Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid £99 to a driving school for '5 pupils on try us and see offer' - Ripped off


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my friend who is a driving instructor paid £99 to a national driving school who had a 'try us and see' offer..

.where you pay them £99 and they promise to give you '5 pupils' to show how good they (the company are)..

.you then decide if you want to take a franchise out with the company.

 

my friend paid £99 to this driving school

she was given the details of a pupil in another town.

 

..she called the pupil and explained she was unable to take this pupil for her test and

she should contact the driving school to arrange her test

or ask the driving school to send one of their own instructors,

 

she also explained this to the driving school who told her

'this will not be classed as one of your 5 pupils'

and the driving school would find her other pupils

(a total of 5 for the £99 she paid them)

 

To cut a long story short my friend has not been provided with any pupils since this incident,

the driving school are ignoring her calls.

 

My friend wants the £99 she paid back.

..she feels ripped off because the school promised

' 5 pupils for £99 try us and see'

- she was not provided with one pupil.

 

Shall my friend send them a letter by recorded delivery,

in it state that they have not supplied the pupils as agreed.

 

As a result she holds them to be on breach of contract and demand a refund of the full fee of £95 within 14 days.

 

Can anyone please help

my friend feels ripped off

 

she has spoken to another driving instructor who has said contact trading standards

but my friend has never been in such a situation before

...any of the experiened caggers able to help my friend get her money back?

 

My friend has the leaflet with the offer she took

Link to post
Share on other sites

section 75 if she paid by credit card

 

or chargeback by debit card

 

sz

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name and shame them.

 

Trading Standards is a good start, as is send this outfit a Letter before Action (LBA) giving them 7 days in which to refund the money or face further action.

If they ignore the LBA, then IMO I would issue a claim via the small claims track.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

She paid with her debit card £99 to this particular driving school.

 

The driving school has now 'removed' the offer from their website....but my friend has a paper copy of the offer she was given when she met a person from the driving school who gave her paperwork with the offer.

 

dx100uk how does my friend go about getting the chargeback done and what does she have to explain to the bank?

 

This is the small print from their website "The trial is performance related. After a low initial payment of just £99, you don't pay another penny until we hit the pupil supply targets (5 pupils) .'No other school offers you a no commitment "try before you buy" period like this so call today to start your trial within days. Due to the nature of this trial the payment is non refundable'

 

My friend has been waiting for over 4 months and not received the 5 pupils the offer stated she has been had!

 

The company state the 'The trial is performance related and has no time restriction' - well its been over 4 months for my friend and nothing!

 

Its been over 120 days she my friend made payment she was fobbed off by the company who told her "we are working to get you pupils" but which was a sly method of going past the 120 period for charge back

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can explain chargeback, if she/he has paid by debit card then go into her local bank and simply say to the bank employee "I wish to do a chargeback please." You will probably explain the situation in short but you do not really have to, the bank official will then produce an instruction statement which you sign as this is that any liability you are responsible for.

 

The money i believe is in your account straight away or at the very most the end of that business day, the icing on the cake for me is ...... For the pleasure of instructing your bank to perform the chargeback, your bank will charge them £20 and not you! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend paid £99 is that under the charge back limit (plus its been over 4 months, so what shall she tell them like when she 'realised' what was happening) - she was being ripped off.

 

She is going to the bank if the bank asks her does she say "i paid £99 for a service which was not provided"?

 

 

I can explain chargeback, if she/he has paid by debit card then go into her local bank and simply say to the bank employee "I wish to do a chargeback please." You will probably explain the situation in short but you do not really have to, the bank official will then produce an instruction statement which you sign as this is that any liability you are responsible for.

 

The money i believe is in your account straight away or at the very most the end of that business day, the icing on the cake for me is ...... For the pleasure of instructing your bank to perform the chargeback, your bank will charge them £20 and not you! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In effect yes! Its not like Visa where you need to spend £100 , i have done it with papal, BT and quite a few others for amounts ranging from £20 - 500 but it can be any amount.

 

You, are instructing your bank, you are not asking permission so the bank teller has to do as instructed unless its fraud. Generally you will find them on your side, just say you paid for service and you did not receive, you have spent the last two months trying to get them to respond without success and you have now had enough, hence you are instructing chargeback as they are not responding to your request for refund.

 

You are not asking for permission you are 'Instructing' your bank to do a chargeback .

 

PS: If you do telephone banking? You can instruct a chargeback that way too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just spoken to my friend she told me she thinks she paid the £99 in June or July but is not certain - will this be an issue?

 

Or can she say the driving school told her to allow upto 12 weeks for '5 pupils' and she has since spent the last 4 months with no luck trying to get her money back?

 

Is there a time period of 120 days from the date my friend made the payment to the driving school to the time she is doing the chargeback if thats the case i think its 6 or 7 months since she made the payment but she was told the pupils '...would take time to produce and it would not happen overnight with no time period in place'.

 

I think she has waited enough don't you think

 

 

In effect yes! Its not like Visa where you need to spend £100 , i have done it with papal, BT and quite a few others for amounts ranging from £20 - 500 but it can be any amount.

 

You, are instructing your bank, you are not asking permission so the bank teller has to do as instructed unless its fraud. Generally you will find them on your side, just say you paid for service and you did not receive, you have spent the last two months trying to get them to respond without success and you have now had enough, hence you are instructing chargeback as they are not responding to your request for refund.

 

You are not asking for permission you are 'Instructing' your bank to do a chargeback .

 

PS: If you do telephone banking? You can instruct a chargeback that way too.

Edited by Purpleflowers 2
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell her not to worry! It takes 5 mins to do and if she simply states the truth as you have outlined she has NO worries . She will not be interegated just asked for simple explanation. The timescale is not an issue unless of course they have shut their bank account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And make a formal complaint about them to TS as well, it might be a very well worn trick they employ!

Name and shame please?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has spoken to the CAB they have told her write a letter to the driving school asking them to honour the contract by xyz date or issue a refund if they are not able to honour the contract...she does not know how to structure the letter can you help her?

 

Trading Standards have been passed the information as well by CAB - if the driving school does not issue the refund it will be escalated

 

 

And make a formal complaint about them to TS as well, it might be a very well worn trick they employ!

Name and shame please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...