Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 1st 2 calls were the normal scam calls. get a truecall box   the PDC stuff you ignore their letter States our client three whom if you wanted too you deal with directly.   Until/unless whenever it gets sold on too and they eventually send a letter of claim you maintain radio silence    
    • hi all. bit of advice please. I had a Three contract up until November last year. At £11pcm for 24mths. Paid every month on time via their online portal. When I ported over, I received a letter from Three thanking me for being a customer blah blah blah.. It also said IF I owed anything a final bill will be sent. No final bill ever received - I get a phone call around the first week in December form an Indian sounding man who was extremly difficult to understand. Said he was calling from Three, and wanted me to confirm my details - something of which I didnt as something didnt sit right. He said I could log into my account and review my bill as I owed money and then hung up. After the call I thought I'd best log into my account just in case.  Couldnt log in. Account access denied. Logged on to chat - they said as I ported over and I was no longer a customer my access was suspended. Couple of weeks later I had another call from a local area number and answered again it was some Indian guy telling me I owed money, wanting me to confirm details. I refused and he said details will be sent out to me to my email on account and my home address as it was important. Once again nothing.. 15th Dec I received an email from PastDue in my name RE Three. Email stated they were contacting me about Three an I should receive a letter soon regards to this matter. Says about visiting their website.  22nd Jan another email form Pastdue. Stating they have yet to receive a response to the letter, and they had already sent me an email about this. We will continue to contact you until this matter is resolved. Again asks me to login. 23rd Jan letter received dated 13th Jan. Titled "We are here to help keep your Three Services"  Claiming I owed "Airetime Balance £201.43" and contract period was 26/11/2019 to 25/11/2020 States "We have been appointed by Three to recover the amount of £201.43. If you pay this amount in full Three may be able to waive the cancellation fee and reconnect their service for you" - what cancellation fee / re connection??? I ended the contract giving the 30days notice and paying the last bill.. Then the normal crap about its important to pay. If I'm experiencing difficulties etc. Now both December and  January Credit reports from ClearScore, Credit Karma, Credit Expert, Totally Money and Equifax all show Three as Closed and balance as Zero. (Date Satisfied /closed 17th Nov, bal 0, last updated 30th Nov) I've had nothing from Three. As far as I'm concerned I owe nothing as no final bill and no access to the portal. Should I email PastDue and do a prove it & attach proof of Credit Reports being £0 or do I do something else?  
    • Hi she did say she was cancelling and returned the equipment. It looks like they put her on a rolling contract for 24 months when she phoned before trying to reduce her payments as they kept going up.   I know Sky haven't done that to me. She didn't see that email as she's had lots of stressful situations. No letter in post or when she originally phoned about reducing her bill well over £100 they didn't tell her about this contract.   Like you say there should be recordings. BT mobile contract is separate to broadband and the cancellation fee is for the broadband. They have blocked her mobile so she can't use it and that is a contract.   She is phoning CAB in the morning and checking through her paperwork. I'm quite happy with Sky as they tell you upfront what is happening and have never rolled over my contract.   Thanks for taking time to reply it is much appreciated. 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2546 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just do not mention court at this stage. Your aim is to resolve this amicably; after all, you may need a reference from this employer in future. Secondly, by adopting a reasonable, polite, but firm attitude, you can demonstrate that we're reasonable from the outset should this lead to a dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats great. Thank you ever so much for that. I really do appreciate it! Wish I could compose letters like that!

 

Hello there.

 

It's good that you're pleased, Woad seems to have done a good job.

 

If you haven't already, you might consider saying thank you to Woad by clicking on the star at the bottom of their post and leaving a short message to enhance their reputation. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello there.

 

It's good that you're pleased, Woad seems to have done a good job.

 

If you haven't already, you might consider saying thank you to Woad by clicking on the star at the bottom of their post and leaving a short message to enhance their reputation. :)

 

HB

 

I will do :-)

 

They have replied. They are saying they wont pay it stating they are well within there rights not to pay me and to only pay me up until the day I stated my new employment!

 

I pointed out the fact that they didnt give me a choice whether I wanted to work it or not so why should I be penalised by there own decision. I would have worked the 4 weeks notice if I knew they would do this!

 

So with the letter they sent me cleary stating I didnt have to work it does that mean I have a good chance winning a small claims case or is it going to be a 50/50?

 

Im just upset that the owner himself said to me in the meeting "You are free to find another job within your notice and even if you get one straight away I will still pay you" I obviosuly dont have this is writting but being an honest person and obviously a bit naive I didnt think to ask for it in writing.

 

I hope you can get the gist of what help or advice I am asking for and can help me.

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to raise a Notice of Grievance, referring to their letter that as you were made redundant you have the right to seek employment during your notice period, and they confirmed in writing that you were not expected to work during your notice period and therefore were free to seek and start a new role, and this was verbally confirmed by the managing director (or whatever his position is). A key point here may depend on the exact wording of their response; if they have not denied your point that the MD verbally confirmed you could start work elsewhere, then it is taken as read that they acknowledge he did indeed do so. (This is why when responding to any allegation of misconduct, for example, it is essential to challenge every point; unchallenged points are taken that the employee accepts them). If they later try to deny it, you have at least two pieces of correspondence where it went unchallenged.

 

Why do you need to do this? You may be able to raise a case of Wrongful Dismissal via an employment tribunal, but to do this you must be able to demonstrate that you followed the company's complaints system and gave them every opportunity to resolve the issue. I am not a lawyer, but I would imagine the same holds for the small claims court.

 

Their response was very quick - too quick to have been dealt with by mail... did you post a letter or use email? I suggest using a written letter, as it completely avoids any suggestion of an "unauthorised member of staff", "my PA", "you forged it" etc. Also, its easy to get proof of posting. And most magistrates are more familiar with letters rather than email! Heck, I know of one who was unconvinced that fax's were a valid form of communication, 15 years after they were accepted as such!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I sent the letter that was kindly templated for me with the obvious adjustments via email but also posted a typed version today via recorded mail.

 

His response "As per my previous email, we placed you on 4 weeks gardeners leave which was an act of goodwill on our side when you consider the alternative. Since you started your employ within this period we are entitled to reduce your gardeners leave accordingly. "

 

Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he state the alternative? There is no alternative other than to pay you 4 weeks salary in advance and dismiss you with immediate effect, or to ask that you continue to work AND grant paid time off to seek alternative employment. He HAD to give you 4 weeks notice.

 

Now, as stated, I am not a lawyer, but imho this is certainly worth considering taking further. At least a freebie 30min initial consultation with a specialist employment solicitor, or CAB. I'd be spitting blood. BUT, I have to add, you may feel it is not worth the hassle for the £300 you are owed.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Did he state the alternative? There is no alternative other than to pay you 4 weeks salary in advance and dismiss you with immediate effect, or to ask that you continue to work AND grant paid time off to seek alternative employment. He HAD to give you 4 weeks notice.

 

Now, as stated, I am not a lawyer, but imho this is certainly worth considering taking further. At least a freebie 30min initial consultation with a specialist employment solicitor, or CAB. I'd be spitting blood. BUT, I have to add, you may feel it is not worth the hassle for the £300 you are owed.

 

No did not state an alternative!

 

If it will only cost me £25 to make a small claim then I will more out of principle! I was going to reply saying, "by law I had to be given 4 weeks notice so I have no idea why you say this 4 weeks leave was given as a goodwill gesture when it was you who told me not to attend work!" I however didnt as this is tit for tat but it annoys me that he can reply with nosense but I cant!

 

So now, Do you go to the small claims court and make a claim? Do you know the process? and what claim I need to make?

Link to post
Share on other sites

write another letter headed "letter before action", setting out what you believe the position to be.

 

Give him a week to reply, then lodge your claim at money claim online.

  • Confused 1

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
write another letter headed "letter before action", setting out what you believe the position to be.

 

Give him a week to reply, then lodge your claim at money claim online.

 

I will do.

 

Sorry I know it seems im asking for everyone to do the work for me but I honestly have no idea how to format or what to write with theses things.

 

Would I say. something like.

 

Letter Before action.

 

I hearby give you 7 days notice from the date of this letter to pay all monies owed to me.

 

I believe I am entitled to £xx for my 4 weeks notice from which I was told not to work.

 

You have told me that, this 4 weeks leave was given out of goodwill and nothing more when actually the law states I must be given 4 weeks. You also mentioned something about what the alternative would have been but failed to mention this to me.

 

I believe there has been a lot of failings ragarding this matter and all I wish is to be amicable and have the monies I am owed paid to me.

 

Any more help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry one thing I forgot to add, He has requested that all correspondence now be sent to his outsourced hr manager/depo. Should I do this or should I carry of sending them directly to the director?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can oneone advice on the way I should format the letter before action letter? Received another email stating he has no intentions of paying it as he firmly beleives the the 4 weeks garden leave was given at his discretion and "not a legal entitlement"

 

So I suspect im not going to receive a reply to my letter so am wanting to get the before action letter done and ready to fire off asap so I can start the 7 day counter.

 

Once again I really do appreciate all the help I have received.

Link to post
Share on other sites
how long did you work there again?

 

https://www.gov.uk/redundant-your-rights/notice-periods

 

3 and half.

 

It says on the letter they send me "You have worked for the company for 3 years and are entitled one months notice" So if this is not the case can I still use the letter as fire power? To me that letter is a contract or written aggreement of what the company was given me! Or is this not the case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was just checking if you had a secondary point to back you up due to length of service.

 

I think a judge needs to decide, but your odds look reasonable to me.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool thank you :-)

 

He has accused me of being threatening as the day I got paid, In a bit of a rage, I emailed asking him why I had been uderpaid and when he replied saying he was only paying me up to the 13th as thats when I started my new job. I tired to call him several time throughout the day and kept getting fobbed off and being told he wouldnt take my call. So to me it was obvious he was avoiding me and this clearly showed what his intentions was so I fired off an email saying if he didnt reconsider I would seek legal advice.

 

Have I harmed my case doing this? I do see how its threatening but I do understand I should have asked again in the correct manner via written letter for proof before saying legal advice but I have no idea about all this and could not see the difference. He is allowed to refuse to pay me and mess me about but when I mention that I would take legal advice thats threatening!

 

Can someone please point me in the direction of where I can find a "letter before action" template?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct

 

ANNEX A

 

Guidance on pre-action procedure where no pre-action protocol or other formal pre-action procedure applies

 

1. General

 

1.1 This Annex sets out detailed guidance on a pre-action procedure that is likely to satisfy the court in most circumstances where no pre-action protocol or other formal pre-action procedure applies. It is intended as a guide for parties, particularly those without legal representation, in straightforward claims that are likely to be disputed. It is not intended to apply to debt claims where it is not disputed that the money is owed and where the claimant follows a statutory or other formal pre-action procedure.

Back to top

2. Claimant’s letter before claim

 

2.1 The claimant’s letter should give concise details about the matter. This should enable the defendant to understand and investigate the issues without needing to request further information. The letter should include –

(1) the claimant’s full name and address;

(2) the basis on which the claim is made (i.e. why the claimant says the defendant is liable);

(3) a clear summary of the facts on which the claim is based;

(4) what the claimant wants from the defendant; and

 

(5) if financial loss is claimed, an explanation of how the amount has been calculated.

2.2 The letter should also –

(1) list the essential documents on which the claimant intends to rely;

(2) set out the form of ADR (if any) that the claimant considers the most suitable and invite the defendant to agree to this;

(3) state the date by which the claimant considers it reasonable for a full response to be provided by the defendant; and

(4) identify and ask for copies of any relevant documents not in the claimant's possession and which the claimant wishes to see.

2.3 Unless the defendant is known to be legally represented the letter should –

(1) refer the defendant to this Practice Direction and in particular draw attention to paragraph 4 concerning the court's powers to impose sanctions for failure to comply with the Practice Direction; and

(2) inform the defendant that ignoring the letter before claim may lead to the claimant starting proceedings and may increase the defendant's liability for costs.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...