Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking Clydesdale to court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have sent away the first letter to my bank claiming unfair bank charges, received letter back saying not entitled etc along with a leaflet Addressing your complaint (Im with clydesdale bank). I therefore am unsure what to do next, do I send the second letter to my branch (like I did with the first one or send to head office) Also is there a template available for second letter? Any help very much appreciated!!:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You may have more luck posting in the Yorkshire & Clydesdale section.

 

It looks as if you have sent your prelim off . Give them 14 days from date they received it and then send your LBA off (template in the library) You then have to allow another 14 days before filing your court claim. Send them both to head office.

 

Hope this helps

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aneles, before you get clobbered by the Mods - have you read the FAQ's? there is a step by step guide to getting everything you need to get your money back. Once you've spent a few days going through all those and then another few days reading some of the threads and have started posting the responses then you'll be inundated by enthusiastic and very helpful people helping you through every step of the way.

 

Welcome to the site, you might not see us but we're watching! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After sending my second letter re claiming for unfair bank charges I received a very long detailed letter and a cheque for £433-half of the amount I was claiming for. My querry is do I just accept this or do I fight for the whole amount. I was expecting a letter offering me this amount first and not the actual cheque. The letter sounds like I should accept as states that i could take them to court but likewise They could do the same to me for breach of contract in failing to adhere to to the terms and conditions of the account. Any advice gratefully received.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

After sending my second letter re claiming for unfair bank charges I received a very long detailed letter and a cheque for £433-half of the amount I was claiming for. My querry is do I just accept this or do I fight for the whole amount. I was expecting a letter offering me this amount first and not the actual cheque. The letter sounds like I should accept as states that i could take them to court but likewise They could do the same to me for breach of contract in failing to adhere to to the terms and conditions of the account. Any advice gratefully received.:confused:

 

 

Yes Lessers right, you need to write and say that " Thank you very much for their offer which you are happy to accept as a part payment towards your claim but you will continue with your claim through the court for the balance in full, unless they would like to settle before then "

 

That's the spirit!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, i think thats what i'll do. As i said their letters make it sound as if im totally unreasonable for asking to be refunded for charges which were applied through my fault, but then why pay anything then?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, do I cash cheque asap or wait till the whole thing resolved? Are they correct in saying they could take me to court for breach of terms and contract? as I dont wont to go down that road!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, do I cash cheque asap or wait till the whole thing resolved? Are they correct in saying they could take me to court for breach of terms and contract? as I dont wont to go down that road!!

 

 

As long as the cheque's not been issued with a full and final statement attached.

What was this ' detailed letter' all about?

 

I'd hold onto the cheque for a day or two until we are quite clear what the conditions were. I hardly think they are in a position to take you to court for breach of contract when they are breaching the law? Someone else might like a take on this one but I think it's just scaremongering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Im another Newbie so please be gentle with me!! My situation is this: After two letters to the Clydesdale SCOTLAND I received a cheque for half of the amount owed, after advice from this forum I was told to accept cheque but say that I would still persue claim for full amount. The letter stating this was sent saying that if i failed to receive/hear within 14 days I would proceed with claim, 14 days is now up so going to proceed, went to do this online but says that organisation has to be in England/Wales, so whatwith Clydesdale being in Scotland couldnt proceed. Help!!:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use MCOL if you're in England or Wales, even though Clydesdale are in Scotland. The important thing is that you have an English or Welsh address for service.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would prefer to do it online but because of the Clydesdale address being Scotland cant, is there another address for Clydesdale that I can use to enable me to use this service, thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your branch is in England, I believe you can use its address.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...