Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • doesn't say will anything. read it properly and carefully.   only the owner of a debt can get one of the many fake/tame paperwork only solicitors to issue any proceedings and they would have to abide by the courts pre action protocol of 30  days letter first!   as it's owner...i can try and instruct my dog to sit, if it does is a totally different matter. if my neighbour, who doesn't own my dog, tries it, it would ignore them.   the bottom line is there is nothing anyone can do to you. gyms don't do court gym debts don't appear on credit files.   any DCA they might get to write to you ARE NOT BAILIFFS any a DCA has ZERO legal powers on any debt, no matter what it's type.   dx    
    • This letter arrived in the post today, please advise how to proceed. I know the forums say they won't action but am very worried about this
    • go save his bacon clint and put him right...   dx  
    • one multipage pdf only please read our upload guide carefully please   dx
    • Good to hear from you, London, I was wondering how you were getting on.   Take care.  
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

What would a landlord need to do to evict someone who is on a periodic tenancy once their AST has finished?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2457 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Am I right in understanding that they would need to serve a notice to quit, and once expired they can seek an eviction order?

 

Or is there something I'm missing?

 

Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

A Section 21 notice is what you serve. Two months clear notice which expires on the last day of the period of the tenancy and you seek possession after that day.

In the covering letter let the tenants know that if they are still there when the notice expires, you will commence possession proceedings to get a possession order to evict them and they will be liable for court fees.

 

Section 8 can be used as well. Here the notice is 14 days because it is for serious rent arrears, as well as for possession [has to be at least 8 weeks arrears when the notice is served]. However, tenants can slow this one down considerably with a counter claim for disrepair or non protection of tenancy deposit. We talking 6 months delay.

 

Section 21 notice is defective if at the time of service the tenancy deposit is not protected. To get possession with a Section 8, tenant has to be at least 8 weeks late at the time of the service of the notice and also at the time of the court hearing, otherwise the judge has discretion and may allow tenant to stay provided keeps up paying the rent as well as paying back arrears in agreed instalments.

 

Keep proof of posting and copy of the notice. If they do not sign for recorded delivery, it will be returned to you so first just post it first class, and keep a certificate of posting. You can serve one copy witnessed by whoever you choose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LLs cannot serve Notice to Quit, only s21 to seek repossession after expiry of Notice only after repo Order has been granted can you use bailiffs to evict if Ts remain in residence beyond the Court order date.

 

 

With 8 years membership and a member of the site team, I assume you know how to search the Forum for relevant posts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 8 can be used as well. Here the notice is 14 days because it is for serious rent arrears, as well as for possession [has to be at least 8 weeks arrears when the notice is served]. However, tenants can slow this one down considerably with a counter claim for disrepair or non protection of tenancy deposit. We talking 6 months delay.

 

A s8 notice can be served for a variety of reasons, not just rent arrears. There are actually 17 grounds, eight of which are mandatory, which means the judge will have absolutely no discretion but to award possession if the ground is made out. The other 9 are discretionary. The periods of time for the notice depend on the ground used and can vary from issuing notice and filing in court on the same day, to two months.

 

A ground 8 claim cannot be 'slowed down' with a counter claim for disrepair or non-TDS compliance. TDS has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on a s8 claim - that has to be made separately. A g8 claim made out on the day notice is served and on the day of the hearing is MANDATORY.

 

Sequenci, you may be better off stating what you'd like to do and give details of the tenancy type, when it was started, whether deposit was protected, whether there are any breaches of the agreement by the tenant etc., as there may be specific grounds you can use rather than just a s21.

 

If there is nothing untoward, then the easiest way is a s21 - make sure you get the dates correct - or, if the LL wants to move back into the property because it was his home, then a s8 ground 1 will work equally as well. Unless the tenant has exeptional hardship factors, a s21 using accelerated proceedings should have them out within about a month of the notice ending, so long as you file for possession the day after the notice expires (case is decided on the papers without a court hearing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a Section 8 the LL seeks possession and possibly rent arrears. Claim form asks tenant if tenant has a counter claim. T states "LL failed to protect deposit and T intends to file a claim for statutory penalty for non-protection of deposit, which is 1-3 times the deposit paid".

 

LL states in claim form T owes 2 months rent. 2 months rent arrears will be reduced to one month or less if T wins counter claim: no possession will be awarded to LL if he sought possession only on grounds of rent arrears. Can list "persistently late with rent" as an additional ground.

 

T has to be at least 8 weeks late with the rent at the hearing, otherwise possession order not mandatory. Court has to let T make counter claim. Case management conference is listed. Next hearing date after the CM conference was in 6 months time for me so done it all 3 years ago.

 

Section 21 is the right thing the serve to get tenant out ASAP. A money claim for rent arrears can be made later. No guarantee that T will ever pay even if money is awarded to LL.

 

LL wants T out because T owes LL money. Court has to ask T if T has a money claim against LL. Some tenants might lie and state Disrepair, just to slow down the claim. T has the print out of an email asking LL to fix boiler as no heating for 2 months. T states boiler was never fixed hence T wants one months rent as compensation / damages. Court has a duty to look into it. LL may file a receipt to prove it was fixed and when.

 

Law aims to prevent homelessness. So does tenant. "Do you have a counter claim?" 'Yes.'

Link to post
Share on other sites
With a Section 8 the LL seeks possession and possibly rent arrears. Claim form asks tenant if tenant has a counter claim. T states "LL failed to protect deposit and T intends to file a claim for statutory penalty for non-protection of deposit, which is 1-3 times the deposit paid".

 

It's a separate claim. Writing it out above doesn't make it not a separate claim...two completely different tracks.

 

The rest of what you wrote is irrelevant. My post is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange, I though LL&T law had developed to protect Ts from unscrupulous LLs like Rachman (1950s) and improve safety.

If the purpose is to prevent homelessness why is s21 mandatory repo allowed together with several s8 grounds?

Many Judges may be reluctant to make a T homeless immediately, hence they have discretion to suspend repo for up to 42 days, neither can they ultimately deprive LL of his property.

s8 g8 repo also allows Councils to refuse social housing on basis T made themselves 'intentionally homeless' ergo T's fault.

If the purpose of legislation is to prevent homelessness then the all Govts have failed the several thousands living rough on the streets of UK, with Council & other houses being left empty in many towns & cities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

With 8 years membership and a member of the site team, I assume you know how to search the Forum for relevant posts?

 

Of course, but sometimes it's just easier, and more relevant, to start a thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a tenant started the tenancy before deposit protection was required and has been on a rolling tenancy since do they need to have the deposit protected.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

"This decision is wholly unsatisfactory for Landlords who took deposits in respect of

assured shorthold tenancies entered into pre-April 2007, which subsequently became

statutory periodic tenancies after 6 April 2007. On a strict interpretation of Section 215(1)

of the Housing Act, it appears insufficient for a Landlord to show an intention to comply

with Section 213 of the Housing Act 2004, by placing a deposit into an authorised

scheme late. As mooted by Lord Justice Lloyd, it is somewhat doubtful that anything

other than returning a deposit, which has not been protected, would be sufficient to

enable a Landlord to serve a valid Section 21 Notice. In cases where tenants are in

substantial rent arrears, or have caused damage to a property, a Landlord will be

reluctant to deliver back its only security."

Link to post
Share on other sites
[ATTACH=CONFIG]49049[/ATTACH]

 

I'll elucidate; Summary of the Superstrike vs. Rodrigues case The recent Court of Appeal case of Superstrike vs. Rodrigues concerns an assured horthold tenancy which was created in January 2007 prior to the introduction of mandatory tenancy deposit protection on 6 April 2007. The tenancy continued on a statutory periodic basis from January 2008 and the deposit remained unprotected. In 2011 a Section 21 notice was served to end the tenancy.

 

The Court of Appeal has ruled that when the tenancy continued on a statutory periodic basis in 2008 a new tenancy was made and a new deposit was deemed to have been received, and therefore fell under the requirements of tenancy deposit protection legislation. Having not met those requirements (to protect the deposit and serve Prescribed Information, including serving the scheme leaflet) the landlord was not entitled to serve a s21 notice.

 

We all wondered and knew this was the case but this ruling cleared it up until challenged.

 

The TDS has issued guidance on the matter https://www.tds.gb.com/resources/files/Superstrike%20v%20Rodrigues%20Scheme%20Guidance.pdf

 

Guidance is wrong though as not only does this fall foul of non protection it also fails on the non providing of the prescribed information within 30 days (?) set in the localism act.

 

Deposit must be returned in full or no valid notice can be issued. No matter what a landlord does they are open to deposit plus 3x deposit case for up to 6 years - N.B. these are being allowed by some Courts on the small claims track now.

 

Oh @ Beatrice Bee - a professional landlord would have known what everybody else did and protected the deposit on change from AST to PST same as they would of had to do when a new AST was granted after the TDS was incepted.

 

Edit:

 

Landlords can now use a Section 21 b notice at anytime just giving 2 months notice from date of service even on a PST. They do not have to use a Section 21.4a aligned to the end of a rental period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Superstrike has naff all to do with the s8 notice which caused the discussion in this thread!

 

A claim for non-TDS compliance is separate to a possession claim brought under s8. The case law has no bearing whatsover.

Link to post
Share on other sites
If a tenant started the tenancy before deposit protection was required and has been on a rolling tenancy since do they need to have the deposit protected.

 

Yes, the law changed on 6th May 2012. All LLs with current tenants at that time had to protect the deposit within 30 days - no concessions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting. I moved into my flat in Feb 2003 on an AST of 6 months. Ihave never signed a new tenancy . When I lost my job I got into a little arrears because HB is paid in arrears and not in advance. My LL served a S21 notice. We agreed a rent increase so the rent was inline with the LHA and I offered to sign a new tenancy which was refused as they would have to protect the deposit. Obviously from what you are saying the S21 was invalid . Could be interesting if and when I move out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Annie, why do you think your s21 was invalid?

Your T commenced 2003 - pre DPS, no deposit app taken.

You agreed a rent increase, LL did not require a new AST or deposit

 

 

AFAIK DPS rules only applied to ASTs requiring a deposit, in place as of Apr 2007, same for Localism Act 2012 (deadline 4 May 2012)

 

 

Perhaps you would like to start your own thread and explain further, for more advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to give you the final outcome for my initial query (as I hate it when people don't do this on their threads). My friend has agreed with the landlord to vacate at the end of Feb, they've found somewhere new to live. The landlord wishes to sell and is being quite nice about proceedings - though I will imagine my friend will get stung for the state of the place.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...