number – but there is no evidence that the package was actually posted to your address. The seller might simply have taken a picture with your address and sent that to you by way of reassurance – and then changed the label and posted the parcel to themselves but sent you a tracking number which is inaccessible to you and in respect of which you will be prevented from getting any information. All you've seen is a parcel with your address on it. All you've been given is a tracking number which satisfied you for a while until the parcel did not arrive and then when you started to make enquiries, you found that you were unable to access any details referring to the tracking number. Of course the tracking number says that the item was delivered – because maybe it was – but in that case it was delivered to the address on the parcel which might have been the seller's own address – or the address of a friend. I don't want to say that this is definitely how it happened, but it is a plausible scenario. Of course Hermes is an awful lot of parcels – but on the other hand I expect that most of the parcel is that going to Hermes hands are delivered successfully. We only get the bad stories on this forum. I can imagine that Hermes rate of successful deliveries is better than 97% because otherwise people wouldn't simply just hate them, they would go out of business.   We can help you bring a complaint against Hermes if you want. However, on the basis of what you say, the odds are stacked against you but it would be useful to try and find out the address which was associated with tracking number. As far as your apparent willingness to travel hundred and 50 miles to ask for your money back, don't bother. If you did actually go there, are you sure that the seller actually lives at the address that you have been given? What evidence do you have that? Of course if you found that the seller didn't reside at that address then it is slamdunk that you have been scammed. But then what are you going to do? You can try to inform the police but of course it won't get you anywhere. You can inform the sales website – but they will say that you brought it on yourself because you agreed to go off-site. You can inform PayPal – that they will say that because you sent the money which was calculated to avoid their fees, you have lost the protection. If you travelled the 150 miles and found that the seller did reside at that address, do you really think that they are going to hand your money over to you? If they are acting dishonestly then they will simply say that it is nothing to do with them, that they addressed it all correctly and they don't understand what has happened and that this is simply Hermes up to their old tricks. What are you going to do? You simply risk getting into a very nasty argument and depending on how bad it went, you might even find that the police are called and I'm afraid that they would be looking at you – not the seller. Maybe you can answer the questions that I've post above as to who it is who initiated the various ways of doing business.    
    • The legal campaign's going well then. The recount in Wisconsin gave Trump more votes but Biden even more, at a cost of $3m. And a donor to the organisation bringing the failed cases is suing to get his $2.5m back.   https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/28/joe-biden-gains-votes-in-wisconsin-county-after-trump-ordered-recount
    • Yes Unicorn feed tax again, can't sue the keeper for more than the Original Charge, so any additional Debt Collection fees aka the £60 they add is abuse,iof process as per HHJ Harvey at Lewes county Court What lookedinfroinfo is indicating is that the main signage on entry and dotted around is merely an " Invitation to Treat", not the offer, the Offer and Acceptance occurs at the payment machine, so wording there is key.
  • Our picks

Dismissed for apparent "Gross misconduct", need some help PLEASE!!!!!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2483 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I am a gas engineer by trade, I have recently been dismissed from work for an apparent act of gross misconduct by leaving a supposed gas leak. The long and short of it is, that a National Grid engineer attended a property after I had carried out some gas work (8 hours later). I have been in touch with National Grid and the engineer's van was on site for a total of 6 minutes (18:01-18:07).

 

In these 6 minutes the engineer had supposedly got his tools out, traced and repaired the gas leak, carried out all safety checks, and left the relevant paperwork?? For those of you not in the know, a gas tightness test (to check for gas leaks) alone takes 4 minutes, that leaves 2 minutes for the engineer to complete all the rest of the work/checks.

 

I know for sure that I carried out all the relevant safety checks, and there was no leak present when I left the property. The work I carried out was in a small pantry just off the kitchen, with a closing door. My guess is that the customer had entered that pantry, there was still a lingering smell of gas from the earlier work carried out, so panicked and contacted National Grid.

 

There is no physical evidence that there was even a gas leak on site, and no paperwork left by the National Grid engineer confirming this, just an email saying that a leak was repaired. As far as I am concerned the National Grid engineer could have told the customer he had repaired a leak, just to put her mind at ease.

 

I was sacked for gross misconduct on the grounds of probability, saying that I "probably" didn't carry out the correct safety checks, when I know for sure that I did. There is not one bit of evidence, apart from that email saying that a leak had been repaired, it is just my word against theirs. I have my first child on the way in 2 weeks, and would not risk my job for the sake of carrying out a 30 second check with gas leak detector spray.

 

I also do not think that the dismissal was fair, in relation to previous cases of gas leaks with other employees. There are two engineers still working for the company who in the past year have left open ended gas pipes (major leaks) yet they have been given final warnings. I was under the impression that all disciplinaries should be dealt with in an equal manner? Yet I have been dismissed on the grounds of "probability", without any physical evidence.

 

I have an appeal hearing on Friday, and help/information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Edited by Andyorch
Paras added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am not familiar with the rules within the gas industry, but understand that safety is obviously paramount but I cant see disciplinary procedures being any different from other occupations in regards to the law.

Have a look at this link for any pointers that could be helpful.

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2177

 

Make sure you have all your info and points that you want to raise written down and dont feel intimidated.

Make sure you exercise your right to be accompanied by a colleague or better still your workplace rep or union official.

You didn'nt say wether you had any previous warnings for other issues that may have prompted them into a dissmisal rather than suspension pending your hearing?

Anyway good luck.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi craiga20uk

 

Could you please give us some further information to be able to assist you.

 

1. How long have you been employed with the company?

2. Before the Disciplinary hearing were your rights of being accompanied by either a Work Colleague or Union Rep explained to you?

3. What was your dismissal date?

4. After the Disciplinary has your right to Appeal been explained to you and the time limit?

5. Are you in a Union?

 

Please have a look at the ACAS link in the post#5

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi craiga20uk

 

Could you please give us some further information to be able to assist you.

 

1. How long have you been employed with the company?

2. Before the Disciplinary hearing were your rights of being accompanied by either a Work Colleague or Union Rep explained to you?

3. What was your dismissal date?

4. After the Disciplinary has your right to Appeal been explained to you and the time limit?

5. Are you in a Union?

 

Please have a look at the ACAS link in the post#5

 

I have been employed by the company since November 2012. I am pretty sure that they followed the correct procedures in going about the disciplinary, I just cannot see how they have come to the desicion that it was classed as gross misconduct.

I have had no other disciplinary problems whilst working for the company, no verbal warnings, nothing.

I just cannot get my head around how they have come to their desicion, any why they would take the word of a third party engineer, over mine. Especially when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, no readings, no details of where the actual supposed leak was, no paperwork left on site to back the findings up.

And as previously mentioned, there are two engineers still working for the company who left open ended gas pipes, which is far worse than what I am being accused of, yet they've still got their jobs??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand you are upset but can you please answer all the questions stu asked, they are important and he is trying to help you!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand you are upset but can you please answer all the questions stu asked, they are important and he is trying to help you!

 

I was dismissed on Thursday 21st January, and yes, I am member of the gmb union. Like I said previously, I think the company followed the actual correct procedure, and gave me opportunity to be accompanied by the union rep.

Man other thing that I am not happy about is that at the appeal hearing will be the manager to decided to dismiss me for gross misconduct, I thought an appeal should be heard by someone who is impartial?

I think all the other questions have been answered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Man other thing that I am not happy about is that at the appeal hearing will be the manager to decided to dismiss me for gross misconduct, I thought an appeal should be heard by someone who is impartial?

I think all the other questions have been answered.

 

 

 

When you say the manager will be present, do you mean chairing the appeal hearing or just being part of it? He should be attending to give the reasons why the decision to dismiss was taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, what does your union rep say?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience appeals are usually chaired by a different or more senior manager.

Dissmisal for gross misconduct without prior warnings or disciplines, is the ultimate punishment and should be reserved for the most serious of offences.

You say in your first post that you were dissmissed on the grounds of "probability"

Decisions of this severity should be based wholly on "Actuallity" rather than probability. If the appeal decision is upheld I would suggest your employers are leaving themselves open to you taking the matter further.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites
In my experience appeals are usually chaired by a different or more senior manager.

Dissmisal for gross misconduct without prior warnings or disciplines, is the ultimate punishment and should be reserved for the most serious of offences.

You say in your first post that you were dissmissed on the grounds of "probability"

Decisions of this severity should be based wholly on "Actuallity" rather than probability. If the appeal decision is upheld I would suggest your employers are leaving themselves open to you taking the matter further.

 

That's what I intend to do, I know in my heart of hearts that I done all the relevant safety checks to ensure that the property in question was left in a safe manner. I have had no other disciplinary issues or run ins with any management whilst working for the company.

My main issue is that I know there are engineers still working there, who without question left major gas leaks at customers properties, yet they only receive a final warning? There doesn't seem to be any consistency with their disciplinary outcomes.

Me and my partner are due to have our first child in 2 weeks time, and I wouldn't risk my job and baby's livelihood by not carrying out the correct safety checks.

I also work on a call out rota, which is worth an extra £500 a week to me, money that I shouldn't have missed out on.

I can't explain how frustrated I an with the whole thing, if I had done wrong then I would have gladly held my hands up and walked away, but I know I have done all that I should have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know its hard but try and forget, at least for now anyway, about other ppl.

Your priotity is getting your facts in chronological order, and put your appeal forward in a clear and concise manner.

Certainly towards the end of the appeal explain your reasons for doing so in your final submissions, cerrtainly dont mention or threaten to take the matter further.

But be positive enough to let the see that you wont be letting the matter rest.

 

Quite frankly your workplace or union rep should I hope be giving you all tne assurances and support you need, if you are unhappy with his handling contact your branch and ask to speak the branch secretary, he may give you extra support or contact a regional advisor on your behalf.

 

I agree with you, based on your explanation you should not be in this situation, particularly with an addition onits way.

Edited by boswell
typo

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I k ow its hard but try and forget, at least for now anyway, about other ppl. Your priotity is getting your facts in chronological order, and put your appeal forward in a clear and concise manner.

Certainly towards the end of the appeal explain your reasons for doing so in your final submissions, cerrtainly dont mention or threaten to take the matter further.

But be positive enough to let the see that you wont be letting the matter rest.

Quite frankly your workplace or union rep should I hope be giving you all tne assurances and support you need, if you are unhappy with his handling contact your branch and ask to speak the branch secretary, he may give you extra support or contact a regional advisor on your behalf.

I agree with you, based on your explanation you should not be in this situation, particularly with an addition onits way.

 

To be honest with you, I have had hardly any contact with the union rep, and not received any support from him. I was told that the regional rep could attend the appeal with me, but not until late next week, I cannot afford to wait that long. At the moment I don't know where my next wage is coming from, which is certainly not an ideal situation with a baby on the way.

I feel like I have been treated like a criminal, when I know I have done nothing wrong. Throughout the whole process it has felt like I was guilty until proven innocent, and received no support whatsoever from management at the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame your rep didnt at least attempt to get the decision suspended pending the outcome of your appeal, not always successful, but has worked in the past for situations like yours and others facing hardship.

 

Does your union not operate a hardship/support fund to help ppl during these situations.

 

Its ok for me to suggest it but I am not in the middle like you. I would try and postpone till next week when your regional guy is availale, they dont like losing a case, believe me.

 

 

 

If you explain to the company that a regional advisor is conducting your appeal, they will be stocking up an Andrex

 

If they refuse they will be further strenghening your hand for grounds for Unfair Dismissal.

 

Of course the decision is yours based on your situation and finances.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait for your area organiser. They will know which questions to ask and will put your case in the best way.

I know how hard it is, been there.

While you are waiting look for jobs and apply you need to be planning for the worst outcome while hoping for the best.

Trust the union. Paid officials know their stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot afford *not* to have your rep there. Wait!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
You cannot afford *not* to have your rep there. Wait!

 

My concern is, that waiting another week for an area rep, is another week without me earning money. I've got a family to think about now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your family would no doubt like you in a skilled job for the long run. You'll go with your own choice obviously, but going solo didn't seem to work well in the original hearing.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Craig. I fear you may not be receiving the full facts re your predicament. You were employed in Nov '12 ... correct ? Thus, unless you have been subject to discriminatory treatment (no evidence thereof to date) then you have no right to claim unfair dismissal until you've been employed for 2 years - ie Nov 2014. Your appeal will most likely not be upheld. Employers rarely back down. The other engineers who you allege caused a major leak may have worked in the firm for a sufficient term in order to be afforded rights to claim unfair dismissal. Thus, your employer may have backed off sacking them.

 

Justice may not be on your side. Many dismissals are based on one persons word against another etc. If you were dismissed w/o notice then you may be able to claim wrongful dismissal and reclaim your contract notice or statutory notice ( a meagre one week !). A solicitor would be of little help as they may not be able to profit from helping you. Do you have legal expenses insurance cover with your home/ contents policy .. that may help you. Union reps can be useless, but they be your best hope. Sorry to be negative, but best you may be able to hope for is a compromise agreement whereby you at least can get a decent reference to get another job.

 

Above is only an opinion. I may be wrong !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules state,

At east one year's continuous service for employees in employment before 6th April 2012

Two years for employees starting employment on or after 6th April 2012

 

There is no length of service requirement in relation to automatically unfair grounds.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly, might get it on the grounds of representation.

I would never have let that happen in the first place had I been there. And with all respects to rhe OP, we are really only hearing his side, but either way I am convinced there were other options that could have replaced dismissal.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again I agree, but employers know their rights and AUF is a long, long shot. Without UF protection the OP may be more a victim of the system. Anyhow, the OP appears to have lost interest as not seen any feedback re current situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you BB on all counts.

 

As I said in previous post ID on the first count is severe in the extreme for a first offence without prev history.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...